Dismissed

M/S. United India Insurance Company Ltd., v. Smt. N.Veeramma and 7 Others

Telangana HC9 Aug 2024MACMA/3753/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The appellant insurance company sought and obtained permission to withdraw an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, stating it had no bearing on potential future appeals by the claimants.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the appeal granted; the appeal dismissed as withdrawn.

M/S. United India Insurance Company Ltd… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

IN TH E HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY THE NINTH^{DAY OF AUGUST} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTYFOUR}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER}

¶5

IVOT OR ACCID^{ENT CIVILIVISCEL} NEOUS PP EAL NO: 3753 0F²⁰¹⁴

¶6

Appeal filed under^{Section 173 of I\4.V.Act,againstthe Judgment and} Decreedatedl4lo5l2olomadeino'P.No.lo4lof2006onthefileoftheCourtof the Chairman, MACT/Principal^{DistrictJudgeR R District atL B Nagar'} Hyderabad.

¶7

Between

¶8

l,4/S. United lndia^{lnsurance CompanyLtd., Rep.by- Branch Maqag.er'} i;;h"i";;: Ranoa Reddv^{District'PoiicvNo. 050101/31/05/05643 Policv} valid frSm 20112t2605 lo^1911212006

¶9

...Appellant/R2

¶10

AND

¶11

Smt. N.Veeramma,^{W/o. Late N.Pandu HouseholdR/oGhanpur ThandaRaj} Bollaram Village^{Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District}

¶12

N.Yadamma,^{D/o. Late N.Pandu Household R/o. GhanpurThandaRaj} Bollaram Village^{Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District}

¶13

N.Balaii. S/o. Late^{N.Pandu StudentR/o Ghanpur Thanda Raj Bollaram} Village'Medchal^{Mandal, Ranga Reddy District}

¶14

( RR3 to RRS declared as malor by discharging^{guardian Vice C O'} Or.+ltlZOtA in^{MACMAMP No. 3701/14)}

¶15

N.Javamma, D/o.^{Late N.Pandu Student R/o. Ghanpur Thanda Raj Bollaram} Villa[e lvledchal Mandal.^{Ranga Reddy District}

¶16

N.Leela, D/o. Late^{N.Pandu StudentFJo GhanpurThandaRaj Bollaram} Village Medchal^{lr,landal, Ranga Reddy District}

¶17

N.Narsimha,^{S/o. Late N.Pandu StudentFyo.Ghanpur Thanda Raj Bollaram} Village Medchal Mandal,^{Ranga Reddy District.}

¶18

(RR6 declared as major and discharging the^{guardianship vide C O'} at.ZABtZOlt in MACIvIAMP^{No.3874/201 6)}

¶19

N.Guiuramma, W/o.^{Late Devula HouseholdR/o.Ghanpur ThandaRaj} Bollaiam Village Medchal^{Mandal, Ranga Reddy District}

¶20

M.Satyanarayana Goud, S/o.^{Balaiah Goud Business R/o.1-64 Vayilala} Village Jinnaram mandal Medak^District

¶21

...Respondents/Respondents

¶22

l.A. N3: 2 OF 2010(l\4AC P NO; 5628 OF 2010)

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased stay^of execution of the decree and all further^{proceedingspassed} in OP.NO.^104'1 of 2006 dated 14-5-2010 on the file of Chairman MACT /Prl. District^Judge, R,R.District at L.B.Nagar at Hyderabad.

¶24

Counsel for the Appellant(s):Sri. N.Mohan Krishna

¶25

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri P.Durga Prasad

¶26

The Cou4 made the following: Judgment

¶27

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶28

M.A.C.M.A.N o.3753 of 201.4

¶29

IUDGMENT:

¶30

Learned counsel for tlre appeliant/^{InsuranceCompany} through virtual mode seeks permission^{of this Courtto withdraw} the present appeal.

¶31

Permission is accordecl

¶32

Accordingiy, this Motor Accident Civil^{Miscellaneous} Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.^{However, this dismissal}

¶33

order will have no bearing on^{the appealif any preferred by the}

¶34

claimants.

¶35

Miscellaneou s titions, if an cli shall stand closed. ASSrsrANr Sd/- A.V.S. PRASAD7o* //TRUE COPY' SECTION OFFICER

¶36

<br>

¶37

To,

¶38

The Chairman,^{MACT/PrincipalDistrict JudgeR R District at L B Nagar'} H yderabad. (with records^{if any)}

¶39

2.o eCCto^{Sri. N. Mohan Krishna, Advocate[oPUC]}

¶40

3 o CC to Sri.^{P. Durga Prasad, Advocate[OPUC]}

¶41

4 T CD Copies

HIGF.COURT

DATED:09/08/2024

JUDGMENT

MACMA.No.3753 of 2014

¶46

o * 1HE S14 t v;6
)
0 / oEC 2024
a)
t oFc Pn;CHEp

¶47

M.^.C.M.]A IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

¶48

oA
It

¶49

--f' J'-

M/S. United India Insurance Company Ltd., v. Smt. N.Veeramma and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. United India Insurance Company Ltd., v. Smt. N.Veeramma and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Saritha Vs K. Srisailam Goud and Another

Shaik Altaf Vs Sri Syed Mahmood Hussain and Another

Syed Sadiq, Vs the State of a.P., Rep by Pp.

Suram Jayaram, Nizamabad Vs the State of a.P.,Rep.by Pp.,High Court of a.P.,Hyderabad

Iffco-Tokio General Insurance Co.Ltd., Vs Abdul Khadar and Another

Iffco-Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Smt.Bee Pasha