Injury claim arising from a motor cycle colliding with a bicycle. The Tribunal refused compensation because the FIR named a different vehicle number than that claimed. The High Court found no infirmity in the discrepancy reasoning and dismissed the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I ,lIi
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGA NA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE NINETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
MOTOR ACc IDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEO US APP EAL N0:2678 OF 2009
Appeal under section 173 of Motor Vehicres Act against the order and decree made in o.P.No.86 0F 2006 dated 20 03.2009 0n the rite or tne court of the chairman, Motor Accident craims Tribunar -cum- r Additionar oistiict Luoge, xnammim Diri;i;i-
Between:
Bachalakura Andhra Babu
... Petitioner/Appellant
AND
Counsel for the Appellant Mr Kowuri Krishna Kishore, Advocate
Counsel for the Respondent No 1 :None appeared
Counsel for the Respondent No 2 p.Bhanu prakash, Advocate
The Court delivered the fo owrng JUDGMENT .
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
M.A.C.M.A No.2678 OF 2OO9
JUDGMENT:
I I
2
.\
said discrepancy. I do not find any infirmity in the frnding of the
Tribunal.
applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
Sd/. MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTAN REGISTRAR
\
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
tf-
HIGH COURT
DATED: 09.09.2024
JUDGMENT + DECREE
MACMA.No. 2678 of 2009
'{ 'riE STA f€:
))
q -:
of,
t s NB! ?ul
'J
,:"
I1r <- - "_ '. f,
DISMISSING THE MACMA
IcopfA
.ff.er
IN THE H]GH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE NINETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEK.SURENDER
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVILMIS CELLANEOUSAPPEALNO:2678 OF m09
Between:
Bachalakura Andhra Babu
Petitioner/Appellant
AND
Appeal under section 173 of MotorVehicles Act against the order and decree made in o.P.No.86 0F 2006dated 20 03.2009 0n the file of the court of the chairman, Motor Accident claimsTribunal -cum-I Additional District Judge, Khammam District.
ORDER: This appeal comingon for hearingand upon perusingthe groundsof appeal' the Judgment and Decree of theLower court andthe materialpapers in the case and upon helring the arguments ofMR Kovvuri Krishna Kishore, Advocate for the appellant and for the iespondentno..1 none appeared and for the respondent No.2 Mr. PBhanu Prakash, Advocale.
This Court doth Order andDecree as follows
Sd/. MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTA REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
2 Two CD Copies
\q--
HIGH COURT
DATED: 09.09.2024
JUDGMENT + DECREE
MACMA.No. 2678 of 2009
DISMISSING THE MACMA.
qLof€6 Fr, fl6h
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Tribunal rightly refused compensation because the FIR named a different motor cycle than the one claimed in the petition?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bachalakura Andhra Babu
Bajjuri Ram Reddy S/o Koti Reddy (Owner of Motor Cycle bearing No. AP-20-J-2861)
The National Insurance Company Limited, Branch Office, Wyra Road, Khammam
K.Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
