M.Sagar Reddy, v. Nyayapathi Vani
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed the criminal revision as infructuous, noting the matter ought to have been pursued via appeal.
High Court dismissed the criminal revision as infructuous, noting the matter ought to have been pursued via appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32sl I
I I I : { I i J I i II i!
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OFSEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEK.SURENDER
CRIMINA L REVISION CASE NO: 2032 OF2010
Between:
M.Sagar Reddy, S/o. Laxma Reddy,Aged about38 years' Occ. Business,r/o. H.No. 3-10-5, Gokelenagar, Ramanthapur,Hyderabad
...Petitioner / Complainant
AND
...Respondent / Accused
Revision filed under Section397 & 401 of Cr.P.Cprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled in supportof the criminalRevision Case, the High Court may bepleased to enhance the sentence from SIX months to two years andgrant compensationof the double the chequeamountunder section 357 (3) Cr.P.C., while appreciatingthe iudgmentin C.C.No-8 of 2007 dated 30.06.2010 on the file ofthe lll MetropolitanMagistrate' Cyberabad, L.B.Nagar Ranga ReddY District.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRIK. Anthony Reddy
Counsel for the Respondents: PublicProsecutor
The Court made the following Order:-
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER,
Crl.R.C No. 2032 0F 2oLO
ORDER:
2 . As seen from the record, the complainant ough t to have filed an Appeal and not the Revision Case. However, keeping in view the submission made by the learned counsel lor the revision petitioner, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
3 Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stanci
clo secl
/IrRuE coPY"
'ec,Jr'iorrrcen
To,
The lllMetropolitan Magistrate' Cyberabad'L B Nagar' RangareddyDistrict
OneCC to SRI K Anthony Reddy' Advocate [OPUC]
\iC,'sh YV
I
i l
HIGH COURT
DATED:0910912024
ORDER
CRLRC.N0.2032 ot 2010
1 IE: T r6'
( o,,:
'r
J
0 t 0t:[ 2!2q C
!-r,.,, ,,
_:.:_i.,
DISMISSING AS INFRUCTUOUS OF THE CRLRC
4-CoP\ot Prflil*t
M. Sagar Reddy
Nyayapathi Vani
The State of Andhra Pradesh
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court