Dismissed

Mr.Malluvalasa John v. Smt. Mekala Rudhraksha Veni

Telangana HC18 Oct 2024CRLRC/969/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana allowed the criminal revision filed under Sections 438 and 442 CrPC to be withdrawn with the consent of the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Consequently, the revision was dismissed, liberty to seek alternative remedy was given.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the revision was accorded and the case was dismissed as withdrawn.

Mr.Malluvalasa John Vs Smt. Mekala Rudhraksha Veni — Bail and Remand | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[^32ee ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶6

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 969 OF 2024

¶7

Criminal Revision filed under Section 438 and 442 Cr.P .C., against the order dated 24.04.2024 in CRL M.P.No.24 o'f 2024 in Crl.A.No. 85 oI 2024 on the file of the Court of the V Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at LB Nagar

¶8

Between:

¶9

Mr. Malluvalasa John, S/o Malluvalasa Apparao Age: 35 years, Occ: Technician, R/o Flat No. 103, First floor, H.No.2-4-91103, Snehapuri colony nagole, Uppal mandal, Medchal malkajgiri District, State of Telangana.

¶10

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶11

AND

¶12

Smt. f\rlekala Rudhraksha Veni, Wo Ayyappuraju Rajeev, Age 42 years, occ: Software employee, Rio H.No.11-13-204, Alkapuri, saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District, State of Telangana Smt. Malluvalasa Sai^jyothi Wo lvlalluvalasa John, (not neccessary panylAl is acquittal)

¶13

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶14

The HyderabadState^{of Telangana,throughPublic Prosecutor at High Court at}

¶15

... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. GANJI LAKSHMI

¶17

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI E.GANESH, Asst. Public Prosecutor

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

¶20

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.969 of2024

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

This Criminal Revision Case is hled aggricved by. the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.24 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.gS of 2024 daLed 24.04-2024 on the hle of rearned v Additionar Metroporitan Sessions Judge, Ranga Recldy District at L.B.Nagar.

¶23

When the ma[ter is taken-up for hearing, Ms. G. Lakshmi, learned counsel for revision petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this revision case.

¶24

Permission is accorded

¶25

Learned Assistant public prosecutor appcaring for the

¶26

respondent-State takes no objection for the same.

¶27

Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn. It is needress to mention that the revision petitioner is at

¶28

liberty to avail alternative remedy in accordance with law.

¶29

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal appeal,

¶30

shall also sta cl

¶31

¶32

I Sd/. M. MANJULA I

¶33

1 //TRUE COPYII os"ulrlgEEl J^{' secrroru oFFlcER}

¶34

To 1. TheVAdditionat ropolitan Sessions Judge, Rang a Reddy District at

¶35

L.B.Nagar

¶36

2 The Metro potitan il,lasistrate, Ranga Redd y District at L.B.Nagar.

¶37

3 Two CCs to the Publ ic Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (our)il

¶38

4.5. Two One CC toCD Copies SRI GAI NJI LAKSHMt, Advocate tOpUCl

¶39

Pr/gh ?A-

HIGH^COURT

DATED:^1811012024

ORDER

CRLRG.No.969^o12024

1i 6f. STA1 e
t
d so Nrr zrzs
lI
i
.t
0eS PATG e9

¶47

DISMISSING THE CRL.RC

¶48

AS WITHDRAWN (o-

¶49

li \r-f "

Mr.Malluvalasa John v. Smt. Mekala Rudhraksha Veni

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr.Malluvalasa John v. Smt. Mekala Rudhraksha Veni

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rathod Lalu Singh , Lalu Vs the State of a.P., Throug the Sho., P.S.

Thati Anup Kumar Vs Smt. Akshitha Annanm

Nomula Srinivas Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana

Ghattupalli @ Golla Suresh, Vs The State of Telangana

Mrs. B.Vasanthi Vs the State of A.P. and Another

Mrs. B. Vasanthi, Hyderabad. Vs the State of a.P., Rep. by P.P., Hyderabad, and Anr.