This is a Criminal Revision filed with the Telangana High Court. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court granted the leave to withdraw and dismissed the criminal revision case as withdrawn, closing pending miscellaneous petitions.
Permission accorded to withdraw; Criminal Revision dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ee ]
IN THE HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY,THESEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEE.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:594oF 2024
Criminal Revisionfiled under Section 397& 401 of Cr.PC aggrieved by the order dated 22102t2024passed in criminal Appeal No 35 of 2023 on the file of learned lAdditionalFamilycourt cumXIV AdditionalMetropolitansessions court Hyderabad..
Between:
Thati Anup Kumar.S/o. ThatiShyam -Kumaf .Age35 years'Occ Business R/o H No 88 "noa6]Arnil"*;'F;tt ranJo"i1q"-^s^qgncersuper Market Cippo.it" iopittar Number 125Attapur, Hyderabad 500028
...Revision Petitioner/AppellanURespondent'
AND
... Respondents/Respondents/Petitioner'
IA NO: 3 OF2024
PetitionunderSectlonl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavitfiled rn support of the petition,tne lrgfrCourt may be pleased.to ,r.p""J tn"operation oi the order 22tO212O24in CRLA No.35 of 2023 before the lAddl.FamilyCourtCumXlVAddl-MetropolitansessionsCourt,Hyderabadat kukatf alry,pendingfinal adjudication of the present Revision'
:l I I i I I I II I I t I i
l II I I
/
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to receive and take on record the additional documLnts filed by the petitioner.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. S. KOUSTUBH LEARNED COUNSEL
REPRESENTING M/S INDUS LAW FIRM
Counsel for the Respondent: SRt E. GANESH ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following: ORDER:-
I
l II I I 1 I ii
i I jI I I I I I i I i
./
/,"
lt
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No 694 oF 20/24
ORDER:
Mr. S. Koustubh, learned counsel representing M/s.Indus Law Firm, counsel for the petitioner submits that no further orders are required in this Revision and therefore, seeks permission of this court to withdraw the Revision. Learned counser endorsed the same on the bundle.
I
petitioner, this criminal Revision case is dismissed as withdrawn.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- M. RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECT OFFICER
To,
qr
/
HIGH COURT
DATED:1711012024
ORDER
1l si r.4
JR
)+
z
2 il ft[ 20a
o
: o€.9 c,1 1 qv17-) *
CRLRC.No.594 ot 2024
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE IS DISMISSED
?+ 7T;l>'1 JCaP'l;'
Thati Anup Kumar
Smt Akshitha Annan
The State of Telangana
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
