Dismissed

Md.Ghouse v. Zaheda Begum and the State of A.P. Rep., by Its Pp

Telangana HC9 Dec 2024CRLRC/799/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed a Criminal Revision case instituted by Md. Ghouse against a lower court order in a domestic matter. The Court found that the petitioner failed to appear or represent himself on the list date captioned for dismissal. Consequently, the petition was abandoned due to lack of prosecution.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Revision Case No. 799 of 2012 dismissed for non-prosecution.

Md.Ghouse Vs Zaheda Begum and the State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.^VENUGOPAL

¶5

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:799^{OF 2012}

¶6

Criminal Revision Case 397 &^{4Ol of Cr.P.Cagainst the Order made in} Crl.M.P.No.112 of 2OrO in M.C.No.44 of 1990^{dated18.04-2012on the file of the} Family Court Cum Additional District^{Courtat Mahaboobnagar.} Between:

¶7

Md.Ghouse, S/o. Dastagiri, Sr.Assistant,^{D.M. and Head Officer, MahaboobNagar'} Now at P.H.C. Peddamaddur, Mahaboobnaga

¶8

..'ET'T'ONER

¶9

AND

¶10

1 Zaheda Begum Wo. Md.Ghouse,^{Househoh,R/o- Old Palamoor,} Mahaboobnagat'

¶11

...RES'.NDENT/..M'LA.NANT

¶12

2 The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by^{its Public Prosecutor, High Court} Buitdings, High court of A.P., at Hyderabad

¶13

...REspoNDENT/RESpoNDENT

¶14

CRL.R. C.M.P. NO: '1248OF 2012

¶15

Petition under section 151 CPC^{praying that in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High Court may be pleasedto} stay all further proceedings by^{recall the order passedby the Lowercourt on} 18.O4.2012 in Crl.M.P.No.1¹² ot^{2010 in M.c.No.44of 1990 on the file of Family} Court-Cum-Additional District Court^at Mahaboobnagar^{and suspendthe same'}

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner^{: SRl. MD. AFZAL (not present)}

¶17

Counsel for the Respondent No.2:^{SRI E.GANESH,}

¶18

ASSISTANT PUBLIC^PROSECUTOR

¶19

The Court made the following:^ORDER

, I

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEE.V. VENUGOPAL} CRIMINAL REVISION^{CASENo.799OF 2OL2}

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

The present Criminal^{RevisionCase is filed againstthe} order dated lB.O4.2Ol2^{inCrl.M.P.No.111lof2O1O in} M.C.No.44 of^{199Oon the file of Family Court-cum-Additional} District Court, Mahaboob^Nagar.

¶26

There is no representation^{onbehalf ofrevision} petitioner. Learned Assistant^{Public Prosecutor is present'}

¶27

On the last date of^{hearing, when the matter was taken} up for hearing, there^{was no representation on behalfof} revision petitioner,^{therefore,the matter was directed to be} posted to today under the^{captionfor dismissal'.In spiteof} matter being listed today^{under the caption for dismissal',} there is no representation^{on behalf of revisionpetitioner'} This shows that the revision^{petitioneris not evincing any} interest in^{prosecutingthe case.Therefore, this Revision is} Iiable to be dismissed^{for non-prosecution.}

¶28

Accorclingly, this Criminal^{RevisionCase is dismissed} for non-prosecution

¶29

¶30

Miscellaneous petitions, pending if arry, shall stand

¶31

closed.

¶32

Sd,- M. MANJULA DE REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY'/

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1- The Family Court Cum Additional^{District Court at Mahaboobnagar-}

¶37

One CC to Sri Md.Afzal , Advocate^(OPUC)

¶38

Two CCs to Public Prosecutor,^{High Court for the Stateof Telanganaat} Hyderabad.(OUT)

¶39

Two CD Copies

Ks/gh

HIGH^COURT

DATED:0911212024

ORDER

zf1. ,-.!.1- tut s,-a 14
1 2 F[i ir]25
()zo
l,

Dc Sjp,:,;Ctl EO

¶45

CRL.R.C.No.799^{of 2012}

¶46

Dismissing^{the Crl.R.C for} Non Prosecution.

Md.Ghouse v. Zaheda Begum and the State of A.P. Rep., by Its Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md.Ghouse v. Zaheda Begum and the State of A.P. Rep., by Its Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manjunath Vs S. Anusha @ Lahari

Pampari. Uday Kiran Vs The State of Telangana

V. Satyanarayana Goud Vs P.v.Ravi Shekar Reddy

Sampangi Narsimlu, and 2 Others, Vs the State of Ap Rep by Its Pp Hyd.

Jenigala Mahesh Yadav Vs v Nikhila

Palavarapu Shailaja Vs The State of Telangana