Dismissed

Jenigala Mahesh Yadav v. v Nikhila

Telangana HC9 Dec 2024CRLRC/759/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Criminal Revision Case involved applicants seeking a stay of family court proceedings. The High Court permitted the withdrawal of the revision petition with liberty to file a fresh application later and dismissed the matter as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the revision petition with liberty to file a fresh application was granted. The case is dismissed as withdrawn.

Jenigala Mahesh Yadav Vs v Nikhila — Telangana HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

[,ONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR-

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶5

CRIMINAL REVIS ION CASE NO: 759 OF 2024

¶6

Criminal Revision Case 392 & 401 ot Cr.p.C against the Order made in crr'M.P.No.97 0r 2024 in M.c.No.107 0t 2023 dated 04.07.2024 0n the fire of the Family court cum principar District & sessions court at Medchar Markajgiri.

¶7

Between:

¶8

Jenigala Mahesh yr.tr, g9._!ate- Jenigala Eadaiah, aged 28 years. Occ 9 #63i6'05,^{irJili3?6s, TU' c"rb"t:6;,iii"i"6ii;",i1} ffft?:ilfl 'ry;;,X']: _RESpoNDENT/REVtstoN pETtTtoNER

¶9

_RESpoNDENT/REVtstoN pETtTtoNER A

¶10

V Nikhita, Wio Jenioata fvJgfrgs!_Va!a-v, D/o V Sai Reddy, Aged about22 Rro - n n" +s-+zorisl'5,ffi rfi rrL,ir:-i,i il.Lifr r

¶11

J,:m;#n ||,dentl "grr, " "

¶12

"grr, "

¶13

1. The State of Telanoana. Rep by its public prosecutor, High Court for the State of Tetangana"At HyOeiablJ-

¶14

M. c. N o. 1 0 7 or zo23 be ro re rh e r. ".^{i:F5tIS [o.t THJ:F]j If,Ii[, lI}

¶15

lA NO: 1 oF 2024

¶16

Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay of proceedings in M.c.107 0f 2023 by the Famiry court-cum-principar District and Sessions Court at Medchal Malkajgiri Court.

¶17

Counsel for the petitioner : SRl. VARUN KUMAR E

¶18

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI C. HARI PREETH

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI E.GANESH,

¶20

ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL} CRIMINAL^{REVISTONCASE No.7s9 0F 2024}

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

Mr. E. Varun^{Kumar, learned counsel for the revision} petitioner, seeJ<s^{permission of this Court to withdraw the} Revision lr'ith^{liberty to hle fresh applicra'tion a't an} appropriate time.^{Learnedcounsel endorsedthe same on} the bundle.

¶25

Permission^{as soughtfor is accorded'}

¶26

Ms. tr. Ganesh,^{Iearned Assistant PublicProsecutor} takes no objection^{to the same.}

¶27

Recordirrg the^{submissionsmade by learned counsel for} the revision^{petitioner,thisCriminai Revision Case is} dismissed as^{',vithdrawn grantingliberty as soughtfor'}

¶28

Miscellaneous Petitions,^{pending ifa-ny, shall stand}

¶29

closed.

¶30

/ITRUE COPY//

¶31

Sd/. M. MANJULA DEPUW ICTION OFFICERREGISTRAR

¶32

to'',. ,n" Principal District & Sessions Judge-Cum-Family Cou(' Medchal Malkaigiri District^{at Malkaisiri'}

¶33

z. one'd6 tosri^{E.Varun Ku'riar' Advocatt (otu!)r,r,"}

¶34

of Tetangana^at

¶35

il; cc. io^{p;uoti. Prosecutor,Highcourt for the} Hyderabad.(OUT)

¶36

Two CD Copi Ksigh

HIGH COURT

DATED:0911212024

ORDER

CRL.R.C.No.759^{of 2O24}

¶41

Dismissing the^{Crl.R.C as} Withdrawn.

Jenigala Mahesh Yadav v. v Nikhila

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jenigala Mahesh Yadav v. v Nikhila

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manjunath Vs S. Anusha @ Lahari

Pampari. Uday Kiran Vs The State of Telangana

V. Satyanarayana Goud Vs P.v.Ravi Shekar Reddy

Sampangi Narsimlu, and 2 Others, Vs the State of Ap Rep by Its Pp Hyd.

Palavarapu Shailaja Vs The State of Telangana

Md.Ghouse Vs Zaheda Begum and the State of A.P. Rep., by Its Pp