Dismissed

Jaspal Singh Sachdeva v. Master Harbhajan Singh Sachdeva and 2 Others

Telangana HC5 Mar 2024CRLRC/777/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal revision petition filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C against an interim order in a metro court. Petitioner argued the subject matter no longer survives and further orders were unnecessary. The court accepted this submission and dismissed the revision as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Revision Case No.777 of 2013 dismissed as infructuous. Pending miscellaneous petitions closed.

Jaspal Singh Sachdeva Vs Master Harbhajan Singh… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

RESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶5

CRIMINA L REVISION CASE N O:7 77 0F 2013

¶6

Criminal Revision Case under Section 397 and 401 of Cr_p.C aggrieved by the order dated: 4-3-2013 passed in Crl.M.p.No.75l2013 in mbin MC tSO ot 2012 on the file of the court of the Addl. Metropolitan sessions Judge for trial of JHBBC-Cum- Addl. Family court-cum-XXlll Addl. Chief Judge, Hyderabad.

¶7

Between:

¶8

Jaspal .Singh Sachdeva, S/o Abnash Singh, R/o.Flat No.202, Sri Sai Aprts., Manovikas Nagar, Bowenpally, Hyderabad.^-

¶9

...Revision Petitioner

¶10

AND

¶11

'1. Master Harbhajan Singh Sachdeva, S/o.Jaspal Singh Sachdeva,

¶12

Smt.Manmeet Kaur,, W/o.Jaspal Singh, Sachdeva, Resp. No.1 is minor under the care.and_ c^us-tgqy ^of resp No.2 who is his natural mother all are residing at House No.21-2-290, Charmahal, Hyderabad.

¶13

The State of A.P., Rep. by its P.P, High Court of A.p., Hyderabad.

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

I.A NO: 10F 2013tCRL CMP. NO: 1 200 0F 20't3l

¶16

Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all fu(her proceedings including the implementation of interim orders passed by Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge for kial of JHBBC Cum Addl. Family Court, in Crl.MP No.75 of 2013 in main M.C No.3B0 of 2012 dt.4.3.2013.

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SYED, FOR

¶18

SRI MOHD MUZAFFER ULLAH KHAN

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI VIZARATH ALl,

¶20

ASST. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶21

Counsel fbr the Respondent Nosl & 2: SRt K SURESH REDDY

¶22

The Court made the following: OROER

¶23

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{E. V. VENUGOPAL}

¶24

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.777^{OF 2013}

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

t \

¶27

The present Criminal Revision^{Case is fiIed aggrieved by} the order dated 04.03.2013 in^{Crl.M.P.No.75 of 2013 in} M.C.No.38O of 2Ol2^passed by the^{learned Additional} Metropolitan Sessions Judge for^{the trial of Jubilee Hills car} Bomb Blast Cases-cum-Add1. Family^{Court-cum-XXIII} Additional Chief Judge, Hyderabad

¶28

Heard Mr. Syed, learned^{counselrepresenting} Mr. Mohd Muzaffer Ullah Khan, Iearned counsel^{for the} revlston petitioner and Mr. Yizarath^{Ali, learnedAssistant} Public Prosecutor appearing for^{respondent-State.}

¶29

l,earned counsel for the revision petitioner would submit that the subject matter of the^{Re'risiondoesn't surviveand no} further orders are required in this^{Revision. Therefore,seeks} to dismiss the Revision as infructuous.

¶30

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor has not objected to

¶31

the same

¶32

¶33

In view of the above, this Criminal Revision Case is

¶34

dismissed as infructuous.

¶35

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand

¶36

closed.

¶37

Sd/- CH.VENKATES w DEPUTY^REG //TRUE^COPY// sEcTloN^o ER

¶38

To,

¶39

The^{Addl.MetropolitanSessions J-'d.S: fo', trial of JHBBC-Cum-Addl'} Family^{court-crr-xfiiriioi.-c-nulJ"udse'Hvderabad(with records' if}

¶40

to PUBLIC^{PRoSECUToR'Highcourtfor the state of relangana}

¶41

, -' ?lr'J at Hyderabad "". lOUTl

¶42

One^{CC to SRIMOHD MUZAFFER ULLAH KHAN' Advocate [OPUC]}

¶43

One^{CC to SRI K'SURESHREDDYAdvocate IOPUCI}

¶44

Two^{CD coPies'}

Cvkrghw

\ \

HIGH COURT

DATED:0510312024

ORDER

CRLRC.No.777 of 2013

HE S i4I e'
3 )q 1I itAY 2ox (I <br>J
+i
t O6'.S PArctreo ,

¶52

CRL RC IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS.

¶53

a .*k
tr--

Jaspal Singh Sachdeva v. Master Harbhajan Singh Sachdeva and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jaspal Singh Sachdeva v. Master Harbhajan Singh Sachdeva and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. K. Sudha, and 3 Others, Vs K. Satya Narayana, and Another

Md.Muzammil, Nizamabad Dt., Vs State of Telangana, Rep Pp.

C.Jangaiah, Vs the State of Ap Rep by Its Pp Hyd.

Mr. Pallati Narsimhulu Vs Smt. v. Aruna., I.A.S.

K.Issac Vs a.Ashok Kumar

D.Achyutha Reddy, Vs the State of Ap Rep by Its Pp Hyd., and Another