Disposed

Bheema Bala Krishna v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC5 Sept 2024CRLRC/562/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Criminal Revision Case challenging a discharge petition dismissal, the High Court of Telangana dispensed with the attendance of the accused-petitioner for trial proceedings, subject to filing an affidavit and undertaking to appear when directed by the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Attendance of petitioner-accused in C.C. No. 616 of 2022 dispensed with conditional upon filing affidavit and undertaking; petitioner to appear as and when directed.

Bheema Bala Krishna Vs The State of Telangana — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[^32se ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEI/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶6

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 5 620F 2023

¶7

criminar Revision case fired under section 3g7 and 401 0f cr_pc aqainst the Order dated 20_07_2023-made;; C;Mn'N;343 of 2023 in C.C.N.6i6 of 2022 on the fire of the court ot tne .luJicrai rii.i'ciili'na"gistrate, Atmakur.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Bheema Bala Krishna. S/o. Late Ramulu. Business, R/o Kothakora viltase and rrrri"o,i wii,ii,ritibi.iii.t-^{aged about67 years,} Occ

¶10

... Petitioner/Accused

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telanoana. ren. by its pubhcprosecutor, High Court for the State of relangan at Hyd-erabad iepri:senting Fs. i",iJi"it'"r wanaparthy District.

¶13

2 The D,strict Civil Supply Officer, Wanaparthy District, Wanaparthy.

¶14

...Respondents/Complainant

¶15

lA NO: 1 oF 2023

¶16

Petition under Section 492 0f cr-p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the p"iition the High court mav -oe pleased to stay of aI further proceedings in c.c. No. 616 ot 2022 on the fire of the Judicial First crass Magistrate, Atmakui inctuoing appearance of the petitioner.

¶17

Counsel for the petitioner : Sri M Damodar Reddy

¶18

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Ms. S Madhavi, Assistant Public^prosecutor

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

, I

¶21

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL}

¶22

CRIMINAL REVISI^{ON CASENo. s62 of 2023}

¶23

ORDER

¶24

This Criminal^{Revision Case is filed aggrievecby the order dated} 2O.O7.2Ci23 in^{Crl.l{. P.No.343 of 2023 in C'C No'616 of 2022 on the Iile of} the learned^{Jucli<:irri First Class Magistrate,Atmakurin} d Lsmissing lhe discharge^{petition filed by the petitioner(for short'"the trial Court")}

¶25

Heard Mr. M^{llamodar Reddy,learned counsel appealing on behalf} of the revision^{petitioner and Ms' S' Madhavi, learnedAssistant Public} Prosecutor for^{the S tate}

¶26

¶27

After arguing for^{sometime, whbn this Court has expressed its} opinion stating^{that the said contentions are disputed quesl ions of fact} whichneedtobegtlneintobythelearnedtrialCourt,learnedcounsellor the petitioner^{restrictedhis prayer to the extent of rlispensingwith the} presence ol the^{petitionerbeforethe learnedtrial Court'}

¶28

4.Considering.hesubmissionoflearnedcounselforthepetitioner,the attendance of^{thr: petitioner-Accusedis dispensedrvith inC C No 616 of} 2022 pending^{on the hle of the learneclJudicial FirstCla ss Magistrate'} Atmakur,^{urhenr(rF,resentedby his counselon record The attr:ndanceof the} petitioner-accuserl^{dispensed with subject tofiling an aflldavil by the} petitioner stating ,hat^{in his absence, the proceedings conCucledby his} counsel will not^{be disputed by him in any manner and shall not disputehis} identity also. Ho'*a:ver,^{the petitioner-accusedshall appearbefore learned} Magistrateasan<.Iwhelrhispresenceisrequired.lntheeventoffailureof

¶29

¶30

the petitioner to appear when the Court directs, this order dispensing wita his attendance shall stand cancelled

¶31

Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of

¶32

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Criminal Revision

¶33

Case shall also stand closed.

¶34

, Sd/. K. SAILESHI DEPU Y REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

ECTION OFFICER

To,

The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Atmakur

¶39

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court^{for the State of Telanganaat} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶40

One CC to Sri M Damodar Reddy.^Advocate [OPUC]

¶41

Two CD Copies

ADt(gh

)

HIGH COURT

DATED:0510912024

ORDER

CRLRC.No.562^{of 2023}

¶50

n:- S
(r(
2 0 ti,B 2$25
*
- r . .,-riE i

¶51

DISPOSING^{OF THE CRLRC}

¶52

I ,3
+

Bheema Bala Krishna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bheema Bala Krishna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Potukuchi Pushya Vs The State of the Telangana

Parle Agro Vs Prl.Secy., Home Dept. Hyd., and Another

Mokalla Ravi and 4 Others Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Dasari Sudhakar Vs Dasari Prasanna Kumari

J.S.R. Durga Prasad Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others

The Deputy Commissioner Vs State of Telangana