A criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. challenging an interlocutory order dismissing a petition for return of property under Section 451 Cr.P.C. was held not maintainable, leading to the dismissal of the revision.
Revision dismissed as not maintainable; order of the learned Magistrate affirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THEFOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL REVISION CASENO2337 0F 2010
Revision filed undersection 397 & 401 of cr.P.C. aggrieved by the Docket order madein crl.M.P. No. 3681of 20,10in Crime No.160 of 2010' dated 2-12-2010, on thefile of the Judicial First class Magistrate Huzurnagar,(FAC) Kodada, NalgondaDistrict.
Between:
Madipally Varalaxmi,Wo Venkanna, Aoriculture, R/oH.No. 1 -93, Li"ngampally(V), Noothankal(M),
... Revision Petitioner
AND
l.A. NO:1O F 2010(cRLRCMP. NO:3518OF 2010)
PetitionunderSection4S2Rtw.45.lCr.P.C.,prayingthatinthe circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled in supportof the petition,the High Court may bepleasedto releasethe vehicle Tractor BearingNo AP 24 TLTR.48B5 in crimeNo.160 of 2010 of PS.,Munagalato the petitioner/ True Owner.
For the Petitioner: Sri D. Kanaka Sundar,Advocate
For the RespondentNo.1: The Public Prosecutor
The Court made thefollowing: ORDER
1
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL RwISION CASE No.2337 OF 2O1O ORDER:
This Criminal Revision Case is {iled by the revision petitioner aggrieved by the order dated O2,.l2.2OlO in Cr1.M.P.No.3681 of 2010, on the file of the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Huzurnagar (FAC) Kodad, Nalgonda District.
2
5 In view of the above, the CriminalRevisionCaseis
dismissed as not maintainable.
,*iq{iy!+HkA
,ITRUECOPY"
SECTIONOFFICER
To, 1. TheJudiciar Firstclass Magistrate Huzurnagar'(FAc)Kodada' Nalgonda
w
--'3"--,: ftii'':,...:.!'. - &r,-! "
!,
HIGH COURT
DATED'.41912024
ORDER
-( ir' E s 14
U 1 s [E[ Z02t
a
* *
PAT 6-O
CRLRC.No.2337 of 2010
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE IS DISMISSED
g cr(o/:
s'l"
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a revision under Section 397 Cr.P.C. is maintainable against an interlocutory order dismissing a petition for return of property.
Whether the trial court's order under Section 451 Cr.P.C. was based on sufficient grounds.
4 provisions across 1 enactments
Madipally Varalaxmi
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Kommu Ramesh
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
