Dismissed

Mr. Sushil Mehta, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC13 Aug 2024CRLRC/2050/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a criminal revision filed by the accused seeking to set aside an order dismissing an application for cancellation of non-bailable warrants. The Court held that the impugned order being interlocutory, it was not maintainable under Section 397 Cr.P.C. and is liable to be quashed.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Revision Case dismissed as the impugned order is interlocutory and maintainable.

Mr. Sushil Mehta, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

NorE : The Petitioner/ Accused was directed to be rereased on bair by the order of the High court dated 09.1'1.2010 in crr.R.c.A/r.p.Nro. gorz ot zoiol; Crr.R.clN.. 2050 o'f 2010.

¶2

[³²⁵¹ ]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶4

TUESDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶7

CRIMINAL REVISI ON CASE NO: 2050 0F 2010

¶8

criminal Revision case fired under sections 392 & 401 of cr.p.c., aqainst the order dated- 07.1o.2o10 passed in crr.r\r.p.No. titi otloto, d c.r.,ri 6Eti)db, on the file of the court of the Judiciar lVagistrate of First ctass, at Rrmooi

¶9

Between:

¶10

Mr' Sushil Mehta, Managh-g ,Director of lvr/s. RFCL Limited, R/o. tvA-1i62, Garden Estate, Gurgaon_lZlOOl , HyderabJd

¶11

...^{petitioner/petitioner/Accused} No.6

¶12

¶13

'1 . State of Andhra Pradesh, .^{Rep.by the publicprosecutor, High Court} of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad_

¶14

The Drug lnspector, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District

¶15

...Respondents/Respondents/ Complainant

¶16

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2010(CRLRCMP. NO: 3012 0F 2010)

¶17

Petition under section 492 of cr.p.c., praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandurn of grounds in support-of the petition, tn" irjt torrt Tay.bg^{p]egsedto stayall further proceedings in cc No. 98} of 2009, on t"he file of the Judicial Magistrate of First crass, at Arm-oor, Nizamabad District, inctuainj irre personal appearance of the petitioner herein/Accused No. 6, pending disposlat of the above Criminal Revision Case.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri C.R. Sridharan

¶19

Counsel for Respondent no.1 : Additional public prosecutor

¶20

Counsel for Respondent No. 2 : None appeared

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

¶23

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶24

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2OSO OF 2O1O

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') by the petitioner/accused No.6 to set aside the order dated 07.10.201O in Crl.M.P.No.1214 of 2OlO in C.C.No.9S of 2OO9 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Armoor, Nizamabad District.

¶27

Heard learned counsel for the revision petitioner, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondentState and perused the record

¶28

The learned Magistrate has dismissed the application filed under Section 70(21 of Cr.P.C by the revision petitioner seeking cancellation of NBWs issued against him- The said order is an interlocutory order. This Court is prohibited from entertaining revlslon against interiocutory order under Section 397(2) of Cr.P.C

¶29

Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is

¶30

dismissed.

¶31

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall

¶32

stand closed

¶33

Sd/- M. RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY REGISTRAR

¶34

//TRUE COPY// 4v, SECTIO4( OFFICER

¶35

To,

¶36

'l . The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at Armoor. (with records)

¶37

The Drug lnspector, Nizamabad,^{NizamabadDistrict.}

¶38

Two CC; to the Public^{Prosecutor,High Court for the State of Telangana at} Hyderabad. (OUT)

¶39

Ohe CC to Sri C.R. Sridharan,^Advocate IOPUCI

5 Two CD CoPies

N.ibigh

CHF

I I

HIGH COURT

DATE D: 1 310812024

/-- -.-
e'- 1 {}- '' lrl l' F
( o
i)
u
(-) 0 Ii t, I 124 o
?- L
.\ a
. - a),
a:,--

ORDER

CRLRC.No.2050 of²⁰¹⁰

DISMISSING THE CRLRC

a,iie
?'

Mr. Sushil Mehta, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Sushil Mehta, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Abdullah Munawar, Vs M/s. Sri Balaji Agencies

Smt. M. Chandrakala, Vs the State of Ap Rep by Its Pp Hyd.

P. Jaya Prakash, Hyderabad. Vs the State of a.P., through P.P., Hyderabad.

G.Narayana Rao, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Gajjala Konda Reddy and Another Vs Mrs. Ravi Sarojini and Another

Manula Brahma Naidu, Vs the Stateof as.P., Rep. by Its P.P.