The revision petitioner sought to set aside an order in a lower court proceeding. Both counsel submitted that the main criminal case had been dismissed, rendering the revision infructuous. The Court dismissed the revision as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIM| NAL REVISION CASE NO: 1444 OF 2013
Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 40 1 of Cr.P.C aggrieved bythe order dt: 2-2-2011 passed in Crl.MP.No.114l2O11 in CC No.258/2010 on the file of the court of the Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class for Trial of
Prohibition & Excise Offences, at Nizamabad.
Between:
T.Gangadhar, S/o Late Rajaiah,Aged 48 years, Occ:Advocate R/o Gurbabadi, Dubba, Nizamabad-503002.
...Revision Petitioner/(Complainant in CG.No.258/20'l 0)
AND
...Respondent
...RESPONDENT/Accused.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(CRLRCMP. NO:2217 OF 2013
Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to stay all further proceedings of lhe Trial Court in CC No.258/2010 Q&QA0IP( on the file of the Special JFCM., for trial of Pro. & Excise offences, Nizamabad.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. Y.S.YELLA NAND GUPTA
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI KHAJA VIZARATH ALl,
ASST. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(TG)
The Court made the following: ORDER
1
\ \
/
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL REVISIONCASE No.1 444 0F 20L3
ORDER:
The present CriminalRevision Case is frled seekingto set aside theorder dated O2'O2'2O11 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1t4of 2Ol1 in C.C.No.258of 201O on the hle of learned specialJudicialMagistrate of First class for Trial of Prohibition &Excise Offences,Nizambad'
2
Revision Case as infructuous.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand
closed.
sd7-1.1\IOOO T I t DEPUTYRE ,/TRUECOPY// SECTIONOF CER
To,
Cvldgh
FY,
HIGH COURT
DATED:0610312024
ORDER
CRLRC.N o.1444 of 2013
?----'7:=a:-A
rL 1 \1E c li1 r,-
o
k
(..
p t<br>tj.)
IJ 0 6 IAI 202[ .|.n ')
.L
;,. /
* +
DESPAT 9C
CRLRC IS DISMISSEDAS INFRUCTUOUS.
s.codut
w
E1--'<br>
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Revision Case survives given the dismissal of the main criminal case?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T.Gangadhar
The State of A.P.
L.Muniraj
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
