Disposed

Visanagiri Venkat Narayana Ravitej v. v. Hima Bindu

Telangana HC6 Aug 2024CRLP/8869/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Accused sought quashing of proceedings in a 2018 cheque/complaint case; counsel confined the prayer to dispensing with personal presence. The High Court dispensed with their appearance subject to representation by counsel on every hearing and directed the trial court to conclude the trial within six months.

What did the court decide?

Personal appearance of petitioners dispensed with unless required; trial court directed to dispose of C.C. No. 1313 of 2018 within six months.

Visanagiri Venkat Narayana Ravitej Vs v. Hima Bindu — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

Si:!l!.,;';t:'1,.".;':'.A!;jirq : !:41-.' il.l : r.*.iEi {. -

¶2

[^338s1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶4

TUESDAY, THE^{SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY FOUR}

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE^{SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA}

¶7

CRIMINAL PETI^{TIONNO: 8869oF 2024}

¶8

Between:

¶9

1 . Visanagiri Venkat^{Narayana Ravitei, S/o' BalakrishnaRao' age' 42 yrs' Occ'} Pvt Em-ployee, R/o^{H.No. 6-3-161, Bank Colony, Khammam District}

¶10

1. Dabbuii Rivindra^{Prasad,S/o. Late. Subba Rao, age.61 yrs, Occ.Business,} F/o H.No.56-2-711 ,^{Padamata, Vijayawada}

¶11

a^pyfa Rama^{Krishna, S/o. Late. Paddulu,age' 62 yrs, Occ Pvt Employee'Rl/o} H.No.o-e-t+0, Bank^{Colonv,Khrrrr..?:T,"i,o*=*rro"cUSED} No.1 to 3

¶12

AND

¶13

1 V. Hima Bindu,^{Wio. V.V.N. Ravitej, Age. 34 yrs, Occ' Teacher, Fl/o' H' No 5-} 363, Sularam^{Colony, Quthbullapur, Medchal-Malkajgiri, Telangana}

¶14

...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO^COMPLAINANT

¶15

2.StateofTelangana,repbyitsPublicProsecutor,HighCou(ofTelangana' Hvderabad

¶16

...RE...NDENT/..MPLA.NANT

¶17

PetitionunderSection4B2ofCr.P.Cprayingthatinthecircumstances statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofcriminalPetition,theHighcourtmay u"^pr"a.eo to call^{for the record relatingto criminal case registeredas c.c-No.} 13i3 oF 2018 on the^{file of HonourableVlll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate,} Medchal Malkajgiri District.^{At. Athivelli and quash the same in respect of the} Petitioners /Accused^{No. 1 to 3.}

¶18

l.A. NO: 2OF 2024

¶19

Petition under Secti^{on 482 of Cr.P.C} P^{raying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Grounds of Criminal Petition,theHigh Court maY be} pleased to StaY all further^{proceedings in C.C.No. 1313 OF 2018 on the file of} Hon'ble Vlll Additional^{Metropolitan Magistrate,Medchal Malkajgiri DistrictAt} Athivelli^{pending disposalof the present Criminal Petition'}

¶20

This Petition coming^{on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of} Grounds of Criminal^{Petiiionand upon hearing the argumentsof Sri. K..} T"io gnuirJ*"i, Advocate for the^petitioners and the^{publicprosecutoron behalf of} the Respondent^{No.2 and none appeared for the RespondentNo"t'}

¶21

The Court made^{the following: ORDER}

i1^,l .il

.t11i;5 -.:^{. ;}

1,;;;. -'ri.z,"^'r

THE HONOURABLE^{SMT. JUSTICEK. SUJANA} CRIMINAL^{PETITIONNo.8869of 2024}

¶26

:ORDER

¶27

In this criminal^{petition, the petitioners/ accused Nos lto 3'} seek to^{quash the proceedings against them in C C No 1313of 2018} pending on the^{hle of the MII Additional MetropolitanMagistrate'} Medchai^{Matkajgiri District at Athivelli'}

¶28

Learned counsel^{for the petitioner confinedhis prayer onlyto} the extent^{of dispensingwith the presence of the petitiont'rs before the} trial Court^{and specdy disposal of C'C'No' 1313 of 2O18'}

¶29

ln vier'v of^{the submissionmade by the learnedcounsel for the} petitioners, the^{appearance of the petitionersbefore the trial Court is} dispensed^{with unless their presence is specifically requiredduring} the course^{of trial, subject to the condition of petitionersbeing} represented by^{their counsel on every date of hearing' Since the} original C.C.^{pertainsto the year 2018, the trial Court is directed to} conclude the^{trial and dispose of the c.c. as expeditiousll' as possible'} preferably within^{a period of six (06) months from the date of receipt of} a copy of^{this order.}

¶30

4 . Accordingly,^{the Criminal Petition is disposed of'Pending} miscellaneous^{petitions,if any, in this CriminalPetition shallalso}

¶31

stand closed.

¶32

SD/.K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT flEGISTRAR //TRUE^COPY// ' -f'

¶33

¶34

SECTION^OFFICER

¶35

Medchal^{Matkaigiridistrict at}

¶36

To,

¶37

1 The^{Vlll Additional MetropolitanMagistrate'} Athivelli

¶38

ri^</sup>

¶39

,^:+ i.iq;,i:l"l,"bi''-'* -" - -:j." .,...- ..
2.TheVlMetropolitanMa 3.The StationHouse gistrate,Cyberabad at Medchal Malkajgiri District. Officer Du'td.igel ioliceStation Vberabad C 4.Two CCs tothe publicprosecutor Hyderabad[OUrl 5. One CC toSri K.Tejo Bharadwaj, Advocate [oPUC] 6.Two CD Coptes LSR/ptp High Courtforthe btateofTelanganaat
Ltl?

\ 'I

t t

HIGH COURT

DATED:0610812024

(

ORDER

CRLP.No.8869 of 2024

t o(\ 1HE Sfrl
((
3 14 ofi ?mt
a
t
.i l*^trrrc- P

¶52

DISPOSING OF THE GRL.P.

¶53

o{0"

Visanagiri Venkat Narayana Ravitej v. v. Hima Bindu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Visanagiri Venkat Narayana Ravitej v. v. Hima Bindu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Matta Srikanth Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Marri Padma Vs The State of Telangana

Matta Srikanth Vs The State of Telangana

Gokul Laxman Vs The State of Telangana

Abboju Nitin Vs The State of Telangana

Maisagalla Mallaiah Vs The State of Telangana