Allowed

Matta Srikanth v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC5 Aug 2024CRLP/4575/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This common order allowed CR.P.No.4575/2021 and I.A.No.1/2024 based on a compromise between the accused petitioner and the de-facto complainant. The criminal proceedings in Crime No.254 of 2021 were quashed, and costs were directed to be paid to the Director, Sainik Welfare, and the High Court Advocates Association.

What did the court decide?

Criminal proceedings in Crime No. 254 of 2021 are quashed; petitioner directed to pay Rs. 10,000 as costs.

Matta Srikanth Vs The State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[^338s ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

IVIONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY oF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶6

t.A.No.1 ol 2024

¶7

ln/and

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4575 OF 2021

¶9

Between:

¶10

Matta Srikanth, S/o Matlaiah, Aged 39 years, Occ ADE in TSSpDCL Rio H No B- 1-69, Boyawada, Nalgonda and also at H.No, 14-62t1F, Street No,B, Habsiguda, Hyderabad.

¶11

...Petitioner/accused

¶12

AND

¶13

1 The State of Telangana, through public prosecutor High Court at Hyderabad_

¶14

...Respondent No.1

¶15

.) Smt. Nakrekanti Shailaja, D/o Ramulu, aged 37 years Occ Govt. Medical officer (NHM), R/o Flat No. 102, Vidya Vihar Apartment, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District.

¶16

...Respondent No.2/De-facto Complainant

¶17

Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar peiition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in crime No. 254 of 2oz1 ot e.s. t.tatgonaa ttTown, Nalgonda District.

¶18

l.A. NO: 1OF 2024

¶19

BETWEEN:

¶20

Smt. Nakrekanti Shailaja, D/o Ramulu, aged 37 years Occ Govt. Medical otticer (NHM), R/o Flat No. 102, Vidya Vihar Apa'rtment. Natgonda, waigonOa District.

¶21

Petitioner/Respondent No.2/De-facto Complainant

¶22

AND

¶23

1 Matta Srikanth, S/o Mallaiah, Aged 39 Years, Occ ADE in TSSpDCL R/o f-f fo.^{e-l-0.Q,Boyawada, Natgondaand atso at H..No.1-4-62t1F,Street No.A,} Habsrguda, Hyderabad.

¶24

... RespondenUpetitioner/Accused

¶25

The State of Telangana, through Public prosecutor High Court at Hyderabad.

¶26

¶27

...ResPondent^No'1

¶28

PetitionunderSection320(2)ofCrPCprayingthatinlhe.circumstances stated in^{the Memorandr*} "i^{c?"i,7a. of criminalpetition,the lligh court may be} pleased to record^{tne compr"om-iseand consequently quashthe entire proceedings} asainst^{the Petitioner/ ;5cis;i;} r'io zs+ ot^{2021on the file of P'S} Nalgonda^{ll Town.} ';;;

¶29

l.A. NO:3 oF²⁰²¹

¶30

BETWEEN:

¶31

The State of^{Telangana, through Public prosecutorHighCourt at Hyderabad'}

¶32

...Petitioner/ResPondent

¶33

AND

¶34

Matta Srikanth^{Sio Mallarah,Aged 39 Years'.occ ADE in TSSPDCLR/o} H No 8-1-6e^{uovr*Jiili'i'l's;;"'il';;} 'tio^{ai n ruo 14'62t1F ' streetNo B'} Habsiguda.^HYderabad

¶35

. .. ResPondenUAccused

¶36

Smt. Nakrekantr^{SharlaiaD/o Ramulu' aged 37 years Occ Govt ltiledical} officer^{(NHtr4r. nro rra?'fto"i"oi vibvr'viniinpdrtment, Nalgonda. Nalgonda} District.

¶37

( R -2 is not necessary Party)

¶38

...ResPondenUComPlainant

¶39

Petition under^{Section 482 of Cr.P C praying that in the circumstances} stated in the^{l\ilemorandrr'LiOl.*nO,of Criminal-Peiition, the HighCourt ,-r.y..b"} i. vacate^{the stay giantedin CrlPNo4575 of 2021 on the file of High} il;;; Cour|dtd.2116l2C21

¶40

l.A. NO :2OF^2O21

¶41

Petition under-^{Section482 of Cr.P C praying that in the circumstances} stated in the^{tvlemorandum tf Groundsof criminal petition,the High court maybe} pilr*J ," Strnt^{stay ol all iurther proceedings including arrest of the petitionerin} brime uo^'254 of^{2021 of p.S. Natgonda 1-Town, Nalgonda Districtpending} Jisposal of the^{Criminalpetition in the interest of justice.}

¶42

This Petition^{comlng on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandumof} Grounds of criminai^{Petition and upon hearingthe arguments ofsri} E Sreenivasa^{Rao, Advocaie for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf} of the Respondent^{No 1 and of sri lvl Tarak Abhilash. Advocatefor the Respondent} No.2.

¶43

The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶48

I.A.No.l ol 2024 IN /AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.4575 of 2O2l

¶49

COMMON ORDER:

¶50

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for^the petitioner as well as respondent No.2, that during^pendencyof thc present Criminal Petition, thc parties have compromised^thc mzrtter and accordingly, I.A.No.l of 2024 has been lllcd^tcr ru:c<.rrcl the compromise betwecn theur and to compo.tnd^thc o lfe nccs.

¶51

2 Vide order dated 18.07 .2024, this Court <lircctcd thc purties zrlong u,ith their respective counsel to appear bcforc^Ltrc Sccrctary, I{igh Court kgal Sen,ices C'ommittee, High^{Court for} rlrc Statc o[ Telarrgana, Hyclcrabad, ior iclen^{t ificz.t} ion ancl^tt> sr.rbmit a re port.

¶52

3- Pursuant to the above saicl direction issucd^b-v this^Court, tlre parties have appealed and the Sect'etar-7, High Cor-lrt^LcgaI Scrvices Committee, has identificd the parties and subinitted^tL rcport, dated 26.07.2024 and the same is^plzrced on record.

¶53

In view of the above, I.A.No.l of 2024 is allou'erl. Consequentll,, this Crirninal Perition is zrllowed and^Lhe proceedings in Crime No.254 of 2O21 of Nalgonda I[ Torvn Policc St.ation, Nzrlgonda District, against the^pctitittner, .rre'^hcrcbv

¶54

) SKS.,] (l P :io^.l57: ot 2{)21

¶55

quashcd sLrbjcc( (o the petitioncr pa5,ipg cosls of Rs.S,O0O/ (Rupees Five^'l'housand ()nly) to the Dircctor, Sainrk Welfare, Hyderabacl (Savings A/c.No.52 188926279, Starc Bank of India, Shantinagar BranclL (2OO7O, IFSC Code:SBINOO2O07O, MICR No.500004057) ancl Rs.5,OO0/ (Rupees Fivc Thousand Only) to the Telangana IIiglr Court Arlvocales Association, Flyderabad, within a period ol tu o (02) r.tcr:l<s frorn tocliiy and file proof ol the same before tl'rt. Re g!stry.

¶56

Miscellarrcous; applications, iI ar-r-v pc'ndir-rg, shall stand

¶57

closed.

¶58

Sd/. P. PADMANABHA^REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

( i/TRUE COPY// ',/

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Special^{Judicral Frrst Class h/agrstrate(for Prohibitionand Excise} Offences) at^Nalgonda

¶63

The Station^{HouseOfficer. Nalgonda ll Town Police Station' Nalgonda}

¶64

f*o CCs to^{the publrc proseculor, HrghCourt for the State of Telangana at} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶65

a. One CC to^{Srr E Sreenivasa Rao' Advocate[OPUC]}

¶66

One CC to Sri^{M Tarak Abhilash, Advocate [CPUC]}

¶67

Two CD CoPies

¶68

ADI(gh

¶69

Along with^{a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise}

¶70

Note: Total Amount^{of Rs. 10,000/ ( RupeesTen thousand only ) has been paid by} sri E sreenivasa^{Rao. Counselfor the Petitioneras directed by the Hon'blecourt} vide order dated^{05 08 2024 as Rs. 5,0001 ( RupeesFrve thousandonly ) to the} ,,Director, Sainik welfare Hyderabad and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana^{High courl Acvocates Association, Hyderabadand filed Memoas} proof of compliance USR^{No 1C9402of 2024 and dated 11-11-2024'} Y.

HIGH COURT

DATED:05108t2024

COMMON ORDER

l.A.No.l of 2024 ln/and

¶75

1 .4E S TA,
e c c
(
tr'<br>c
J
t) 1 s 0E[ 2024 C,
4+
t
D3
T ;o

¶76

CRLP.No.457S of 2021

¶77

ALLOWING THE CRLP AND IA.NO.1 OF 2024

¶78

q-C*b k', \ -I__ ;*1'r*1

¶79

I I I I n

¶80

li il li ll l: I' I ii

¶81

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE QF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶82

Cd. P No. 4575 Of 2021

¶83

Between

¶84

tr4atta Srikanth, S/o. Mallaiah, aged 42 years, Occ. Govt. Employee, R/o. H. No.8-1-69, Boyawada, Nalgonda District.

¶85

.. Petitioner/ Accused

¶86

And

¶87

1 State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad

¶88

Respondent No 1

¶89

Nakerekanti Shailaja D/o Ramutu, aged 40 years. Occ: Doctor,

¶90

R/0. Vidyavihar Apartments. Vrdyanagar N3lgonda District.

¶91

Respondent No.2/ Defacto Complarnant

¶92

JOINT MEMO FILED BY BOTH PARTIES

¶93

We, both the parttes compromised the mafler amicably as per advice of the elders and we decided to file quash petition before thrs Hon b,e Court and the 2"d RespondenUdefacto Complainant has no oblectton to quash the enttre proceedings against the Petihoner/ Accused in Crime No. 254 of 2021 on the file of p.S Nalgonda ll To$in. We both signed in this memo with our free will and consent and there is no any coercion or force against us. Hence this memo is ttled

¶94

' Pelitroner

¶95

Couns"S/, etitioner

¶96

2nd respondent Couns e or 2no respondent

Matta Srikanth v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Matta Srikanth v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Afreen Begum Vs The State of Telangana

Medisetty Narayana Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Chatrathi Madhuri Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Marri Padma Vs The State of Telangana

Matta Srikanth Vs The State of Telangana

Banoth Shiva Ganga Priya Himalai Vs The State of T.S.