Dismissed

B. Amarendra v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC4 Jul 2024CRLP/8602/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal petition sought quashing of pending complaint proceedings before the III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. The Public Prosecutor submitted the charge sheet had been laid, rendering the petition infructuous. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous with liberty to file a fresh petition if the cause survives.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to move a fresh quashing petition if cause survives; miscellaneous petitions closed.

B. Amarendra Vs State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[^338s ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE^{K. SUJANA}

¶6

CRIMINAL P ETITION NO:^{8602 OF 2022}

¶7

Between:

¶8

B. Amarendra, S/o B. Laxmaiah,^{agedabout55 years, Occ:froprietorof Dreams} Communications, Ryo H.No.17, Sahas^{Circle, Raja Street, TNagar, Chennai-600} o17.

¶9

,..PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 State of Telangana, rep. through^{Public Prosecutor. High Court,Hyderabad,} Telangana 500 066.

¶12

2 U. Shiva Kumar @ U. Shiva Kumar^{Goud, Slq U, qqlq Kistaiah, aged.about} at vears. Occ: B-usiness, No^{2-2-11441121N314, Vidyanagar, Ramalayam} Teniple. New Nallakunta,^Hyderabad

¶13

...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT

¶14

Petition under Section 482^{of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Groundsof criminalPetition, the Highcourtmay} be pleased to^quash the^{proceedingsagainst the petitionerin C.C. No 218 of} 2014 on the file of lll Additional Chief^{Metropolitan Magistrateat Hyderabad'}

¶15

l.A. NO: 2OF 2022

¶16

Petition under Section^{482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances} stated in the lvlemorandum of^{Groundsof crimtnalPetition, the Highcourtmay} be pleased to stay all further^{proceedings againstthe petitioner in c.c.No.218 of} 2014 on the file of lll Additional^{Chief Metropolitanl/agistrateat Hyderabad'}

¶17

l.A. NO: 1OF 2023

¶18

Petition under Section^{482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Grounds of criminalPetition, the High courtmay} be pleased to amend the^{C.C.No.218 of 2014 as C.C.No.4364of 2022 in} Crl.P.No.8602 of 2022 in the^{interestof justice.}

¶19

¶20

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K SAI KRISHNA MOHAN RAO, Advocate for the Petitioner and the public prosecutor for the State of Telangana on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.8 6o2 of 2022

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

The present Criminal^petition is filed seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioner in C.C.No.218 of 2024 on the file of the learned III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad.

¶25

Learned Assistalt Public Prosecutor, on u,ritten instructions, submitted thar charge sheet is laid and therefore, the Crimina_l Petition has become infructuous.

¶26

Recording the said submission, the Criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous granting liberty ro the petitioner to move a fresh petition in case the cause survlves.

¶27

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if aly, shali stand closed. ANABHA

¶28

ANABHA^REDDY SdT^{P PAD} ANT^REGISTRAR //TRUE^COPY// SECTION^OFFICER

¶29

¶30

iilit$$ilfiTi:Htr#,t:ifiiffit'di''fir$#ffi:ls*+:nsanaa'l S'.t""SttS^toY]I.o'KRI.HNA M.HAN RAo' Advocate [.PUC] ^ 5. Two^{CD CoPies}

v,< pr

HIGH COURT DATED: 0410712024

¶35

ORDER

¶36

GRLP.No.8602 of 2022

¶37

yC illl.; r,--S: $
1i
4f lfi-s! 202t o),
J.
cr.';;;.
iu

¶38

DISMISSING THE CRL.PETITION

¶39

AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶40

S."d'L Vk il(('.

B. Amarendra v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B. Amarendra v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vislavath Mahender @ Mehu Naik Vs The State of Telangana

Kampati Lalitha Vs The State of Telangana

Gattu Kanakavva Vs The State of Telangana

Dande Yugander Vs The state of Telangana

Bheenaveni Ram Shepherd , Bheenaveni Ramaiah Vs The State of Telangana and another

Dwaraka Prasad Jhawer Vs The State of Telangana