Dismissed

Dande Yugander v. The state of Telangana

Telangana HC4 Jul 2024CRLP/7830/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed a petition filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of criminal proceedings. The Court held that the petition became infructuous as a charge sheet had already been laid. Other related petitions were closed with liberty to move a fresh petition if the cause survives.

What did the court decide?

Criminal petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to move a fresh petition if the cause survives.

Dande Yugander Vs The state of Telangana — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³³⁸⁵ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITI ONNO: 7830 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

Dande Yugander, S/o. DandeMadhusudhan, Aged about 53 year, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 6-3-3471,181601, Flat No. 601, Sunries Apartments, Dwarkapuri Colony, Panjagutta, Khairatabad, Somajiguda, Hyderabad

¶9

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶10

AND

¶11

1 Ili:tl9 "f Telangana, Represented by its public prosecutor Functioning Irom Honourable High Court Building

¶12

2 M. Balakrishna, S/o. IV. Yugender, Aged 52 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Villa No.^'101, lndu Fortune Fietdi, KPHB bofony,'Uya.irabiO

¶13

...RESPONDENT No.1 & 2.

¶14

Petition 'under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to Quash the FIR in cr No. '1360 of 20i7 registered with ps KpHB colony cyberabad commissionerate issued for offence punishable under head of 420,384,406, 120 ( B) of tpC.

¶15

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2022

¶16

Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be pleased to permit petitioner/complainant to enter in to compromise in FIR in Crime No 1360 of 2017, registered with pS KPHB Colony, Cyberabad commissionerate issued for offence punishabre under head of 420,3g4,406, 120 (B) of IPC

¶17

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2022

¶18

Between:

¶19

Ivl. Balakrishna, S/o.^{M. Yugender,Aged 52 years,Oc:c:Bur;iness,R/o Villa} No.^'101 , lndu Fortune^{Fields, KPHB Colony, Hyderabad}

¶20

...PETITIONER/Rl:SPONDENT^No.2

¶21

The state of Telangana,^{Representedby its PublicPrrlseculorFunctioning} from Honourable High Court^Building

¶22

...PETlTlON ER/RI]SPONDENT^No.1

¶23

AND

¶24

Dande Yugander, S/o.^{DandeMadhusudhan,Aged about 53 Year, Occ:} Business,^-R/o. H.No.^{6'3'3471181601,Flat No. 60'l} ,^{Sunries Apartments,} Dwarkapuri Colony, Panjagutta,^{Khairatabad, Somajigudia,Hyclerabad}

¶25

,..FIESPONDENT No.'t &^2.

¶26

Petition under Sectron 320^{(6) of cr.P_cpraying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Grounds of criminal Petiti,:n,the High court may} be pleased to record compromise^{FIR in crime No. 1360 of 2A17 registered with} PS KPHB Colony Cyberabad commissionerate^{in betwe=nPe:titioner / Accused} No. 5 and respondent No.² /^{complainant issued for offence punishableunder} head of 420,384, 406,^{120 ( B) of lPC.}

¶27

This Petition coming on for^{hearing, upon perusirtgthe: Memorandumof} Grounds of criminal Petition and^{upon hearing the arguntents of Sri M RATHAN} slNGH, Advocate for the^{Petitionerand the Assistant Pr:blic Prosecutor for the} state of Telangana on behalf^{of the Respondent No.1 and of siri DHARAMVEER} SINGH, Advocate for the^{RespondentNo.2.}

¶28

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶29

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SU..IANA CRJMINAL PETITION No.783O of 2022

¶30

ORDER:

¶31

The present Criminal petition is filed seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioner in Crime No.l360 of 2OlT of KpHB Colonv Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate.

¶32

Learned Assistant public prosecutor, on written instructions, submitted that charge sheet is laid arrd therefore, the Criminal petrtion has become infructuous.

¶33

J Recording the said submission, the Criminal petition is dismissed AS infructuous granting liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh petition in case the cause survlves

¶34

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if aly, shall stand closed.

¶35

Sd/- V. KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// c,/ v

¶36

SECTION OFFICER

¶37

¶38

'1 . The ll Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-XlX Metropolitan Magistrate Kukatpally at Miyapur.

¶39

The Siation Houie^{Officer, KPHB Colony Police Station Cyberabad} Comm issionerate.

¶40

Two CCs to the^{Public Prosecutor, High Courtfor the State of Telanganaat} Hyderabad^(OUT)

¶41

Ohe CC to SRl. M RATHAN^{SINGH,Advocate} IOPUC]

¶42

5 One CC to SRl. DHARAMVEER^{SINGH,Advocate} [OPUC]

¶43

Two CD Copies

¶44

U{L PR

¶45

HIGH COURT DATED:0^410712024

¶46

<br>

¶47

ORDER

¶48

CRLP.No.7830^{of 2022}

¶49

ti. {H E E-ra*
<br>l:'
G(
I
,.) 14 0Ef i&lr
oz
\ +
t
a€oa4S ciN4it
-=---

¶50

DISMISSING^{THE CRL.PETITION}

¶51

AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶52

S-

Dande Yugander v. The state of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dande Yugander v. The state of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vislavath Mahender @ Mehu Naik Vs The State of Telangana

Kampati Lalitha Vs The State of Telangana

Gattu Kanakavva Vs The State of Telangana

B. Amarendra Vs State of Telangana

Bheenaveni Ram Shepherd , Bheenaveni Ramaiah Vs The State of Telangana and another

Dwaraka Prasad Jhawer Vs The State of Telangana