Dismissed
Sri. Srichurnam Arun Kumar v. The State of Telagana
Telangana HCCRLP/7660/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
No substantive issue was decided.
What the court decided
AI extract
No substantive issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132571
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTYSEVENTH DAY OF NOVEI\4BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENWFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT.JUSTICEJUWADISRIDEVI
CRIMINAL PETITIO N NO: 7660OF 2024
Between:
Sri Srichurnam Arun Kumar, S/o.Laxmi Narayana,Age 39 years,Occ. Private Services, R/o. H.No.8-43t418,West BalajiHills, Uppal, Rangareddy district Telangana State- 500039.
...Petitioners/Accused
AND
...ResPondenUComPlainant
...Respondent No.2/DefactoComplainant
Petition under Section482 of Cr.P.C prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay be pleased toquash the proceedings in the crime No. 632 of 2023dated 23.06.2023 registeredundersection lJlsec. 417, 420, 406'493 lPC, 3(1)(0(s), 3(2) (va) SC, ST POAACT, beforethe PoliceStation Medipally, pendingon the file of the lV AMM court,LB Nagar against petitioner/accused.
l.A. NO: 2OF 2024
Petition under Section482 ofCr.P.C prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to stay allfurtherproceedingsin Crime No. 632 of 2023 on 23.d6.2023 before thepotrceStation Medipally, Medchal-Malkajgiri district against thepetitionerfor lhe offences under Section417, 42O, 406' 493 lPC, Sif XOtst, 3(2)(va) SC, STPOA ACT pendingdisposal of the Criminal Petition in the interest of lustice.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K. Muralidhar, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
THE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICEJUVVADISRIDEVI
CRIMINALPETITIONNo.7660OF 2024
ORDER:
In view of theletter dated23.1 1.2024seeking permissionto
withdraw the CriminalPetition, the CriminalPetition is dismissed
as withdrawn.
Pending miscellaneousapptications, ifany, shallstand
closed.
Sd/- T. JAYASREE ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
TION OFFICER
To,
Njb/ch
ya-
HIGH COURT
DATED:2711112024
ORDER
CRLP.No.7660 ot 2024
'( H E S TAre
(
q
J
Ct) 0 6 F:-1 2il25 -bo
t
OF .S r'. { (:.
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS WITHDRAWN
g.T8"r) &{"
Sri Srichurnam Arun Kumar
The State of Telangana
Justice Juwadi Sri Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court