Disposed

Ravi Banoth v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC9 Jul 2024CRLP/7407/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court held that the petition's averments did not constitute offences under Section 386 IPC. Instead of quashing, it directed the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer following Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and specific Supreme Court guidelines.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to appear before Investigating Officer on 19.07.2024; proceedings to follow Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and Antesh Kumar guidelines.

Ravi Banoth Vs The State of Telangana — Bail and Remand | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[^338s ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY^{OF JULY} TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY FOUR}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE^{K. SUJANA}

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:74O7^{OF 2024}

¶7

Between

¶8

Ravi Banoth, S/o. Banoth^{Mansing, agedabout 36 years, Occ. Ex Army,} $/9 8-23, Sudhavagu Thanda,^{Mujahidpuram, ThirumalayapalemMandal'} Khammam Diskict.

¶9

Petitioner/Accused

¶10

AND

¶11

1- The State of Telangana, Rep^by the^{Public Prosecutor, High Court of} Hyderabad.^(Through SHO,^Maripeda)

¶12

... Respondent

¶13

Raju Banoth, S/o.^Bad va. aoed about 60 vears,^{Occ. Agriculture R/o.DSR} Redya Thanda, H/o. DSR Llndat Thanda, Maripeda^{Mandal, Mahabubabad} Diskict

¶14

...RespondenUDe-facto Complainant

¶15

Petition under Section 528 of^{Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha,2023} praying that in the circumstances stated^{in the Memorandum of Groundsof} bririrlnit Petition, the High Court^{maybe pteased to quashthe F.l R' No 172 of} 2024 on the file of the P.S.,^{Maripedain the interest of justice.}

¶16

l.A. NO: 1OF 2024

¶17

Petition under Section^{528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha,2023} praying that in the circumstances stated^{in the Memorandum of Grounds of} briririnit^petition, the^{High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedingsin} FlR. No. 172 of 2024 on the^{file of the P.S. Maripedapending disposal of the main} quash petition in the interest of^justice.

¶18

This Petition coming on for hearing,^{upon perusingthe Memorandum of} Grounds of criminal Petition^{and upon hearingthe arguments of Sri AshokReddy} Kanathala, Advocate for the^{Petitioner,Sri Arun Kumar Doddla, AdditionalPublic} Prosecutor on behalf of the^{RespondentNo.1 and noneappeared for the} Respondent No.2.

¶19

The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶20

t \

¶21

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE^{K. SUJANA}

¶22

cRIMINAL PETITION No.74O7^oI2024

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

This Criminal Petition is hled by the^{petitionerT/accused,} seeking to quash^{the proceedings against him in Crime No.l72 of} 2024 on the file of Maripeda^{Police Station,lvlahabubabad,} registered for the alleged^{offencespunishableund,:rSection 386} of the Indian Penal^{Code (for short'IPC).}

¶25

Heard Sri Ashok Reddy Kanathala,^{learned counsel for} the petitioner and Sri Arun Kumar^{Doddla, learned Additional} Public Prosecutor for respondent^No.1 -^State.

¶26

3 As seen from the record, the^{averments of the petitiondo} not constitute offences under^{Section386 of IPC. Hence, this} Court deems it appropriate to^{direct the petitior:Lers to appear} before the Investigating Oflicer on^{or before 19.07 2024 between} 11:OO a.m. and O5:00 p.m. and^{in turn, the Invesl-igatingOfficer} is directed to follow the^{procedurelaid down under Section 41-A} Cr.P.C. and also the guidelines^{formulatedb}' the Hon'ble} Supreme Court of India in Antesh Kumar a. Stdte of^Bihart scrupulously. Hou,ever, the^petitioner shall co-operate^{with the}

'^{(zora) s scc zz:}

'.\

Investigating Officer as and when required by furnishing information and the petitioner shall submit his defense and produce all relevant documents/material required for the purpose of the investigation and the.Investigating officer shal consider the same before filing appropriate report before the learned Magistrate concerned.

¶31

4 Accordingly, the Criminal petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also

¶32

stand closed.

¶33

SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL, ASSISTANT REGIS

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1 . The Judicial First Class Magistrate at Thorrur

¶38

The Station House Officer, Maripeda Police Station, Mahabubabad

¶39

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶40

One CC to Sri Ashok Reddy Kanathala, Advocate [OPUC]

¶41

Two CD Copies

ADK

HIGH COURT

DATED:0910712024

ORDER

CRLP.No.74O7 of 2024

:_r_
1 H ) ri frl{
fr
'),
lL)c\ 1 5 JtJl. 202t

¶49

DISPOSING OF THE CRLP

¶50

2Y
b

Ravi Banoth v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Banoth v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Syed Furkhan Ali Vs The State of Telangana

Nagavelli Prem Kumar, Vs The State of Telangana

Gowtham Kampa Vs The State of Telangana

Gundarapu Sneha Latha Vs State of Telangana

India Karthik Vs The State of Telangana

Bidyuth Bala, Vs The State of Telangana