Disposed

Nagavelli Prem Kumar, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC8 Jul 2024CRLP/7322/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a petition under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings. The Court held that averments did not constitute offences under Sections 409 and 467 IPC, directed the petitioner to cooperate with the IO under Section 41-A CrPC and Arnesh Kumar guidelines, and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with direction to cooperate with investigation; proceedings for Sections 409 and 467 IPC held not constituted.

Nagavelli Prem Kumar, Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³³⁸⁵ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:7322OF 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

Nagavelli Prem Kumar, S/o.Komuraiah, Aged about 40 years, Occ. pvt. Employee R/o.H.No.1-g-1057, postal Colony Subedaii, HrnartonOr, Warangal District.

¶9

AND

¶10

... Petitioner/Accused

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Rep by its public prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

¶12

2 Mohammed lrshaad Hussain, S/o lqbal Hussain, aged about 3g years Occ . Business, R/o. H. No. 1 0- 1 - 1 2/7, SRT_96 Seriting jmfiJily: k;;;Ail; R;^s; Reddy Diskict.

¶13

...RespondenUDe-facto Complainant

¶14

Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal'pelition, the uigt cou;;iy ue pfeased to quash the proceedings in the F.r.R.No.'r7 of 2024, dt.zr.os.2024 on the Iil-"^^of ^E_OW-^{Cyb(Cyberabad)poticeStation,Cyberabad,for the offences} U/Sec.406, 420,409,467,468, 471 lpc, against the iretitioner/A6.

¶15

l.A. NO: 2OF 2024

¶16

Petition under section 482 of cr.p .c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal'peiition, the High court may oe pleased to.grant stay of all further proceedings including arrest of ihe p.iition"ino in connection with the F.l.R.No. l7 ot 2024, dt-22.0s2024 on the iile of Eow cyb(cyberabad) Police station, cyberabad, pending disposal of the above criminal petition.

¶17

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Mernorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri Meghana Addla suneel, Advocate for the petitioner, sri D Arun Kumar, Assistant public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.'l and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

THE HONOURABLE^{SMT.JUSTICE K. S{.'JANA}

¶20

CRIMINAL PETITION^{No.7322 of 2024}

¶21

oRD^ER:

¶22

This Criminal^{Petition is filed under Sectr on 482 of the} CodeofCriminalProcedure,lg73(forshort'C:-PC')bythe petitionet f^{accused No'6, seeking toquash th': proceedings} against^{himinCrime No.17 of 2024 oo the lile of EOW} Cyberabad^{PoliceStation,Cyberabad, registered ,ior the alleged} offences^{punishableunder Sections 406, 42O' 4O9 467 ' 468 and} 471^{of the Indian Penal Code (for short'IPC')'}

¶23

Heard Sri^{Meghana Addla Suneel,learned counsel for} the^{petitionerand Sri D'Arun Kumar,learnedAssistantPublic} Prosecutor^{for respondentNo'1 - State'}

¶24

As seen^{from the record, the averments of the petitiondo} 3. not^{constituteoffences underSections409 anrl 46'.7 0f lPC.} Hence,thisCourtdeemsitappropriatetodirecttlrepetitionerto appear^{beforethe Investigating Officeron or beforeIB'O7 '2024} between^{11:00 a.m. and 05:00 p'm'and in turn'the} Investigating^{officer is directed to follow the proce,lure laid down} under^{Section 4l-A Cr.P.C. and also the guidelines formulated} by the^{Hon'bleSupremeCourt of India in ArneshKumaru'}

¶25

¶26

¶27

State of Bihafl scrupulously. However, the petitioner shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer as arld when required by furnishing information and the petitioner shall submit his defense and produce all relevant documents/ material required for the purpose of the investigation and the Investigating Officer shall consider the same before filing appropriate report before the learned^.Magistrate concerned.

¶28

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.

¶29

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also

¶30

stand closed.

¶31

SD/- V HARI PRASAD, ASSISTANT REGIS^T

¶32

//TRUE COPY//

¶33

SECTION OFFICER

¶34

To, 1. The Principal^{Junior Civil Judge-cum-MetropolitanMagistrate'Ranga Reddy} District , L.B.Nagar,^HYderabad.

¶35

z. ine Staiion^{HoLLeOfficer, EOW Cyb(Cyberabad) Police Station' Cyberabad} 5 r*" ccs^{to the public prosecutor,High court for the state of relangana at} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶36

a. Oie CC to^{Sri MeghanaAddla Suneel, Advocate [OPUC]}

¶37

Two CD CoPies

ADK

'^{(zora) a scc zz:}

HIGH COURT

DATED:08t07t2024

ORDER

1 flE ST41 €
c:)) 12 JUr ztil z
,a'
.o
t oEspqtcHI

¶46

CRLP.No.7322 of 2024

¶47

DISPOSING OF THE CRLP

¶48

J
(qLq
<br>

Nagavelli Prem Kumar, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nagavelli Prem Kumar, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kallem Kethamma Vs State of Telangana

Kommuri Rajashekar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Pattabhi Ramaiah Dandamudi Vs The State of Telangana

Pullakanti Anitha Vs The State of Telangana

Syed Furkhan Ali Vs The State of Telangana

Gowtham Kampa Vs The State of Telangana