Allowed

Mr.Pusala Charan Teja v. Smt. Munigadapa Sandhya Rani

Telangana HC10 Jul 2024CRLP/6903/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana allowed common Criminal Petitions filed to quash proceedings in a subordinate court. The court noted a compromise between parties, verified compliance via the Legal Services Committee, and directed payment of court fees before granting the quashing order.

What did the court decide?

The proceedings in SC.SPL No.81/2021 pending before VI Addl. Metropolitan Session Judge are quashed upon payment of Rs.10,000/- (public deposits) as directed.

Mr.Pusala Charan Teja Vs Smt. Munigadapa Sandhya Rani — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³³⁸⁵¹

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶6

r.A. NOS. 2 AND 3 0F 2024

¶7

IN /AND

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6903 OF 2024

¶9

Between:

¶10

Mr. Pusala Charan Teja, S/o P Brahmam, Age 27years, Occ. Unemployed, Rio. H.No. 8-3-22816781714. Karmika nagar, Yousufguda. Hyderabad, Telangana - 500045

¶11

. ..Petitioner / Accused No. 1

¶12

Mr. Pusala Brahmam, S/o. Rama Swamy, Age S0years, Occ. Carpenter

¶13

...Accused No. 2

¶14

Smt. Pusala Sandhya Rani, Wo P. Brahmam, Age 4Oyears, Occ. House wife

¶15

...Accused No. 3

¶16

Miss. Pusala Veneela, D/o P. Brahmam, Age 24 years, Occ. Unemployed

¶17

...Accused No. 4

¶18

IAll^{the aboveare residing at R/o H.No.21-2-11413,Markendeya Colony,} Godavarikhani, Ramagunda Mandal, Peddapalli, Telangana - 505209 l

¶19

¶20

Smt. Munigadapa Sandhya Rani, Wo. Pusala Charan Teja, Age 25 yrs. Occ. Constable, R/o. H.No. 8-3-22816781714, Karmika Nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500045

¶21

...Respondent No. 1 / Defacto Complainant

¶22

The State of Telangana, through Public Prosecutor, Hon'ble High Court of Telangana

¶23

...Respondent No. 2

¶24

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioners No.'1 , 2, 3 & 4 in SC.SPL No.81/2021 which is pending before Hon'ble Vl Addl. Metropolitan Session Judge, Hyderabad Dist- Telangana, in the interest of^justice.

¶25

¶26

" l.A. NOl.2OF 2O24

¶27

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.^{prayingthat in the circumstances} stated in the ttilemorandum of Grounds^{of Criminal Petition, the HighCourtmay} be pleased that the Petitioners^{humblysubmit that the main criminalPetition has} been filed seeking^quashing of the^{proceedings againstthe Petitioners/ Accuses} No. 1to 4 in SC.SPL No.B1/2021,^{which is pending before Hon'ble Vl Addl.} Metropolitan Session Judge, Hyderabad^{Dist. Telangana, arisingfrom Crime} No.273 of 2021 registered by^{P.S. Jubilee Hills for the alleged offencesU/Sec.} 498-4, 506 l.P.C. and Sec. 4 of D.P^{Act andSec 3(1)(0(s) of SCs and STs(PA)} Amendment Act, 2015, in view of the Compromise^{accorded betweenthe} Petitioner and Respondent No. 1. The Petitioner^{humbly prays for the indulgence} of this Hon'ble Court U/S. 482 of Cr.P.C.^{to permit the Petitioner to compromise} the matter, in the interest of .iustice.

¶28

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2024

¶29

Between:

¶30

Smt. Munigadapa Sandhya Rani, Wo.^{Pusala Charan Teja, Age2_7 yrs. Occ.} Unemployed, R/o H.No. 8-3-22816781714,^{Karmika Nagar, Yousufguda,} Hyderabad, Telangana - 500045

¶31

...Petitioner / Accused No.¹

¶32

ANO

¶33

1 Ir. Pusala Charan Teja, S/o P Brahmam, Age 27years, Occ. Unemployed, R/o. H.No. 8-3-2281678/714. Karmika nagar, Yousufguda. Hyderabad, Telangana - 500045

¶34

...Petitioner / Accused No.¹

¶35

Mr. Pusala Brahmam, S/o. Rama Swamy,^{Age S0years, Occ. Carpenter}

¶36

...Accused No. 2

¶37

Smt. Pusala Sandhya Rani,^{Wio P. Brahmam, Age 4Oyears,Occ. House wife} ...Accused No. 3

¶38

Miss. Pusala Veneela, D/o P. Brahmam,^{Age 24 years,Occ. Unemployed}

¶39

...Accused No. 4

¶40

I^{All the aboveare residing at R/o H.No.21-2-11413,Marke_nde^y-a Colony,} Godavarikhani, Ramagunda Mandal, Peddapalli, Telangana -⁵⁰⁵²⁰⁹ l

¶41

The State of Telangana, through Public Prosecutor,^{Hon'ble High Courtof} Telangana

¶42

...Respondent No. 2

¶43

Petition under Section 320 (2) rlw 482 of Cr.P.C.^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal^Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise accorded between the Petitioner and Respondents herein and quash the^proceedings against the Petitioners/Accuses No. 1 to 4 in SC.SPL No.8112021 , which is^pending before Vl Addl. Metropolitan Session Judge, Hyderabad Dist. Telangana.

¶44

l.A. NO: 4OF 2024

¶45

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court^may be pleased to extend the order daled 1010712024^passed in CrlP^No.6903of 2024 in the interest of^justice.

¶46

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Shashikanth B, Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri Arpula lshwarya, Advocate on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and the Additional Public Prosecutor^for the^Respondent No. 2.

¶47

The Court made the following Common Order :

I i

I t

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶52

LA.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O24 inland CRIMINAL PETITI N No.69O3 of 2o i!.4

¶53

COMMON ORDER:

¶54

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the respondent No.1, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

¶55

Vide order dated 28.06.2024, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

¶56

Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 08.07.2024 and the same is placed on record.

¶57

In view of the above, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in SC.SPL No.B1 of 2027 on the file of the

¶58

Ii I

¶59

learned VI Additional Metropolitan Session Judge at Secunderabad, Hyderabad City against the petitioners/ accused Nos.1 to 4 are hereby quashed subject to the petitioner paying an amount of Rs.5,000/_ (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.No.52188926279, State Bank of India, Shantinagar Branch (20070), IFSC Code:S8IN0020070, MICR No.500004057) and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry.

¶60

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

¶61

Sd/- A.V.S. PRASAD ASSISTANT REGIS RAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Vl Additional Metropolitan Session Judge at Secunderabad at Hyderabad City

¶67

The Station House Officer, Jubilee Hills PS, Hyderabad City District

¶68

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court forthe State of Telangana, Hyderabad [OUT]

¶69

One CC to Sri Shashikanth B, Advocate [OPUC]

¶70

One CC to Sri Arpula lshwarya, Advocate [OPUC]

¶71

Two CD Copies

Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise

¶76

Note: Total Amount of Rs, 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand onry ) has been paid by Sri shashikanth B, counsel for the petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble court vide order dated 10-07 -2024 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand onry ) to the Director, sainik welfare, Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. '108528 ol 2024 dated 07-11_2024.

Vtugh

HIGH GOURT

DATED:10 10712024

COMMON ORDER

-{ I
e
((.
co 1 4 l,/!U 2024 aj,z
a
* t)E..jpATci-\ cO t

¶86

l.A. Nos. 2 and 3 of²⁰²⁴

¶87

in / and

¶88

CRLP.No.6903 of^2O24

¶89

ALLOWING THE CRLP^AND

¶90

l.A. Nos. 2 and 3 of²⁰²⁴ C^:PP^t "K"

¶91

-.j--.-.=..ry
,x
.4.
e

¶92

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH C.OURT FOR TTIE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

LA. No. ot2O24

CRL. pNo.^IN

of2o24

BETWEEN:

Smt.-A4unigadapa Sandhya Rani, W/o-Pusala Charan Teja j R/o H-No.8_ 3_228 / 6z d i z t 4, Aarmtka nagar, yousufguda, Hyderabad, Tetalgana _ 5000+.5.

¶98

t |r1.[+s1Lra Charan Teja, S/o P. Brahmam.

¶99

AND

¶100

PETITIoNER /ESpOrVDENT. No. 1

¶101

Age; 271rears, Occ: Unemployed, R/o H.Np.s 3_228 / 6Z8 / i i: Karmika' nagar, yousufgud a, Hyderabad, Telangana _ 500045.

¶102

Mr. lriaia Brahmam, S/o Ram4- Swamv.

¶103

,,.PETITIoNER/ACCUSED No. 1

¶104

Age: Solears, Oc6: Carpenter,

¶105

.. IT, ITra Sandhya Rani, w /o^p. Brahmam.

¶106

...ACCUSED No.2

¶107

Age: 4Oyears, Occ: House wife,

¶108

Miss. pusala Veneela, D/o^p. Brahmam,

¶109

...ACCUSED No.3

¶110

Age: 24years, Occ: Unempioyed,

¶111

(AIl the above are resirJins at R/o H.No.2l _2_t t4/3.,.#:::"::"rrX".-"3f1{a!i'"varikhan^{i, R? ;;,1 ; # r";i 1.1, o"oo} r r i, re r a nga n a "oa

¶112

5 THE STATE OF TELANGANA Through public prosecu tor, Hon'ble High Court of Telangana

....RESPONDENT NO.2

i
<br>

JOINT COMPR OMISE

ItishumblysubmittedthatthePetitionerandtherespondentNo.l to4havecompromisedthematteroutofthecourtwiththeintervention of elders and^{well wishersand in view of the compromisethey do not want} tofurtherproceedwiththecaseagairrstPetitioners/AccusesNo.lto4in SC.SPL No.8l/2021,^{which ispending pefore Hon'ble VIAddl'} Metropolitan^{Session Judge, Hyderabad Dist' Telangana'as such the same} maybeqrrashedagainstthePetitioners/Accusesintheinterestofjustice.

¶117

Place : Hyderabad. Date: c/o -06-2024 E'.-+ ;? ,d;6J 7^{,tg^u-il^-} RtrSPONDtrNT NO.l^{to 4}

¶118

-1-7 \ g-- .,-)
COUNSET F6R RESPO NDENT NO.i to 4.

¶119

M S^^J )^@ PETITIONE R COU L FOR PETTTI^ONER

Mr.Pusala Charan Teja v. Smt. Munigadapa Sandhya Rani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr.Pusala Charan Teja v. Smt. Munigadapa Sandhya Rani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pottipally Vijay kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Ravi Banoth Vs The State of Telangana

Sri Anegu Jalender Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Burma Ashok Vs the State of Telangana

Nagalakshmi Neelam Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammad Mosin Ali Vs The State of Telangana