Dismissed

P. Chinranjeevi v. Thatikonda Prasad

Telangana HC2 Sept 2024CRLP/6891/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR proceedings, the High Court of Telangana dismissed the petition as infructuous because the Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the charge sheet had already been laid.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition No. 6891 of 2024 dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to file fresh petition if cause survives.

P. Chinranjeevi Vs Thatikonda Prasad — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³³⁸⁵ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

N/ONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEIVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:6891 OF 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

1 P. Chinranjeevi, R/o Hetro Pest Solutions, Shop No.1, TSHB, OU Road, Vidyanagar, Hyderabad, 500044

¶9

2 Gnaneshwar_ Sqngapu, S/o Late Narayanaswamy, Aged 69 years, Occ: Business, R/o H.No.2-2-1 107-57, Tilak Nagar, New Naiiakunta Hyderabad - 500044.

¶10

...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED

¶11

AND

¶12

1 Thatikonda Pra_sad, S/o Gangadhar, Aged about 26 years, Occ. Business, R/o Plot No^'101, 2"' Floor, Lalitha Colony, Ramnagar Gundu, Hyderabad - 500044.

¶13

2 State of Telangana, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶14

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr _P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the lVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in FIR No.175 of 2024, dated 20-04-2024 on the file of the P.S. Nallakunta, Hyderabad.

¶16

l.A. NO: I OF 2024

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C. , praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in FIR No.175 of 2024, dated 20-042024 on the file of the P.S Nallakunta, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition in the interest of justice, and pass

¶18

1 This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lVerhorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri T DAMODAR, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Sri Konda Srinivas the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and None Appeared for the Respondent No.1

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

THE HONOURABLE SMT.^{JUSTICEK. SUJANA} CRIMINAL PETIT^{ION No.689lof 2024}

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

The present Criminal Petition^{is filed seeking the} Court to quash the proceedings^{that are pendingagainst} the petitioners in Crime No.175^{of 2024 of Nallakunta} Police Station, Hyderabad.

¶23

Learned Additional Public^{Prosecutor,on written} instructions, submitted that charge^{sheet is laid and} therefore, the Criminal Petition^{has become infructuous.}

¶24

Recording the said submission,^{the Criminal Petition} is dismissed as infructuous^{grantingliberty tothe} petitioners to move a fresh petition in case^{the cause} survlves.

¶25

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions^{pending, if a-ny,}

¶26

sha-ll stand closed.

¶27

Sd/- K A AJI ASSISTANT^REGIS,TRAR

¶28

//TRUE^COPY// \ SECTION^OFFICER

¶29

¶30

The Station House Offier,^{Nallakunta PoliceStationHvderabacl'} 2 Two ccs to the Public^{P;o;;;;it1','irigh c-o"t for the State of relanganaat} Hvderabad^(OUT) 3 o;;"bC 6^'sH i onrr,rooAR'^{Advocate [oPUC]} 4 Two CD Copies Ctl/orsk

HIGH^COURT

DATED:0210912024

ORDER

CRLP.No.6891^{of 2024}

¶35

4:
s-
,t(n1ut st
,.' '
t
o_) IL
fl 4 l,l[! ?I1?l t 'l
\r- =:aa :--'/'
!

¶36

DISMISSING^{THE CRL.PETITION}

¶37

AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶38

4*@ yifrlt"l->t

P. Chinranjeevi v. Thatikonda Prasad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Chinranjeevi v. Thatikonda Prasad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Peddintigolla Mekala Srinu Alias Srinu Vs The State of Telangana

Nazima Begum Vs The State of Telangana

M.Satish Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Santosh Kumar Vs State of Telangana

Kalvakuntla Thejeshwar Rao @ Kalvakuntla Kanna Rao, Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Akka Nagamma Vs The State of Telangana