Dismissed

Ravinder Reddy v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC4 Oct 2024CRLP/4767/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Telangana High Court dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings as infructuous. The Court noted that the main case had ended in acquittal on 14.08.2023, rendering the current petition unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

The criminal petition was dismissed as infructuous pending miscellaneous applications were closed.

Ravinder Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4767 OF 2020

¶6

Between:

¶7

Ravinder.Reddy, S/o- Yodhi Reddy, Aged 41 years, Occ. Business, R/o.H.No.5-190, Nedunur Kandukur Mandal, Cyberabad, Telangana.

¶8

.....PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO^.I

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana, Rep, by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad.

¶11

Sri Soma Rama Lingaiah, S/o. Late S. Narsaiah, Aged about 51 years, Occ. Civil Engineer, o.H.No.9-9-2218, Reddy Colony, Champapet, Hyd-erabad, Telangana.

¶12

,....RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶13

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the criminal proceedings in C.C.No.488 of 2015 in Crime No.423 of 2012 of PS Saidabad, Hyderabad, on file of the Vll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate At Hyderabad, for the offence alleged Under Sec.44B, 506,342,509, RA/i/ 34 of IPC

¶14

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2020

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the Petitioner/Accused No.1 herein in C_C.No.4BB of 2015 in Crime No. 423 of 2012 of PS Saidabad, Hyderabad, on file of the Vll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate At Hyderabad, for the offence alleged Under Sec.44B, 506,342,509, RA// 34 of IPC

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V RAGHUNATH ,Advocate for the^Petitioner (not being^present) and the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.-1 and of Sri KASIREDDY JAGATHPAL REDDY, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

--7

¶19

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL} CRIMINAL PETITI ONN^{0.4767 0F 2020}

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

This Criminal Petition is^{filed underSection 482 of the Code} of Criminal Procedure^{(for short 'Cr.P.C.') by the petitioner-} accused No.1 to^{quash the proceedings againsthim in C'C'No'488} of 2015 pending^{on the file of learned VII AdditionalChief} Metropolitan^{Magistrateat Hyderabad,registeredfor the offences} under Sections 448,^{506, 342, 509 read with Section 34 of the} It Indial Penal^{Code (for short 'IPC)'}

¶22

Today, when the matter^{has been taken up, Sri E'Ganesh,} learned Assistant Public^{Prosecutor for respondent No' 1 -State} while furnishing a^{copy of online case status report, submitted} that this matter^{has becomeinfructuousand that the cause in} this matter does not^{survive as the main case in C'C'No'488of} 2015 on the file of^{the learned vII Additional chief Metropolitan} Magistrate at^{Hyderabad, was ended in acquittal on l4'O8'2O23} and prayed to^{close this Criminal Petition.}

¶23

There is no representation on^{behalf of the petitioner'}

¶24

¶25

The copy of online case status report submitted by the learned Assistant public prosecutor for respondent No.1-state is taken on record.

¶26

[-:

¶27

Recording the above submission, this Criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶28

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

¶29

¶30

Sd/. A. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT.REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/I

sefrroru oFFrcER

To,

'1. The Vll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate At Hyderabad

¶35

The Station House Officer, Saidabad, Police Station Saidabad, Hyderabad

¶36

One CC to SRI V RAGHUNATH Advocate [OPUC]

¶37

TWO CCs to the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of

¶38

Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶39

One CC to Sri KASIREDDY JAGATHPAL REDDY, Advocdte [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies -/

C\ -\ -

HIGH COURT

DATED:0411O12024

ORDER

CRLP.No.4767 oI 2O2O

1 L S r,l (
Q^
,{
+ r
cJ I
11 urI r324
a
oF:.sPATCts (-o

¶46

DISSMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS Ynzatrh-l a

Ravinder Reddy v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravinder Reddy v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri.Ediga Ramulu Goud and another Vs The State of T.S and another

Avadesh Bihari Sharma Vs The State of Telangana

M/S Esperanza Corporate (P) Ltd., and Anr., Vs State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

Sri. T. Praveen Kumar Vs Smt.G. Sunitha

Dr.P.Namratha ,Neeraja Vs The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

Mr B Srinivas Goud Vs The State of Telangana