High Court dismissed Criminal Petition No. 2754 of 2020 for non-prosecution, noting absence of representation at hearing despite multiple listings.
Criminal Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ss ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E,V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINA L PETITION NO: 2754 OF 2020
Between:
...Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 &2
AND
.. ResPondent /ComPlainant
...RespondenU Defacto'Complainants
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Groundsof criminalPetition,the High courtmay be pleased to quash the (Charge Sheet) C.C. No.593/2019, uls.324,504'506 r/w 34 of IPC as against thepetitioners/accusedNos 1 and 2 pendingon the file of Hon'ble Judicial First Class Magistrate,at Kodangal.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2O2O
Petition under section 482 ofcr.P .c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Groundsof criminal Petition, the High court maybe pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrestof the Petitioners in crime iilo. 120 of ZOig for the offences CrimeNo. 120 of 2019 uls- 324' 504,506 r/w 34 of IPC pending on the file PS,Maddur of pendingdisposal of abovecriminal petitron.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition'and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Royyala Thirupathaiah, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Sri E. Ganesh Asst public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.i and of Sri K. Venkatesh Gupta Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER:-
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No.27S4 of 2O2O
ORDER:
None appears for the petitioners though the matter rvas listed today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even on the previous dates of hearing i.e., on O1.O2.2O24, 02.07.2024, 23.09.2024, 24.O9.2024 and 25.09.2024, there was no i representation for the petitioners. Thus, it appears that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute the matter vigilantty and diligently any more. Therefore, this Criminal Petition is liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution.
prosecutron
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
closed
To,
ASSISTANTsd/_ A.V.S.PRASAD EGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII SEC OFFICER
lf6tlAffi,l"-uS-',1"-Hdt#1lffi,{,i*ffi r jl'
$
HIGH COURT
DATED:031'1012024
ORDER
5 1AT E
(
a 5U<br>tt
I
r pE5o p,i
CRLP.No.2754 ot 2020
CRIMINAL PIIT.ITION IS DISMISSEDFOR NON- PROSECUTION
q 1k
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be quarshed or stayed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. Ediga Ramulu Goud
Smt. Ediga Sunandini
The State of T.S
Smt. Ediga Sujatha
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
