Disposed

Puppala Prem Sagar v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC9 Feb 2024CRLP/1527/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC, the High Court refused to quash proceedings. Upon finding that disputed questions of fact remained, the Court restricted the petitioner's prayer to abandoning their physical appearance at the trial Court. The Criminal Petition was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

The appearance of the petitioners before the trial Court was dispensed with until specifically needed; subject to counsel representation.

Puppala Prem Sagar Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD}

¶2

FRIDAY,THE^{NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY FOUR}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE^{SMT JUSTICEK. SUJANA}

¶5

cRl IN P TION NO:^{1527oF 2024}

¶6

Between:

¶7

1 . Puppala^{Prem Sagar, S/o' PadmaR*'-^11".^34vears'Caste Mala'} '' bclPrivate Employee, Fl/o'Mubraknagar' Nizamabad'

¶8

1. Puppala @^{Acha o.'" 'f'-'*'lwo F'd"Rao'Age52 years' Caste Mala'}

¶9

o-..[liori wife, Fl/o Mubraknagar' N izamabad'

¶10

1. Puppala^{Padma Rao, U"' l''ii'lr'A.oe 57. vears'CasteSc Mala' occ'} - btiilt"irptoyee, Ryo' Mubraknagar' Nizamabad 4 Puooala Navamani,^{d;' il;-Rao'} Age 23^{yeats' caste SC Mala'} '' b"listra"nt, R/o.Mubaraknagar' Nizamabad ^ ^

¶11

Puppala^{o"y. sug",SfFiot' n'o' Age 26} ^ ^^^{years'casteSC Mala'occ'} " p;IIGEmpiov".,*Fyo' Mubaraknagar' Nizamabad'

¶12

...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED^{No'1to 5}

¶13

AND

¶14

The State^{of Telangana, through SHo PS Jagtial, Representedby the Public} ProsecutorHighCourtofTelangna ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶15

Chennala @^{Puppala Sravani,WoPremSagar' Age 27 yea$' Caste Mala'} Rl/o Lingapur'^{occ House *'t"}

¶16

...aaroNDENT/DEFA.r.^co'LATNANT

¶17

Petition under^{section 482 of cr.P.cprayingthat in the circumstances} stateA in ine^{Memorandumof Groundsof Criminal Petition'the HighCourt may} oJ^pf""".O io^{quash the charge sneet in CC No' 1282.oF 2022 on the file of ll} naJiLn-"r-trOicial^{MagistratJotFirstClass' Jagtial in Cr'No 7212022daled} O2.O4.2O23 on^{the file of SHOPS Jagtial'}

¶18

l.A NO:1 oF²⁰²⁴

¶19

Petition under^{Section 482 of Cr'P'Cprayingthat in the ci'aumstances} stated in ihe^{Memorandumof Groundsof Criminal Petition'the HighCourt may} U. pj""tilt Siini^{stayof all further proceeding-sin CC No 1282 OF 2o22 on} tr,L"tir".irr Adiitionat^{JudiciatMagstraie of First Ctass, Jagtial in Cr.No.72120.22} i"t"i oz.oa.zoii^{on the file of SilOPS Jagtial including the appearanceof the} petitioners on the file of SHO^{PS Jagtial'}

¶20

This Petition coming^{on for hearing, upon perusing theMemorandum of} Grounds of^{CriminalPeiition and upo-nhearing the argumentsof Sri N}

¶21

SRUSHMAN REDDY,^{Advocate for the Petitioner and the PublicProsecutor on} Oehalf of the^{RespondentNo.i and none appeared for the Respondent No 2'}

¶22

The Court made^{the following:ORDER}

¶23

THE HONOURABLE SMT.^{JUSTICE K. SUJANA}

¶24

¶25

CRIMINAL PETITIO^{N No.1527of2024}

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

In this criminal^petition, the^{petitioners,who are accused} Nos. 1to 5, seek to^{quash the proceedingsagainst themin} C.C.No. 1282 of^{2022 pendingon the file of the lI AdditionalJudicial} Magistrate of First^{Classat Jagtial.}

¶28

After arguing for some^{time, whenthis Court has expressed} its opinion stating^{that the said contentions are disputed questionsof} fact which need to^{be gone into by the trial Court,Iearned counsel for} the petitioners^{restricted his prayer to the extent of dispensing with} the presence of tJ:e^{petitionersbefore the tria-lCourt'}

¶29

Hence, the appearance^{of the petitioners before the trial Court} is dispensed^{with unless their presenceis specifrcally required during} the course of trial,^{subjectto the condition of petitionersbeing} represented by their^{counsel on every date of hearing'}

¶30

Accordingly, the Criminal^{Petition is disposed of'Pending} miscellaneous^{petitions,if any, in this Criminal Petition shall also}

¶31

stand closed.

¶32

,ITRUE^COPY'I

¶33

SD,-^{AV .S. PRASAD} ASSISTANT^REGtS

FFICER SECTION

To,

iffifi,;"g*ffinu$**-e**isi:i:1"anna

iak

HIGH COURT

DATED:0910212O21

ORDER

iHE rj o
<br>e
-.,:
U 1 5 FEB 202f
l
.|r
D ti.:-p,'..-r a I

¶44

:il1! :,

¶45

CRLP.No.1527^{of 2024}

¶46

¶47

CRIMINAL^{PETITION IS DISPOSED OF}

¶48

(v<br>\t,<br>

Puppala Prem Sagar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Puppala Prem Sagar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mekala Raghuma Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Md. Haneef Vs The State of Telangana

Koya Praveen Kumar Reddy Vs the State of Telangana

Shravan Pachpoote Vs The State Of Telangana

Guntuka Madhubabu, Vs The State of Telangana

J. Rajender Kumar Vs the State of Telangana