Remanded

Shree Samarth Kamadhenu Gow Shala v. High Court for the State of Telangana

Telangana HC3 Dec 2024CRLP/14692/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana, on a criminal revision petition regarding an order payable as cattle maintenance, noted the trial court's failure to follow mandatory procedures and under-calculating maintenance costs. The Court remanded the matter to the trial court for fresh consideration and expeditious disposal.

What did the court decide?

The matter was remanded to the trial court for fresh consideration and disposal in accordance with Section 35 of the PCA.

Shree Samarth Kamadhenu Gow Shala Vs High… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

'...

¶2

[³³⁸⁵ ]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} Ar HYDenAano

¶4

TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY^{OF DECEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry^FOUR

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE^{K. SUJANA}

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION N o^{:14692 OF 2024}

¶8

Between:

¶9

Shree Samarth Kamadhenu^Gow Shala,^{Opp. GHMC Colony, ShivaBagh,} JivaguOa, Puranapul,^{Hyderabad,500006 through its Representltive} Fiiu".r,otha, Gupta, S/o'^{Rampathalal Gupta, Age.5B Years, occ Gow} Sevak, R/o H.N.o.'21-1-214,^{NearHighCourt,Hyderabad.}

¶10

...Petitionerff hird PartY

¶11

AND

¶12

1- The State of Telangana,^{Rep by Public Prosecutor High Court of Hyderabad'} .) Daraupu Satish, S/o. Eswara^{Rao,age. 25} ,Occ.^{Khandipalli,village} Chodavaram Mandal,Anakapalli^district

¶13

J Molli Marinayya, S/o. Sriamulu,^{Age.42yrs,Occ. Labour,R/ o.} H.O-Z+O,seetharampuram^{villagem,Payakaraoetamandal,Ankaplli district'}

¶14

...RespondenUPetitioner/Com^plainant

¶15

Petition under Section 528^{of BNSS Act, 2023praying that in the} circumstances stated in the^{Memorandumof Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High} court may be^pleased to call^{for the records pertainto the orderg in 25-10-2024in} cRL MP.']r|o.1396 of 2024^{in crimeNo. 461 of 2024 (P.S.Abdullapurmet ) of the} Principal Junior civil Judge-cum-XlV^{Additional Judicial Magistrateof First} class, Rangareddy^Diskct at^{Hayathnagarand quash /set-a-sidethe same as} abuse of the^process of^Law.

¶16

l.A.NO:.2OF 2024

¶17

Petition under Section^{528 of BNSSAct, 2023praying that in the} circumstances stated^{in the Memorandumof Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High} Court 25-10-2024 may be in^pleased CRL.MP.No.1396 to^{suspend ot the 2024 Orders in in Crime to suspend No. 461 the Orders of 2o24} -in (P.S.Abdullapurmet) of the Principal^{JunioI Civil Judge-cum-XlV Additional Judicial} Magistrate of First blass,Rangaieddy^{Diskctat Hayathnagar pending disposalof} the above criminal^petition.

¶18

This Petition coming^{on for hearing,uponperusingthe Memorandumof} Grounds of criminal^{F,etition and uponhearingthe arguments of Sri G L Narasimha} Rao, Advocate for^{the Petitionerand} sri^{Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional} public Froseiutor on behalf of the Respondent No.i and none appeared^{for the} Respondent No.2.

¶19

The Court made the^{following: ORDER}

¶20

THE HONOURABLE^SMT. ",T;S1'ICE^{K. SUJANA} CRIMINAL PETITION l{o.^{14692 of 2A24}

¶21

OR.DER:

¶22

This Criminal Petition is^{filed under Section 528} Bharatiya Nagarik^{SurakshaSanr', jta} 2023^(ior strort^BNSS]bY the petitioner set^{aside the order d'lred 25' lO'2O24 passed in} Cr1.M.P.No.1396^{of 2024 inCr:irrte No'46 1 ol 2024 by the} Principal Junior^{Civil Judge-L)ura-XIVAddilionaiJudicia-l} Magistrate^{of First Class, Ranga1:'srk-11'Disr-rictat Hayathnagar'} By the impugned^{order,the petitio!1filea nirrler Section35 of} PCA read with^{3 to 5 PCA, r-ules, 20 17' i'r'as allor,'ed by the rrial} Court directing^{the accused to pai' Iis go'000/- for maintenance} of cattles from^{24.O8.2O24 to 25 tC')n24'}

¶23

¶24

2 Heard Sri^{G.L.Narsirnh.'-i?i;r.learne:cL counsei for the} petitioner and Sri^Veeramalla 'Jiihe;iiier^{Rao'lean-tredAdditional} Public Prosecutor^{for respondent I{o i - Stale'}

¶25

. Learned counsel^{for the petiiionersubnlitted that the} triai Court^{has passed the imptr-gnecl ordervvithoutfollowing the} .mandatory^{proceduresnd61 Section 35 of the PCA' He further} submitted that^{though there are 24 ca'tt1esand maintenarrce of} each cattle^{costs Rs.25O} l-^{pes.da-:z' l::e tria] Court tras awarded}

r
I

only Rs.90,0r)0 /- tawarcis^{rn.iultenance of cattles'Hence' he} prayed the Court io allorv the^{(lriminatPetition} '

¶30

In view of^i-he sr-Lbnisslons made^{by the iearned counsel} for the petitloner, this^{Ll'-rlt rr has perusedthe record' Itis} apparent that there are^{2+ urtties whichcosts around Rs'25O/-} per day for maintenance of^{each cattle} '^{Hence,consideringthe} facts and circum stances^{of the case, this Court is inclined to} remand back the^{rnatter to the trial court for freshconsideration} and the trial Court is^{riirectedto dispose of the matteras} expeditiously as^{possibie by followingthe procedure under} Section 35 of the^PC:A.

¶31

With the abcve: clirection,^{theCrimina-l Petition is} disposed of.

¶32

Miscellaneous^ai:1'li, iJrons,^{if any pending, shall also}

stand closed

To,

,l.ThePrincipalJuniorCivilJudge-cum-XlVAdditionalJudicialMagistrateof ' ii,"t ci"td,nangareddy Distrct at Hayathnagar ^.

¶38

,. il;'stat;;^{iou"seoriter, Abdullapu'rme1Police station,Rachakonda} ;. i;;;; tne^{puuric Prosecutor,'HighCourt for the State of Telangana at} . Bll%t?j^{l?uJl r'r",,'i'n" Rao,Advocate[oPUc]} 5. Two CD^CoPies

ADK/gh

\qr

F
H
,.jia
.T

HIGH COURT

DATED:0311212024

,.
l

ORDER

CRLP.No.14692 of 2024

¶49

rF""
$€ STA A
(
(-
cA
a
I o) 2ttz5
05 t.lfifr
II
t OSspa-r

¶50

;!
DISPOSING OF THE CRLF

¶51

4dtol>w

Shree Samarth Kamadhenu Gow Shala v. High Court for the State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shree Samarth Kamadhenu Gow Shala v. High Court for the State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B. Krishna Vs Guduguntla Kotaiah

Goutham Vs K.Rajender Goud

Md. Shakeel Khan Vs Md. Ghouse

Kaneez E Abida Begum Vs Anjuman E Moinul Akwan Ashfia Kingdom

Hina Kausar, Vs Laxmamma

Ammi reddy Venkat Laxmi Vs The state of Telangana