Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Hina Kausar, Vs Laxmamma — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2024)

Home
Telangana HC
2024
Hina Kausar, Vs LaxmammaHina Kausar, v. Laxmamma

Dismissed

Hina Kausar, v. Laxmamma

Telangana HC3 Dec 2024CRP/4842/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Revision Petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of party representation on multiple occasions despite court intimations.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

[³³⁸⁵¹

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY ,THE THIRD^{DAY OF DECEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY FOUR}

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT^{JUSTICE K. SUJANA}

CIVIL REVISION PETI TION^{NO| 4a42oF2014}

Petition under Article^{227 oI the constitutionof lndia, aggrievedby the} docket order daIed27.11.2014^{madein lA No. 258 ot 2013 in o.s.No.6480f} 2008 on the file of the^{court of the ll Additional senior civil Judge, Ranga Reddy} District

Between:

Hina Kausar D/o.^{M.A. Sattar, aged about 35 years, Occu.pationHousehold'} iiiij, ri. rlo.ioi -lsii^{t t s, Kitwitnl uew shaalibandaRoad, Hvderabad}

...PETITIONER/PETITIONER (DEFENDANT No. 17)

AND

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Hina Kausar
respondent
Laxmamma

Coram

AI extract

K. SUJANA

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Telangana HC
Decided on: 3 Dec 2024 · December
Registered: 17 Dec 2014
Case no.: CRP/4842/2014

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from K. Sujana

B. Krishna Vs Guduguntla Kotaiah
2 Dec 2024
Goutham Vs K.Rajender Goud
2 Dec 2024
Md. Shakeel Khan Vs Md. Ghouse
2 Dec 2024
Kaneez E Abida Begum Vs Anjuman E Moinul Akwan Ashfia Kingdom
3 Dec 2024

Cite this judgement

Hina Kausar, v. Laxmamma, CRP/4842/2014 (TEL), decided on 3 December 2024.

The High Court for the State of Telangana publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

K. SUJANA

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution and Section 151 CPC was dismissed for non-prosecution. The Court held that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on several occasions, even after intimations for dismissal. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, were stood closed.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Laxmamma Wo.^{Jangaiah, aged about64 years,-Occupation HousewifSaF"} H. No.^{1 g_g-223 t 121 tc'i3, RaiaNarsimha colony, Kanchanbagh,HyoeraDao.}

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT^No'1 (PLAINTIFF)

Darga Chandraiah^{S/o. late} Ungaiah, aged^{about 64 yers,Occupation} Agriculture.

Darga Achaiah S/o.^{Late Lingaiah, aged about 5O years' Occupation} Agriculture.

Darga Yadaiah S/o.^{Late Yenkaiah, aged about 64 years'Occupation} Employee.

Raachamalla^{Nangaiah, S/o. Late Pentaiah, aged about 61 years' Occupation} Agriculfure.

Pedda Gandu^{Jangamma Wo Late Ramulu'aged about66 years'} Occupation^{Ag r'tculture.}

Puthugantee^{VenkaiahS/o. Laxmaiah, aged about 65 years' Occupation} Agriculture.

B. Puthugantee^{DevaiahS/o. Laxmaiah,aged about61 years'Occupation} Agriculture.

Puthugantee Raju S/o. P. Pentaiah, aged about 4'1 years, Occupation Agriculture.

Rachamalla Ratnam S/o Late Balaiah, aged about 36 years, Occupation Agriculture-

1 1 . Rachamalla Kumar S/o. Late Balaiah, aged about 31 years, Occupation Agriculture.

12, Rachamalla Sailu S/o Late Pochaiah, aged about 46 years, Occupation Ag riculture.

Rachamalla Venkatswamy S/o Late Pochaiah, aged about 41 years, Occupation Agriculture.

Rachamalla Ramaswamy S/o. Late Pochaiah, aged about 41 years, Occupation Agriculture.

15.Naga Reddy gudam Balaiah S/o. Chandraiah, aged about 56 years Occupation Agriculture.

16.Naga Reddy gudam Pochaiah S/o. Chandraiah, aged about 5'l years, Occupation Agriculture.

(R.R.2 to 16 are R/o Shamshabad Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District)

17.V.T. Prakash S/o. V. Tulsi Ram, aged about 51 years, Occupation Business, R/o. Gagan- Pahad Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

K. Pratima Wo. K. Suneela Veer Reddy, aged about 39 years, Occupation Business, Rio. 16-30/tu29, Saidabad Colony, Hyderabad.

19 G Karthik Reddy S/o._G. Satya Veer Reddy, aged about 34 years, Occupation Business, Rt/o. Chintakunta Villagie, Devarakonda Mindal, Nalgonda District.

20.G. Krishna Reldy S/o G- Narayana, aged about 86 years, Occupation Business, R/o. Chintakunta Village, Devarakonda Mandal, Nalgonda Disirict.

...Respondents/Respondents

(Defundants 1 to 16 and 18 to 20)

(R.R. 2 to 20 herein are not necessary parties to this C.R.p.)

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(CRPMP. NO: 6592 0F 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pteased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.648 of 2008 on the file of ll Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of C.R.p.,

IA NO: 1 OF 2024

Between:

Laxmamma D/o. Jangaiah,^{aged about 70 years,-Occupation Housewif,"' yo} H. No.¹ 8-8-223^{I 121} l0l3,^{Raja Narsimha Colony,Kanchanbagh'Hyoeraoao'} ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT^No'1

AND

,1 . Hina Kausar D/o. M.A. Sattar, aged about 43 years, occupation Household, nio. n -rub.2 o4-194n fi 5, f^{iwatnilrtew Shaalibdnda Road, Hyderabad'}

Z. Diarga Chandraiah S/o.^{late Lingaiah,aged about 72 yers,Occupation} Agriculture.

Darga Achaiah S/o.^{Late Lingaiah, aged about 56 years,Occupation} Agriculture.

4.DargaYadaiahS/o.LateYenkaiah,agedaboutT2yea$,Occupation Employee.

Raachamalla^{Nagaiah, S/o'Late Pentaiah,aged about 69 years, Occupation} Agriculture.

Pedda Gandu^{Jangamma Wo. Late Ramulu'aged about 74 years'} Occupation Agriculture.

T.PuthuganteeYenkaiahS/o.Laxmaiah,agedaboutT4years'Occupation Agriculture.

B. Puthugantee^{Devaiah S/o. Laxmaiah,aged about69 years' Occupation} Agriculture.

Puthugantee^{Raju S/o. P. Pentaiah,aged about 49 years'Occupation} Agriculture.

Rachamalla^{Ratnam S/o. Late Balaiah, aged about 44 yeats,occupation} Agriculture.

1 1 . Rachamalla Kumar^{S/o' Late Balaiah,aged about 39 years' Occupation} Agriculture.

Rachamalla sailu s/o.^{Late Pochaiah, aged about 54 years, occupation} Agriculture.

l3.RachamaHa^{VenkatswamyS/o. Late Pochaiah'aged about 49 years'} Occupation Agriculture.

14- Rachanralla Ramaswamy^{S/o. Late Pochaiah, aged about 47 years'} Occupation Agriculture.

'l5.NagReddy gudam Reddy Balaiah S/o. Chandraiah'^{aged about64 years'} Occupation Agriculture.

l6.NagReddy^{gudam PochaiahS/o. Chandraiah, aged about 59 years'} Occupation Agriculture.

(AllRespdts.2to16allR/oShamshabadVillageandMandal,RangaReddy District)

17.v.T. Prakash s/o. V. Tursi Ram, aged about 59 years, occupation Business. R/o. Gasan-^pahad Vi,ase, Rajendianagar Minoii, nlnga R5il;'il;d;i:'*'

" 5;.lui3Xl ?.,i'l?. 5r,i,IU i J,iEl #Etli" iy:fl ,E:l"t"i7 vea^{rs, occupatio n}

19.G. Karthik Reddv S/o G. Satya Veer Reddy, aqed about 42 vears Occupation Busiriess, R/o. Chintakunta Village, Devarakonda tvt6ndal, Nalgonda District

D. Krishna Reddv S/o. .^D. ..Narayana,^{aged about 91 years,Occupation}

Business, R/o Chintakunta VittageiDev'ariioiol-r,a"nol,, GGJ"o"b-i"irili. "

(Respondents No. 2 to 20 are not necessary parties to this petition)

...Respondents/Respondents

Petition under Section 15i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim order dated: 05-02-2015 in cRp No.4g42 of 2014 passed by this Hon'ble Court.

Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. Bharadwaj Associates

Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: Sri patil Shankar Rao

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE^{SMT. JUSTICE K' SUJANA}

CTvIL REVISION^{PEf,ITIONNo. 4842of 2014}

ORDER:

There is^{no representation on behalf of the petitioneron} severaloccasions'Despite[stingthematterunderthe caption^{for dismissal',even today' there is no representation} on behalf^{of the} Petitioner'

Therefore,^{this Civil RevisionPetition is dismissedfor} non-prosecution'^{There shallbe no order as to costs'}

As a sequel,^{the miscellaneouspetitions' if any' pending} in the Civil^{Revision eetitigl s]r,{!{91$ c1o99d'}

SdI. T. JAYASREE ASSIST^AT REGISTRAR

,TTRUE^COPY"

s TION OFFICER

To,

2 rx?'it'.t'[q!iFa!!,^E1**':ffir#1ff Ht'dir,rt 3 One CC^{to Sri Patil Shanka} 4. Two CD^CoPies

VH/gh o

t. I

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0311212024

ORDER

HE S r,1 rF
o 1 0 Ftil 20?5 vaz
-<br>4'
* +
::.:!::::y;,

CRP.No.4842 ol 2014

DISMISSING THE CRP FOR NON.PROSECUTION

0 ?,<br>

CNR

HBHC010454522014

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Disposal

DISMISSED AS NON PROSECUTION

Ammi reddy Venkat Laxmi Vs The state of Telangana

3 Dec 2024

Pathlavath Shankar Vs The State of Telangana

3 Dec 2024