Allowed

Shaik Samiulla Sameer v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC9 Feb 2024CRLP/1406/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail sought under Sections 437 and 439 Cr.P.C. for Accused No.2 in an NDPS case involving seizure of about 1.3 kg ganja. With no criminal antecedents reported and only intermediary quantity seized, the Court enlarged the petitioner on bail subject to bond and Section 437(3) conditions.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted on Rs.25,000 personal bond with two sureties, subject to Section 437(3) Cr.P.C. conditions.

Shaik Samiulla Sameer Vs The State of Telangana — Narcotics (NDPS) | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI

¶3

CRIMINAL PETITION No.1406 OF 2024

¶4

O R D E R:

¶5

This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 437 and

¶6

439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “Cr.P.C”) seeking regular bail to the petitioner/Accused No.2 in Crime No.11 of 2024 on the file of Station House Officer, Malkajgiri Police Station, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) read with 20(b)(ii)(B) of Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act-1985.

¶7

The case of the prosecution in brief was that on 07.01.2024 on reliable information, the Sub Inspector of Police of Malkajgiri Police Station conducted vehicle checking in front of AMR planet, Moula-Ali, Malkajgiri and found two persons coming on a Honda Activa Vehicle bearing No.TS-08HY-4416 and on checking the vehicle found 34 Ziplock covers and one big plastic cover with the contraband substance in the dickey, conducted panchanama and seized the contraband. On weighing it found that the 34 packets were containing 20 grams each, total 680 grams and the loose ganja on weighment found to be 620 grams, total 1300 grams,

¶8

¶9

seized the same under the cover of panchanama by following due procedure of law and brought the accused to the Police Station and lodged the report.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused No.2 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondentState.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was non-compliance of Section 50 of Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act-1985 as the samples were drawn in the presence of mediators but not in the presence of Magistrate. He further contended that the petitioner was a degree student and prayed to enlarge him on bail.

¶12

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that there were no criminal antecedents reported against the petitioner/accused No.2 herein and an intermediary quantity of contraband was seized from his possession.

¶13

Considering the submissions of both the learned counsel, as there were no criminal antecedents reported against the petitioner and only an intermediary quantity of

¶14

¶15

dry ganja of about 1.3 Kgs was seized from the possession of the petitioner herein, this Court deems it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner/accused No.2 on regular bail on certain conditions:

¶16

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the petitioner/accused No.2 shall be released on regular bail subject to the following conditions:

¶17

i) The petitioner/Accused No.2 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, MedchalMalkajgiri District at Kushaiguda.

¶18

ii) The petitioner/Accused No.2 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.

¶19

8. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand

¶20

closed.

¶21

_______________________ Dr. G.RADHA RANI, J

¶22

Date: 09.02.2024 dsv

Shaik Samiulla Sameer v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaik Samiulla Sameer v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T. Venkateshwar Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Thudam Murali Vs The State of Telangana

B. Laxmi Narsaiah Goud @ Papaiah Goud Vs The State of Telangana

Edaboina Raju Vs The State of Telangana

V Upender Vs the State of Telangana

Katta Gopi Vs The State of Telangana