Allowed

Ilaveni Narsimgam v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC13 Sept 2024CRLP/2247/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the crpc and I.A.s after recording a compromise between parties in C.C. No. 1246 of 2022. Proceeds against the petitioner were quashed subject to payment of Rs. 5,000 to Sainik Welfare and Rs. 5,000 to the Advocates Association.

What did the court decide?

Crim. Pet. No. 2247 of 2024 and I.A. Nos. 3 and 4 of 2024 allowed; proceedings in C.C. No. 1246 of 2022 quashed upon payment of Rs. 10,000 as specified.

Ilaveni Narsimgam Vs The State of Telangana — Cheque Dishonour | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³³⁸⁵ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶6

|.A.NOS.3 AND 4 0F 2024

¶7

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2247 OF 2024

¶9

Between:

¶10

llaveni Narsimgam, S/o Kanakaih, Age 45 yrs, Occ. private Employee, R/o H.no.126, Atrium Colony, Near Reddy Colony, ZPHS Shamirpet.

¶11

...Petitioner / Accused No.2

¶12

AND

¶13

The State of Telangana, Represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the Telangana, at Hyderabad.

¶14

Sri Palthya Kishan, Si/ Ganya, Age.53 yrs, Occ. TSRTC Bus driver, R/o Kodichenpally Thanda, Papannapet Mandal of Medak District.

¶15

...Respondents / De-facto Complainant

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the A/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash CC No.1246 of 2022 pendihg on the file of The Hon,ble X Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, at Medchal.

¶17

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2024

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in with filing of the CC No. j246 of 2022 pending on the file of The X Addl, Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, at Medcha l.

¶19

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2024

¶20

Petition under section 359 (6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to permit the Petitioners/Accused and the 2nd Respondent herein to compound the offences in of cc No. i 246 of 2022 pending on the file of the Hon'ble X Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Medchal.

¶21

|.A.NO.4 0F 2024

¶22

Between:

¶23

llaveni Narsimgam, S/o Kanakaih, Age. 45 yrs, Occ. private Emplovee. R/o H.no.126, Atrium Colony, Near Reddy Cotoni, ZPHS Shamirpet

¶24

...Petitioner / Accused No.2

¶25

AND

¶26

1 The.State.of Telangana, Represented by the public prosecutor, High Court for the Telangana, at Hyderabad.

¶27

Sri Palthya Kishgn, Si/ Ganya, Age.53 yrs, Occ. TSRTC Bus driver, R/o Kodichenpally Thanda, Papannapet Mdndal of Medak District.

¶28

Petition under Section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to consider the oral understandlng between the parties and take the present affidavit on record to quash the proceedings against the petitioner in the present criminal petition vide cc No. 1246 of 2022 pending on the file of the Hon'ble X Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, at: Medchal,

¶29

...Respondents / De-facto Complainant

¶30

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri s. Nagesh Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional public prosecutor (TG/Ap) on behalf of the Respondent No.i and of Sri M. Rajasekhar Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent No.2

¶31

The Court made the following Order:-

I t

t (

, I

I t

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶37

I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2024 inland

¶38

CRIMINAL PETITION N0.2247 of 2024

¶39

COMMON ORDER:

¶40

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2024 have been Iiled to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

¶41

Vide order dated 02.09.2024, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identilication and to submit a report.

¶42

Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court tegal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 1O.O9.2024 and the same is placed on record.

¶43

In view of the above, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2024 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No. 1246 of 2022 on the Iile of the learned X Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Medchal,

¶44

)

¶45

¶46

against the petitioner/accused No.2 are hereby quashed subject to the petitioner paying an amount of Rs.S,0OO/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.No.52188926279, State Bank of India, Shantinagar Branch (2OOZO, IFSC Code:SBINOO2O070, MICR No.50OO04057) and Rs.S,OOO/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and Iile proof of the same before the Registry.

¶47

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand

¶48

closed.

¶49

Sd/. N. S IHARI ASSISTANT REGI TRAR ,TRUE COPYII

¶50

To,

¶51

SECTION OFFICER

¶52

I IE I^OgO,rio.nal^{tVletropotitan Magistrate, Medchat, Cyberabad.}

¶53

z I ne Utatton House Officer, Alwal p.S., Cyberabad Commissionerate.

¶54

Two CCs to the pubtic prosecutor, High borrtioitnu State of Telangana, Hyderabad IOUT].

¶55

!^{One CC to Srr S NageshReddy,Advocate} tOpUCt I 9n"^{CC to Sri M RajasekharReddy,Advocat"} fO-dUCt 6 Two CD Copies

¶56

Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise

¶57

Note:-Total amount of Rs.1O000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) has been paid by Sri S. Nagesh Reddy, Counsel for the petitioner ";;ir;;"J;; the Hon'ble Court vide Ordei dated j3.Og ZO24 as Rs.5,000/- (Rupe;; five thousand only) -^{to the TelanganaiighCourtsAdvocates} Association and Rs.5,000/_ (Rupees five ttrousanO only) to the Sainik Welfare Association 1n!. fyte{ Memo as pr*t of compliance USR No.1 1 1 343t2024, dated 1 4.1 1.2024

VC/DI,

HIGH COURT

DATED:1310912024

rtrr}t-

COMMON ORDER

I.A.Nos.3 AND 4 of 2024 in/and CRLP.No.2247 of 2024

¶65

1 BE S.,^l ;^
k '(. tt
(r'1
10 DEC ?tzj ;l
' it
ttr _
'./

¶66

ALLOWING THE CRLP AND l.A.Nos.3 AND 4 OF 2024

¶67

1@ I^uLl'4'

Ilaveni Narsimgam v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ilaveni Narsimgam v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Methari Uma Rani, Avishipally Uma Rani Vs The state of Telengana and 2 others

Akber Khan Vs The State Of Telangana

Bathini Chandu Vs The State of Telangana

M/s Advaith Bio-fuels Limited Vs The State of Telangana

Koorapati Jyothi Vs The State of Telangana

Sri.K. Srinivasulu Vs The State of Telangana