In a contempt case filed under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, a single judge considered whether respondents of TSRTC disobeyed orders directing payment for sick leave. Finding compliance via procedural orders, the court closed the case without costs.
Contempt case No. 271 of 2024 closed. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 271 OF 2024
Contempt case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 herein for willfully for disobeying and violating the orders dt.31 .01 .2023 passed in W.P. No.401612O18 ot this Honble High Court.
Between:
N. Jangaiah, S/o. Kistaiah, aged 55 years, Occ. Conductor, E. No. 280113, Kalwakurthy Depot, Mahabubnagar Region, Nagarkurnool District. Telangana.
...PETITIONER/Petitioner in W.P.No.ll()1 6/201 8
AND
...Respondents/Respondent Nos.2 & 3 in W.P. NO./t016/2018.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. R DHEERAJ SINGH
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI THOOM SRINIVAS (SC FOR TSRTC)
The Gourt made the following: OROER
THE HON,BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGoPAL
CONTEMPTCA SE No.271 OF 2024 IN WRITPETITI ON No.r015 0F 2018
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed by the petitioner under sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, l9Z1, seeking to punish the respondents for their deliberate and wilful disobedience in noncompliance of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.4016 ot20tg, dated 31.01.2023.
EW,J C.C-No.27 | ot 2A24
Page 2 ot 4
cas€ is that in spite of submitting detailed representation to the respondents on 28.01.2023 requesting to consider the petitioner for the full wages during the sick leave period in pursuance of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.4016 of 20L8 dated 31.01.20?3, tl:re respondents acknowledged the same but they did not consider and pass appropriate orders. Therefore, he again knocked the doors of this Court seekrng to punish the respondents for their wilful disobedience towards the orders of this Court.
EW,J C.C.No.27l of 2b24
Page 3 of4
orders of this Court on the part of the respondents and hence, inclined to
close the contempt case.
Sd/. K. SHYLESHI EPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To,
SECTION OFFICER
cvk
dtl-
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1110312024
ORDER
CC.No.271 of 2024
i.1 Ht: S147. 6
o
k
.t
oJ 1/ r{AY 20'21 a
-b
O5s pAT ct\90 *
CC IS CLOSED.
@o,r*vl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there was wilful disobedience of court orders warranting contempt punishment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N. Jangaiah
Smt. Sridevi
Sri. S. Sreekanth
E.V. VENUGOPAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
