Rathod Swarupa v. Smt. Vakati Karuna IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt case, the petitioner sought punishment for reporters for non-compliance of an earlier order directing consideration for a teaching post. The Court found no wilful disobedience as the matter was addressed via a web note, and closed the case.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case was closed without costs.
What the court decided
[32ee ]
oF TELANGANA rN rHEHIGH ".r.lIoH$JEEfJsE
'SB1'rBi,'rih"'f$Jiff'tl8lffift"'
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTTCEE'V' VENUGOPAL
CONTEMPTCASENO .. 17.31oF 2023
ContemptCase filed Under Sections 10 & 12 of Contemptof CourtsAct to punish therespondents hereinfor wilfully andwantonly not implementingthe Orders daled06.02.2023 passedin Writ PetitionNo 9447 of 2019'
Between:
RathodSwarupa,D/o T19:i."',f:'r:,"'i'n*[.33i0*"'"oo""ilfo1"J"5'?i''33i UnemPloYed,R/o H No Telangana.
...PETITIONER
AND
- secretarv'schoor EducationDepartment'
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents committed wilful disobedience of the court's prior order by not considering the petitioner's representation.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rathod Swarupa
- respondent
secretary school Education Department
- respondent
TSPSC
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1731/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court