Petitioner filed a contempt case alleging non-compliance with an interim order directing payment of her pension. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that after notice, the order was complied with, and the Court closed the contempt case without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32re.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTIETHDAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESMT JUSTICET'MADHAVIDEVI
CONTEMPT CASEN O:2028 0F 2024
ContemptCaseUnderSection10to12ofContemptofCourtsAct,toPunishthe reiponOents for deliberateviolation and willful disobedienceof the order of this Hon'ble Court dated25.7.2023 in l.A NO 1 ol 2023 in W P'No 1870012023'
Between:
M.Navaneetha,w/o Swamidas'Aged' about 74 years'Occ..CP?9. (T:tal' R/o.H.No.2-10-2tA,DayaraStreet,Medaktown,MandalanddistrictMedak.
...PETITIONER
AND
z. smi. snruti ojh;,l.A.S., Commissioner,Women Development and Child Welfare, Stateof Telangana, Hyderabad'
-..RES'ONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl RAJ KUMAR RUDRA
Counsel for theRespondents:GP FOR SERVICES-Ill
The Court madethe following:ORDER
l t
INOIIRABLE SMT.JUSTICE T. MADTIAVI DEVI
CONTEMPTCASENo.2028()F 2024
ORDER:
The Contempt Case isfiled seeking punishmentto the
respondentsunderSectionsl0tol2oftheContemptofCourtAct,for violation and wilfuldisobediencein implementing the orders of this Courtdated25.o7.2023passedinI.A.No.lof2023inW.P'No.18700 ol2023 and topass such otherorder or orders'
2
been complied vvith, the Contempt Case is accordingly closed. There
shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand
dismissed.
Sd/- I. NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPYII
E TION OFFICER
To,
AR/gh
$
HIGH COURT
DAfED:2011212024
ORDER
CC.No.2028 of 2O24
/'/3'7'z sr4
'."(fi' o +
tt.
,
1 I rli 2S25 a. I
i't
-!=
<br>,)i .iPATCII ;o
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WTHOUT COSTS.
G)q'
W
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents violated the Court's order dated 25.07.2023 directing payment of pension to the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. Navaneetha
Smt. Vakati Karuna, IAS
Smt. Shruti Ojha, IAS
Smt. N. Mothi
Smt. Jyothi Padma
G. Laxmibai
T. Madhavi Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
