Vade Lakshmadu v. Sri K. Venkateswarlu
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court closed a contempt case filed alleging violation of an order directing consideration of protesters' representations in a land acquisition dispute. The Court stated relief was unconditionally granted.
What did the court decide?
Petitioners to file application under Section 64 or 72 of the Act. Contempt case closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I I i I
t32e6 I
t
I I I ! I I I I I t l
, I II I !
E I
IN THE HIGHCOURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE SIXTHDAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO TFIOUSANDAND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
CONTE MPTC E NO: 1846oF 2023
Contempt CaseunderSection 10 to 12 of Contempt of CourtsAct'1971to Dunish the Respondentsn"r"i-ioi'ineir-witiiuttyviotatindthe order of this courl iii"a zgiot doftpassedin W.P.No 17548 of 2021'
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt case alleging violation of the Court's orders regarding land award consideration is maintainable.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
L. Vade Lakshmadu
- petitioner
Vade Veerababu
- respondent
K.Venkateswarlu
- respondent
Naveen Mittal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1846/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court