The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous at the instance of counsel, without delving into the merits of the promotion claim filed under Article 226.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3383 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALTSHETW
WRIT PETITION(TR ) NO: 6397 OF 2017
Between:
9lYijgyg, Wlqtt4qlrl,Aged about 48 Years, Occ : Lascar / Attender, 0/o 32 (T) BN NCC, Adilabad, Adilabad District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Direction or an Order more pa(icularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to promote the applicant to the post of Junior Assistant meant for SC (women) at roster point No.2 existing available under the control of the respondents with all consequential benefits and consequenlly declare the memo No.32 (A) B/n/62lAccts dt. -05-2016 of the 4th respondent as illegal, null and void, by holding the action of the respondents in not considering the applicants genuine claim for promotion to the post of Junior Assistant at roster point No.2 as per her seniority and further taking steps to fill up
Counsel for the Petitioner :SRICH.JAGANNATHARAO
Counsel for the Respondents:GP FORYOUTH SERVICES
The Court made the following:ORDER
I I
HON'BLE SRI WSTICE Lfl(MI IIARAYANA ALISHBTTY
WRIT PETITIoNtTRI ilo.6397 0F 2017
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Ch. Jagannatha Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive and a request is made to close the writ petition.
Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.
SD/- MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/I .r / sEcfloN dfrrceR
g
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:1611112023
ORDER
1t'E S TAI t: o
(
v
D Et, ?08 o
0
tA,t
rl l.'f t,
.
WP(TR).No.6397 ot 2017
DISMISSING THE WRITPETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
@do
go-.......-
4-u\pE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging non-promotion survives and requires adjudication.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
9lYijgy
Deputy Director General, NCC Directorate
Assistant Director, NCC Group Headquarters
Colonel, 32 (T) BN NCC
District Collector, Adilabad
State of Telangana
Laxmi Narayana Altshetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
