The High Court of Telangana disposed of Writ Petition (TR) No 2029 of 2017 by dismissing the petition as withdrawn without costs. The court ordered no order as to costs.
no order as to costs
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33831
IN THE H]GH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
WRIT PETITION (TR) NO: 2o2s OF 2017
Between:
Smt-S.Swarupa rani, Wo.B.Bikshapati, aged 50 years, Senior Asst.O/o.Dr.BRKR Govt. Ayurvedic College, Dept.of Ayush Erragadda, r/o.H.No.Plot 163, Pragati Nagar Opp JNTU, Kukkatpalli, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Direction or an Order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to grant appropriate relief, declaring the Proceedings Memo NO.6844/A1/2010 d1.17.4.2O14 issued by the 1st respondent as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutiona l, malafide, discriminatory violating the principles of natural justice apart from violating Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and set aside the same and further declare that the action of the lst respondent in not promoting the applicant as Senior Asst., with effect from the date of promotion of herjuniors in the cadre of Junior Asst., as per the final seniority list issued in proceedings No. 6844/ A. 1 l2O1O dl. 20.2.2O14 and consequently not promoting the applicant as Superintendent on par with her juniors is equally arbitrary, illegal, u nconstitutional violating Article'14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and
issue consequential directions, directing the respondents to forthwith accord notional promotion to the applicant as senior Asst., on par with her juniors in the cadre of Junior Asst., as per seniority list in proceedings No. 6g44t A.1 /2010 dt. 20.2.2o14 and further direct the respondents to further pronrote the applicant as Superintendent on par with her juniors with all consequential benefits.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI P.V.KRISHNAIAH
Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW
The Court made the following: ORDER
i \lI
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.AXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
IVRIT PETITION {TRI NO. 2029 OF 2Ot7
qBpER
Sri ['].V. I(rishnaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner .rddi-esscd a ]etter to the Registry seeklng permission for w itl-rd ra-*':rl as the cause in the u.rit petition does not survive
ro orLlcr as to costs
Vl31..ii',:11'111; iretltions, if arry, pendin;r in this writ :r:rt:i:,r:. l1:.r. 1 :'l..ln,l closed.
SD/. K.SREERAMAMU THY ASSISTANT REGI AR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION FICER
s
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:1511112023
1 g,€ SrAl'E O
/2,I
./ ,:o .<
7
q
B ULT 2[8
Ir
{
\Y,,;
l^,: t otr.L
--
ORDER
WP(TR).N o.2029 of 2017
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
@b?6
t\ Z
Smt-S.Swarupa rani
The Commissioner, Deptt., of Ayush, Govt of A.P.
Further
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
