This Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the non-release of pension and retirement benefits. It was held that as the petitioner had expired, the writ petition was infructuous. No further adjudication was necessary.
Dismissal of the writ petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3383 I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
WRIT PETITION(TR ) NO: 6365 OF 2017
Between:
A Venkat Swamy, S/o, Late Laxman, Aged about 63 years, Occ ; Senior Assistant (Rtd), R/o. 2-4-58, Boyawada, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District, Telangana.
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the respondents in not considering the claim of the applicant for releasing of pension and other retirement benefits even though he retired from service on 30-06-2009 is illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional with a consequential direction to the respondents to release the pension other retirement benefits with admissible interest with all consequential benefits.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI NAYAKAWADI RAMESII
Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES- |
The Court made the following ORDER
'' :
1 j
THE HON'BLE SRI JT'STICE. LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
WRTT PETITTON( TRt NO.6365 0F 2017
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner was paid pension and subsequently, he was expired. Therefore, cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
SD/- K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
1 Two CCs to GP For Services -1, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
2 One CC to Sri Nayakawadi Ramesh, Advocate [OPUC] 3 Two CD Copies
SA GJP
HIGTI COURT
DATED:1411212023
ORDER
t^ E STAT €
a
Pz
o
tJ 2 7 JAN 202[ i:)
* +
9i)n c\i
WP(TR).No.6365 of2017
DISMISSING THE W.P(TR)
AS TNFRUCTUOUS WITHOUTCOSTS.
@tqro</sup> (- Ger
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the cause of action for a pension claim survives the death of the petitioner.
A Venkat Swamy
State of Telangana
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
