The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 5409 of 2017 as infructuous. The petitioner challenged transfer orders regarding Gazetted Head Masters, citing violations of natural justice and transfer rules.
Writ Petition No. 5409 of 2017 dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3383 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
WRIT PETITION(TR ) NO: 5409 OF 2017
Between:
S.Kavitha, D/o S.Eshwaraiah, Aged about 37 years, Occ Gazetted Head Master Gr- ll ZPHS, Elkicherla, Bhoothpur lr/andal, Mahabubnagar District, Rl/o. H. No.7-5-1 3/c, Venkateshwara Colony, Mahabubnagar District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the impugned Proc. Rc.No.25q9lSedY-212O15 Dt.27.08.2015 of the 3rd respondent and the consequential Proc. of the 2nd respondent as illegal, Arbitrary, discriminatory, against principles of Natural Justice, Rule 14(4) and Rule 16(1)(2) of the Telangana Teachers (Regulation of Transfers) Rules, 2015 issued Vide G.O.MsNo.'12. Dt.16.06.2015, in violation of the Law Laid Down by the APEX Court including in the Judgment of the Hon'ble APEX Court in Promod K.Pankaj Vs. State of Bihar Dt.2O.11.2003 and in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of lndia and set aside the same and consequ€ntly direct the respondents to conduct re-counseling to all the Gazetted Head Masters participated in the transfer counseling held in July 20't 5.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PASULA LAXMA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION
The Court made the following: ORDER
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition no longer survives for adjudication and has become infructuous.
3 Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if aly, shall stald closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- V. HARI PRASAD ASSISTANT REqISTRAR , ,/ l-/
SECTION OFF]CER
To,
BSR \ NS
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1411212023
ORDER
WP(TR).No,5409 ot2017
STATE
N\ ],6)
-t*
:)oo [\ i[N
+
i DF.S F,I\ -\i
DrsMrsslNc THEWRIT PETITION (TR)
AS INFRUCTUOUS,
-wtTHouTcosTs
-<br>
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives for adjudication given the submission that the cause no longer survives for adjudication and has become infructuous.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Promod K. Pankaj Vs. State of BiharReferred¶15
Promod K. Pankaj Vs. State of Bihar Dt.20.11.2003
2 provisions across 2 enactments
S.Kavitha
District Educational Officer, Mahabubnagar District
Regional Joint Director of School Education, Zone-VI
Commissioner and Director of School Education, State of Telangana
State of Telangana
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
