The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition seeking implementation of the 'Catch Up Rule' to retain seniority over reserved category promotees, holding that the matter had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33E3 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTHDAYOF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICELAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
WRIT PETITIO N NO: 41898OF 2017
Between:
Mr.G. Viiay Kumar, S/oG. Ramoji, aged about 44 y rs, Occ govt servant, Rl/o H.No. 2-2-23BblG2, DMR Residency,D.D. Colony, Bagh A mberpet, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article226 of lhe constitution of lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filedtherewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order, directionor a writ particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring that theinactionon part of the respondent No.2 in considering the applicationof the petitionerfor implementationof catch Up Rule in his service, in order to enablehim to retain his seniority over reserved category promotees, in the office of the respondentNo.2, and pass any other order or orders as deemed fitand proper under the circumstances of the case, in the interest ofjustice. consequently,this Honblecourt maybe pleased to direct the respondents to implementthe GATCH UP RULE in the service of the petitioner,in order to enable himto retain his seniorityoverreservedcategory promotees,in the office of the resPondentNo.2.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2017(WPMP. NO:51962 o F 2017 )
Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstanc,-.s stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased topass an interim direction thereby directing the Respondents to consider the Petitioner as Senior Over reserved category promotes, by implementing the(IATCH UP Rule, while granting promotions, to the pots of Principal in the office of the Respondent NO. 2.
counser ror the Petition"' 'ff g[:Tmt1ililt3ror=.o
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
VTRIT PETITION NO.41898 OF 2OI7
ORDER:
Learned counsel Ms. Mohammadi Hafsa appearing for learned counsel for petitioner represents that cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.
Recording the same, Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Pending miscellaneous applications if any shall stand closed.
SD/- K.SREERAMA MU THY A,SSISTANT REGI RAR
//TRUE COPYII
SECTION FFICER
To,
0
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:1511112023
I tie SIAIA-
(
rr v
0 I 0E; ?0?3 '.g
,+
*
t 90
o i n,:tc11
ORDER
WP.No.41898 of 2017
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
@c't'8 g ?3 $
Mr. G. Vijay Kumar
The State of Telangana
The Commissioner of Technical Education
LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
