Dismissed

Union of India, rep by v. B.Krishna Murthy (died as per L.R.)

Telangana HC4 Jul 2023WP/9732/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court for Telangana heard a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal and a miscellaneous application for stay. Standing Counsel submitted the petition was infructuous due to compliance with the impugned order. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous; no order for costs; miscellaneous applications stood closed.

Union of India, rep by Vs B.Krishna… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

[³³¹⁸¹

¶3

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

¶7

wRlT PETITION NO: 9732 OF 2015

¶8

Between:

¶9

'1. Union of lndia, rep byThe Secretary, Railway Board Rail Bhavan, New Delhi. 2. The Deputy Chief Signal & Telecommunication Engineer, (Proiects) South Central Railways, Sanchalam Bhavan, Secunderabad.

¶10

...PETITIONERS

¶11

AND

¶12

B.Krishna Murthy (died as per L.R.)

¶13

Smt.B.Mangatharayamma, Wo Late B.Krishna Murthy, aged about 65 years, Occ : Housewife, Rio. Plot No.87/G, Road No.3, West Kakatiya Nagar Colony, Neredmet, Secunderabad.

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particr{ady one in I the nature of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the orfder passed in O.A.No.407 of 2O11 dt.05.07.2013 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad and to quash the'same, as being illegal, arbitrary and uniust.

¶16

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 12807 OF 2015)

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the H(;h Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order passed in O.A.No.407 of 2O11 d1.05.07.2O13 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. ANJALI AGARWAL Counsel for the Respondents: None Appeared The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVTLI AND

¶20

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJDSHWAR RAO

¶21

MIT PETITION No.9732 of 2O15

¶22

ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Jusrice Abhtnand Kumar Shauili)

¶23

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing lor the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have complied with the order dated 05.07.2013 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad in O.A.No.407 of 2Ol1 and therefore, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

¶24

Recording the above submission, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous Thcre shall be no order as to costs

¶25

As a sequel, miscellar-reous applications pending, if

¶26

any, in this Writ Petition, shalt stand closecl.

¶27

SD/.A.V.S.PRASAD ASSISTANIREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// (zr> SECTISN OFFICER

¶28

¶29

To,

¶30

The Union of lndia, Secretary, Railway^{Board Rail Bhavan, New Delhi.} 2. The Deputy Chief Signal &^{TelecommunicationEngineer, (Proiects) South} Central Railways, Sanchalam^{Bhavan, Secunderabad.}

¶31

One CC to M/s. ANJALI AGARWAL,^Advocate [OPUC]

¶32

Two CD Copies BM GJP Q/

{ {

HIGH COURT

DATED:0410712023

ORDER

1ELA
:) v
.9
t.a
)
=s
) G,
<br>'Hrt'.

¶38

WP.No.9732 of 2015

¶39

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS

¶40

v
t"
F-

Union of India, rep by v. B.Krishna Murthy (died as per L.R.)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Union of India, rep by v. B.Krishna Murthy (died as per L.R.)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.P. Transco Vs Uma Devi Bethini

K M v S Kumar Vs Union of India,Scy,Finance,New Delhi,and 2

The Union of India, Vs Chattar Singh

Smt. P. Sumitra Vs Union of India Ministry of Railways and 2 Others

The Government of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Vs Pittala Srinivas

K. Babulal, Hyderabad Vs Secy, Msme, New Delhi and 3 Others