Writ petition challenging a transfer order and tribunal order regarding temporary transfer was dismissed as having become infructuous.
None. Writ petition dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
[3318 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 23821 OF 2016
Between:
K. Babulal, S/o Narsoji, aged about 57 years, Occ: Working as Engineer Grade-lll, Central lnstitute of Tool Design (LCA) Department, CITD, Balanagar, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of 'Writ of Certiorari' calling for the records relating to the order dated 9-06-2016 passed in O.A.No.021 1135912014 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench and set aside the same as unjust, without any basis and contrary to law and including the order No.CITD/E-1(1 27)181 daled 17-11-2014 issued by the 3rd respondent subjecting the petitioner temporarily transferred to chennai, as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and contrary to Article 14 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner at CITD, Hyderabad till his retirement during July,2O17
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016 (WPMP. NO 293420F 20161
Petitron under section 151 opc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay the order dated 9-06-2016 passed in o.A.No.021/13 sltl2oi4 by the central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabacl Bench rncluding the order No.clrD/ E'1(127)lB1 dated 17-'l 1-2014 issued by the 3rd respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D. RAMAKRISHNA
Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI GAD| PRAVEEN KUMAR,
DY. SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWARRAO
WRIT PETITION No.23821 of 2016
ORDER:(Per the Hon'ble Si Justice AbhrnondKwnarShauili)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has informed the Court
that the writ petition has becomc infructuous.
infructuous. There shall be no order as tocosts.
any, in this Writ Petition,shall stand closed
SD/- K. VENKAIAH ASSTSTAHE::'-T:: I SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, '1. One CC to SRI D. RAMAKRTSHNA, Advocate tOpUCl 2. ONE CC tO SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUIUAR, OEFUTi SbLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA TOPUCI 3. Two CD Cboies BN/ cJPc/
HIGH COURT
DATED:0410712023
ORDER
WP.No.23821 of 2016
Fir.i;-'----.,..,<br>i, / .:
t1 JUI 2m . li
,).
.. r ^ .. '' 1/'
i.--- --
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
v7
K. Babulal
Union of India
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
