Writ petition challenging removal from service and denial of back wages by APSRTC and Labour Court dismissed as infructuous due to efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
<br>
I
ltrl I rl il
[3301 I
H o, tJURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Origina{ Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE r1
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
I raiRtr pertnoN No: 9405 oF 2014
Between:
I
A.K.Reddy, S/o. undar Reddy, aged about 49 years, driver, APSRTC, E.No.280162, Wanaparthy Bus Depot, R/o. H.No.2-'15, Rayannapet Village, Kothakota Mand [,4ahabunna ga r Drstrict
,..PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying thatin the circumstances stated I in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Courtmaybe pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring lthe action of 3rdrespondentin removedthe petitioner from service and con'sefiuential order of the 1"trespondentin l.D.No.30/2010 dated 13-9-20'12 which vVas issued in G.O.Rt.No.1283dated14-11-2012 as illegal, arbitrary, d isproportiodatb and set asidethe same so far as relief in not giving the back wages with all attendance benefits and consequentlydirect the respondents to award with full back wages, all attendance benefitswhich is attachedto the post forthwith.
Counsel for the PetitionLr: SRI VENKATESWERLLU KESAMSETTY c*\
Counsel for the Respondentf THoOMsRlNlvAS (SC FOR TSRTC)
The Court made the following: ORDER
,
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE PULLAKARTHIK
WRIT PETITIONNo.94O5OF 2OL4
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is fi1ed seekir-rgto declare the acLion of the 3'd respondent inremovingthe petitioner from service and the consequential order of thelstrespondent in I.D.No.3Ool 2O1O,dated13 09 2012, which was published in G.O.Rt.No.1283,datcd 14.11.2O12, as illegal and arbitrary andset aside the same
Miscellaneous applications, iI any,pending inthis writ petition,
shall stand closed. No costs.
SD/- MOHD. SANAULLAH AI'ISAR| ASSISTANT REGIPTRAR 's //rRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To, 21 One CC One CC to toSriSriThobm Srinivas CI kateswerllu(SC KesamsettY,FOR TS RTC) Advocate TOPUCI[OPUC] 3 Two CD CoPies TJ GJP 6
6 ll
f
HIGH COURT
DATED:111101223
I i I I
I
I
ORDER I I
WP.No.9405 ofI 2014I
.1 :iTATE
2
!.<
J
!,J I E l{0\l ?$8
*
.ll .. r-a cr.
DISMISSING THE WRITPETITON
AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS.
A.K. Reddy
The Chairman Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court-III, Hyderabad
The Vice-Chairman & Managing Director, APSRTC
The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Gadwal Bus Depot
PULLA KARTHIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
