Disposed

Kunja Kannappa and 26 others v. The State of Telangana and 11 others

Telangana HC22 Dec 2023WP/8993/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners, claiming tribal possession of patta lands, challenged issuance of 1-B (ROR) to non-tribal respondents. The Court held petitioners are encroachers lacking title and thus generally lack locus standi in mutation matters. However, acknowledging prima facie possession over specific admeasuring land, the Court made an interim order absolute to protect possession.

What did the court decide?

Interim order dated 24.06.2020 made absolute; respondents directed not to interfere with petitioners' possession; other reliefs rejected.

Kunja Kannappa and 26 others Vs The State of Telangana… — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^318s ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT^FOR THE^{STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF^DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN^REDDY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 8993 OF 2020

¶7

Between:

¶8

1, Kunja Kannappa, S/o. Pedda Venkappa Age:^{58 yrs, occ: Agriculture,}

¶9

Naram Gangulu, S/o. Nagulu,^{(Died as per LRs Petitioner Nos.28to 32)}

¶10

Kunja Jogappa, S/o. China^{Ramudu Age. 43 yrs, occ. Agricullure,}

¶11

Kunja Laxmudu, S/o- China^{Ramudu Age. 43 yrs,occ. Agriculture,}

¶12

Kunla Rajulu, S/o. Venkappa Age.^{50 yrs, occ. Agriculture,}

¶13

Madi Papaao, S/o.^{Marappa Age. 36 yrs, Occ. Agriculture,}

¶14

Ganapa Veeranna, S/o. Brahmayya Age. 73^{yrs, occ. Agriculture,}

¶15

Kunja Mangaraju, S/o. Venkappa^{Age. 26 yrs, occ. Agriculture,}

¶16

Naram Venkateswar Rao, S/o.^{Gangulu Age. 36 yrs, occ. Agriculture,} 10 Sodem Nageswar Rao, S/o. Kannappa^{Age. 38 yrs, occ. Agriculture,} 11. Sodem Ramudu, S/o. Kannappa. Age. 53yrs, occ.^Agriculture, 12 Kunla Rammurthy, S/o. Laxmudu Age. 53^{yrs, occ. Agriculture,} '13. Kunja Hanumanthu, S/o. Laxmudu Age. 43 yrs, occ. Agriculture, 14 Naram Laxmi. wo. Laxmalah Age. 51^yrs, occ. Agriculture, 1 5 Naram Laxmaiah, S/o. Nagulu Age. 58^yrs, occ. Agriculture, 16 Kunja Durga Rao, S/o. Peda Venkappa Age. 43^yrs, occ- Agriculture, 1 7 lvladi Marappa, S/o. Paparao Age. 68^yrs, occ. Agriculture,

¶17

'18. Kunja Laxmudu, S/o. Peda Venkappa Age. 53 yrs, occ. Agriculture, 19 Korsa Venkatesh, S/o. Krishna Murthy Age. 38 yrs, occ. Agriculture, 20. Kunja Ramudu, S/o. Peda Venkappa Age. 43^yrs, occ. Agriculture.

¶18

2'1 Kunla Parvathi, W/o. Sankuraiah Age. 46 yrs, occ. Agriculture, 22. Sodem Sankaraiah, S/o, Kannappa Age. 46 yrs, occ. Agriculture, 23. Sodern Somamma, W/o. Shankaraiah Age. 45 Yrs, occ. Agriculture, z4.Kotsa Muthyal Rao, S/o. Krishnaiah Age. 38 yrs, occ. Agriculture, 25.Kurya Muthyalu, S/o. China RanuJlu Age. 53 yrs, occ. Agriculture, 26. Korsa Singaramma, W/o. Laxmudu Age. Sg yrs, occ. Agriculture,

¶19

All are residents of Vagoddugudem, Utlapally Village, Aswaraopet Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District

¶20

2T.Udathaneni Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Suryaprakash Rao Age: 58 Yrs, occ: Agriculture, Aswaraopet Village and tr,landal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶21

Naram Govindhamma Wo. Late Naram Gangula, aged 57^years, Occ: House wife, R/o. Vagoddugudem, Utlapally Village, Aswaraopet Mandal, Bhadradri Kolhagudem District.

¶22

Naram Mahalaxmi, D/o. Late Naram Gangula Aged 40^years, Occ: Housewife R/o. Vagoddugudem, Utlapally Village Aswaraopet Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem Drstrict.

¶23

Unumula Krishna Veni W/o. Unumula Buchiraju, D/o. Late Naram Gangulu aged 32 years, Occ: House wife, R/o. Vagoddugudem, Utlapally Village, Aswaraopet lvlandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶24

31.Katam Nagamani D/o. Late Naram Gangula, aged 32^years, Occ:^{House wife,} Rt/o. Vagoddugudem, Utlapally Village, Aswaraopet Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶25

32.Naram Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Late Naram Gangula, aged 39^years,Occ: Business, Ryo. Vagoddugudem, Utlapally Village, Aswaraopet Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District

¶26

Petitioner Nos. 28 to 32 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased Petitioner No.2 as^per C.O. dated^{22.12.2023in lA No.1/2023.}

¶27

...PETITIONERS

¶28

AND

¶29

1 The State of Telangana, Rep by^{its Principal} Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶30

2 The District Collector, Bhadradri Kothagudem District at Kottagudem.

¶31

3 The Revenue Divisional Offrcer, Kothagudem Revenue Division, Bhadradri Kothagudem Distnct

¶32

4 Tahsildar, Aswaraopet, Aswaraopet lr,,landal. Bhadradri Kothagudem District

¶33

5 Project officercum Add. Agent to Government, ITDA, Bhadrachalam, Bhad rad ri-Kotha^g u d e m District.

¶34

6 The Village Revenue Officer, Aswaraopeta Village and Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District

¶35

7 Patan Akbar Khan,^{S/o. Abdulla Khan Age 60 years, Occ. RMP Doctor} Tyaganpudi Vrllage, Devarapalli^{Mandal, West Godavari District, Andhra} Pradesh.

¶36

8 Mohammed Karimulla, S/o^{UsmanAge48 years,Occ. Lorry Mechanic} Vijayawada Town.^{Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh}

¶37

I Mohammed Asrf , S/o^{Usman Age44 yearc, Occ. Auto Driver Vijayawada} Town, Krishna Drstnct,^{Andhra Pradesh}

¶38

Mohammed Yakub Alr, S/o. Yousuf^{Age. 60 years, Occ. Tailor} Aswaraopet Village and Mandal, Bhadradri Kotlragudenr District

¶39

I i.l I ii

¶40

/ -v

¶41

"W:i''ff !?'3i"''"n'"''

¶42

"HS,issil?3:S,1[H,[i39ft^{:U[*'s;,iir',1,'f,} Andhra^Pradesh.

¶43

1. Makdum^{Mahmad,S/o' HassansahebAge.p] years' 4-175' Aswaraopet} ":?!:f '' Ulffi & rvlnoar,'anro,,dri Kothagudem District'

¶44

...RESPONDENTS

¶45

Petition under^{Atlicle226 of the Constitution} .of^{lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances^{statedin tnJiirii"it-rir"dtherewith' the High Court maybe} pleased to issue^{a writ, oroei oi oit""tio"more particu-larlyin the nature of writ of} mandamus declaring^{,n" ,"ilJn oi tnl |."rpono'"nt.officials more particularly4th} respondent^{Tahsildari,"'ni"ia-nOnin favourof the respondent Nos T to 11} without following^{the due Jr.o""tt-of law in accordancewith law even after} oending^{the WP No. 8646 ;;;O'Ofor the respondents counteris beingillegal} ;#;;;"^{anioviotationot u|.t"rtr a' zi or consiitutionof lndia and also violation} of orinciples^{of natural} i"t'""u""ni'-nsequently^{dire-ctthe respondent2 to 3 to} ;J;ff;; op"rrt,on'"r^{rb"ion gi'"t"0 nv-tnu 4th respondentin favour or} respondents^{7 to 12 forthwith}

¶46

IA NO:¹ 0F²⁰²⁰

¶47

Petition under^{Sectlon151CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit^{filed rn supportJi tnu p"iition'Ine Hign Court may be pleased to} direct^{respondents2 to 3 to t'""Jtie operation.oi 1B-ROR granted by the 4th} 7 r<,'12 lot the^{landsi'e' in Sv No 806 to} respondent^{in lavour .t t"t;;;;;;;} 836 to an extent^{o[ r , z 2., grniu; situated in VagoddugudemH/o. Aswaraopeta} Village and^{Mandal' en,o"ii';ioin;g'd",.. oitt'iltforthwith'pending disposal of} the writ Petition.

¶48

IA NO :1O^{F 2021}

¶49

Between

¶50

1 PatanAkbarKhan,S/o.AbdullaKhanAge'60years'Occ.RMPDoctoriii?r"i,r",i'viir;gL^{-olr",.,pttltr'tanoatJwestGodavari District' Andhra} Pradesh

¶51

2 tt4ohammedKarimulla'S/o.UsmanAge43years'.OccLorryMechanic V;;:;;;; iJ*". x".t ", Distnct,^{Andhra Pradesh}

¶52

3 N,4ohan'rmed Asif,^{S/o. Usman Age. 44 years' Occ Auto Driver Vijayawada} iJwn krisnna^{Distnct' Andhra Pradesh'}

¶53

4 Mohammed^{Yakub Ali, S/o. Yousuf Age} .60 Lears'^{Occ Tailor Aswaraopet} vttage ano Mandal^{Bhadradri Kothagudemulstrrct'}

¶54

5 il;r;;;;i;, Mohammed^{R;ramkota Azimunnrsa vir15ge, Begum veleruuoadu W/o. AbdulSattar Mandai' West Godavari District'Ag9,.61 y9a'9' Og".} . Anclhra Pradesh.

¶55

. ..VACATE^{PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTSNos'7to1 1}

¶56

I I I I i I I I Ii t I

¶57

¶58

AND

¶59

Kunja Kannappa,^{S/o. Pedda VenkappaAge: 58 yrs, occ: Agriculture'}

¶60

Naram^{Gangulu,S/o. Nagulu,(Oied as per LRs Petitioner Nos' 28 to 32)}

¶61

Kunja Jogappa,^{S/o. China RamuduAge43 yrs, occ. Agriculture'}

¶62

Kunia Laxmudu,^{S/o China RamuduAge43 yrs, occ Agriculture'}

¶63

Kunja Rajulu,^{S/o. VenkappaAge. 50 yrs, occ'Agriculture'}

¶64

Madi Paparao,^{S/o. Marappa Age. 36 yrs, Occ' Agriculture'}

¶65

GanapaVeeranna,^{S/o. BrahmayyaAge. 73 yrs, occ Agriculture'}

¶66

Kunja {r,langaraju,^{S/o. Venkappa Age. 26 yrs' occ' Agriculture'}

¶67

Naram^{VenkateswarRao' S/o GanguluAge36 yrs, occ Agriculture'}

¶68

10.Sodem^{Nageswar Rao, S/o. KannappaAge 38 yrs, occ Agriculture'}

¶69

11.Sodem Ramudu,^{S/o. Kannappa.Age 53yrs, occ Agriculture'}

¶70

Kunja Rammurthy,^{S/o. LaxmuduAge. 53 yrs' occ Agriculture,}

¶71

13.Kunja Hanumanthu,^{S/o LaxmuduAge 43 yrs, occ Agriculture'}

¶72

Naram Laxmi, Wo.^{LaxmalahAge 5l yrs, occ Agriculture'}

¶73

Naram Laxmaiah,^{S/o. NaguluAge58 yrs occ'Agriculture'}

¶74

16.Kunja Durga^{Rao, S/o. Peda VenkappaAge' 43 yrs,occ Agriculture'}

¶75

Madi Marappa,^{S/o. Paparao Age. 68 yrs, occ Agriculture'}

¶76

18.Kunja Laxmudu,^{S/o. Peda VenkappaAge53 yrs,occ Agriculture'}

¶77

19.Korsa Venkatesh,^{S/o. Krishna Murthy Age'38 yrs, occ Agriculture'}

¶78

20.Kunja Ramudu,^{S/o. Peda VenkappaAge43 yrs,occ'Agriculture'}

¶79

Kunja Parvathi,^{W/o. SankuraiahAge'46 yrs, occ' Agriculture'}

¶80

22.Sodem Sankaraiah,^{S/o, KannappaAge 46 yrs' occ Agriculture'}

¶81

Sodem Somamma,^{W/o. ShankararahAge45 Yrs, occ Agriculture'}

¶82

24.Korsa Muthyal^{Rao,S/o KrishnaiahAge38 Yrs, occ Agriculture'}

¶83

Kunja^{Muthyalu,S/o China Ramulu Age 53 Yrs'occ'Agriculture'}

¶84

Korsa Singaramma,^{W/o. LaxnruduAge. 58 Yrs, occ'Agriculture,}

¶85

AllareresidentsofVagoddugudem,UtlapallyVillage,AswaraopetMandal' Bhadradri Kothagudem^District

¶86

2T.Udathaneni Srinivasa^{Rao, Sio SuryaprakashRq9.Age: 58 Yrs, occ:}

¶87

Agiicutture, Aswaraopet vrllage and lrrlandat, Bhadradri Kothagudem uistnct.

¶88

Naram Govindhamma^{W/o Late NaramGangula' aged 57 years, O99: House} wife, R/o. Vagoddugudem,^{UtlapallyVillage'Aswaraopet Mandal,Hnaoraorl} Kothagudem District.

¶89

Naram Mahalaxmi,^{D/o.Lale Naram GangulaAged 40 years, Occ: Housewife} R/o. Vagoddugudem, Utlapally^{Village, Aswaraopet Mandal, unaoraorl} Kothagudem District.

¶90

Unumula Krishna Venr^{W/o.Unumula Buchiraju,D/o. Late NaramGangulu} aged 32 years, Occ House wife,^{R/o. Vagoddugudem,Utlapally Village,} A-waraopet Mandal. Bhadradri Kothagudem^Distrrct.

¶91

¶92

t { i i

¶93

Katam^{NagamaniD/o Late Naram Gangula'} "aged^{32.y-earsOcc: House wife'} R/o. vaqodduguoem,^{utiapliiv"rIii"ri"'-'ni*"raop'etMandal'Bhadradri} Kothagudem^District.

¶94

32.Naram^{Venkateswara Rao, S/o' Late Naram Gangula'a999r39rlF'i'\i;3OT:} "' Hil;;;.;, Fvo^- vagoddugudem, utlapallv village' Bhadradri^{KothagudemDistrrct'}

¶95

;";o.", ry"e^ia {pzo:[.%:tL]f1,lffil.,iir!I'^{or the deceased} Petitioner^{No'2as per c'o'}

¶96

...RESpoNDENTSMRIT^PETITI.NERS

¶97

1 The State^{of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department'} Secretariat,^HYderabad.

¶98

2 TheDiStrictcollector,BhadradriKothagudemDistrictatKottagudem.

¶99

3 The Revenue^{Divisional Officer, Kothagudem RevenueDivision' Bhadradri} Kothagudem^District

¶100

¶101

Tahsildar,^{Aswaraopet' Aswaraopettvlandal'Bhadradri Kothagudem District}

¶102

5 Proiect of ficer-cum-Add.^{Agent to Government' ITDA'Bhadrachalam'} Bhddradri-Kothagudem^District'

¶103

6 The Village^{Revenue Officer, Aswaraopeta Villageand Mandal' Bhadradri} Kothagudem^District

¶104

7 MakdumMahmad,S/o-HassansahebAge63years,4.175'Aswaraopet Vliiig;'&'Ml;il.^{Bnaoraori Kothagudem District}

¶105

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶106

Petition under^{Section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated} in the affidavit^{filed in support Ji tn" p"iition' irre Hign.Court may be pleased to} vacate the^{interim orderor,"o ia ot:020passed in t.R. No.tlzoz0 in wP No'} 8993 of^2020.

¶107

Counsel^{for the Petitioners:SRI SANNIDHIRAJA MALLESWARARAO}

¶108

Counsel for^{the Respondent No'1 to 6: GP FOR REVENUE}

¶109

counserfor^{the RespondentNo T t tt'} P3'"i$t'J^$'tBiI"Bh"ro='NrT'

¶110

Counsel^{for the Respondent No 12: - - - -}

¶111

The Court^{made the following:OROER}

¶112

4 l I I

¶113

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶114

WRIT PETI TION No.8993 0F 2020

¶115

ORDER: (ORAL)

¶116

This writ petition is filed by the petitioners seeking to declare action of respondent No.4 - Tahsildar, Aswaraopet Mandal, in issuing l-B (ROR) in favour of respondent Nos.7 to I I without following due process o[ law and even dunng the pendency of the W.P. No.8646 of 2020,as being illegal and arbirrary.

¶117

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners belong to Scheduled Tnbe, Koya Communirv and they are downtrodden people. They are residents of Vagoddugudem FUo. Aswaraopet Village and Mandal, Bhadradri_Kothagudem District, which falls under scheduled area. petrtioncrs are in possession of the small extents o[ land and they are eaking Iivelihood by doing cultivation since long time. Responrlent Nos.2 to 5 have issued possession certificates confirming the possession of the petitioners over the subject lands. tt is stated rhat when the petitioners approached respondent No.4 and rcqucsted for confirming their possession, they came to know that rcspondent

¶118

¶119

Nos.3 and 4 have colluded with unofficial respondents and asserted that petitioners were never in possession and cultivation of the subject lands.

¶120

. It is submitted that compact area of the pafta lands in Vagoddugudem H/o. Aswaraopeta Village consists of thirty three (33) Survey numbers with an exrent of Acs.l46_29 guntas. The land to an extent ofAcs. 146_29 guntasin Survey Nos.799 to g07, 809 to 836 and g4l srands patta in the name of non_tribars (minorities). out of thirty three (33) Survey numbers, the names of non-tribals are recorded in seventeen ( I 7) Survey numbers in full and eleven (l l) Survey numbers in parr admeasuring Acs.l lT_ 2l guntas which is under the occupation of tribals who are doing horticulture and agricu I ture.

¶121

4' It is submitted that respondent Nos.J and 4 in active collusion with the unofl.icial respondents are making attempts to issue fresh pattadar passbooks and title deeds in favour of unofficial respondents and thereby to deprive the legal rights of the petitioners. The petitioners came to know that respondent No.4 in collusion with the unoflicial respondenrs got issued I_B (ROR) in

¶122

)

¶123

¶124

favour of unofficial respondents without following due process of law, ignoring the possession of the petitioners for a long period of time. W.P. No.8646 of 2020 was filed by the petitioners seeking respondent authorities therein not to issue any fresh pattadar passbooks and title deeds in favour of unolficial respondents in respect of the land admeasuring Acs.l 17-21 guntas in Survey Nos.806 to 836 situated at Vagoddugudem Vitlage. It is contended that despite pendency of the writ petition, respondent Nos.l and 4 illegally issued 1-B (ROR) to respondent Nos.7 to 12. Thus, action of respondents more particularly respondent No.4 is liable to declared as arbitrary and in violation of principles of narural Justlce.

¶125

Interim order dated 24.06.2020 was passerl by this Court which reads as under:

¶126

"Notice before admissron.

¶127

The leamed Government Pleader for Revenue takes notice on behalf of respondent Nos.l to 6.

¶128

Leamed counsel for the petitioners is directed to take out personal notice to respondent Nos.7 to l2 and file proofof service in the Registry.

¶129

Post on 22.07 .2020.

¶130

¶131

Meanwhile, the possession of the petitioners' shall not be disturbed."

¶132

Mr. Mummineni Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are in possession of the subject lands and the 1B - ROR issued in fdvour of unofficiat respondents is in violation of principles of natural justice.

¶133

Mr. B. Mayur Reddy, leamed Senior Counsel appearing for Mr. G.Ravi Chandra Sekhar, leamed counsel lor respondent Nos.7 to ll, submitted that petitioners do not have any locus-standi to institute this writ petition. Leamed Senior Counsel has pointed out that even as per the admitted case of the petitioners, the subject lands are patta lands. He placed reliance on rhe lerter addressed by respondent No.4 to respondenr No.2 vide Lr.No.B/663/92 dated 19.10.2000 where in it was srared that the lands situated in Vagoddugudem FVo. Aswaraopeta Village are patta lands.

¶134

It is not in dispute that petitioners are not having any title to the subject pafta lands, and as evident lrom the report of the Tahsildar dated 19.10.2000. Petitioners have occupied pafta lands. By taking into consideration their long standing possession and

¶135

¶136

¶137

cultivation and possible law and order problem and also tension between the tribals and non+ribals, the Tahsildar requested the District Collector, Khammam District to issue clarification for taking.further action by proceedings dated 19. 10.2000.

¶138

I have perused the report ofthe Tahsildar dared 19. 10.2000. As seen from the said report, the Tahsildar was of the opinion that the subject lands are situated in Scheduled area. He enrertained a doubt whether lands in the non Scheduled Area can be purchased by the Project Officer, ITDA, Bhadrachalam, for the benefit ol tribals and thus requested the District Collector tu issue clarification fbr taking further action.

¶139

Leamed Senior Counsel for respondent Nos.7 to lt contended that there is no disprite whatsoever that subjecr lands are non-schedule area lands, and had been recorded patta in the names of non-tribals (minorities) and they are none other than the un-o ttlcial respondents herein.

¶140

In the opinion of this Court, petitioners who appear ro be encroachers ol the lands in question which are patta [ands as per

¶141

¶142

the report ofthe Tahsildar dated 19.10.2000 do not have any locus standi to challenge the mutation proceedings or I-B^(ROR) issued in favour of unofficial respondents.

¶143

I l. However, this Court takes note of the findings given by the Tahsildar in his report dated 19.10.2000. In the said report it is stated that approximately Acs.l l7-21 guntas in the above referred Survey numbers is in possession of the tribals. Thus, Prima facie, petitioners are in possession ofthe subject lands

¶144

In view of the above, interim order dated24.06.2020^passed is made absolute. Respondents are directed not to interfere^with the possession of the petitioners without lollowing due^process of law. In so far as the other relief/s sought lor in the^writ petition^is concemed, it is rejected. Both the parties are at liberty to invoke appropriate legal remedies by approaching the concemed authorities for issuance of pattalmutation/possessors rights etc.^as the case may be.

¶145

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shatt be

¶146

no order as to costs.

t.,

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications,

¶152

iIany, pending in the writ petition stand closed.

¶153

¶154

"o^*o"o.tM'ttt#ottfsT t/rRUE coPY// - sEcrtoN M'tt

¶155

To, '1. The Principal Secretary Revenue Department, The^{Stateof Telangana'} Secretariat,^Hyderabad.

¶156

z in" oliiri"i^{C6ttector, Bhadradri KothagudemDistrict atf(ottiagudem.} S iii; R";;;;-ori.,oi^{it officer,Kotha{udemRevenue Division, Bhadradri}

¶157

Kothaoudem District

¶158

4 i;;;;E;i;.waiiopet.^{Aswaraopet Mandal, Bhld-Jadri Kothagudem District} s^ploi!"r orri"Jr-irm^{hoa.Agentt<i Government, ITDA, Bhadrachalam'}

¶159

B hddradri-Kothag^{ud em District}

¶160

inJlirrige^{RLuEni"Onicet, Aswaraopeta Villageand Mandal, Bhadradri} Kothaaudem District.

¶161

z oi"'t'Ci" snr sAr.rr.rroHrnnJA^{MALLESWARARAq,Advoqate[oPUC]} 8 i;; Cat t-GP^{FORREVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana.} Iourl

9 Two CD Copres

BN c BS

HIGH COURT

DATED:2211212023

ORDER

WP.No.8993 of 2020

e STArt oA'
( +
7
18 ![q 2$?t a
oo
j*
*
t
DESPAlC

¶169

DISPOS!NG OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶170

\6\

¶171

"oL

Kunja Kannappa and 26 others v. The State of Telangana and 11 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kunja Kannappa and 26 others v. The State of Telangana and 11 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dappu Radhika Vs The State of Telangana

Narla Ramchander Vs The State of Telangana

Smt Manuka Mallamma Vs The State of Telangana

Sri Yadla Satish Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Smt Kadakanchi Chinna Somakka Vs The State of Telangana

Alle Shankar Vs The State of Telangana