The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition filed in 2009, which was brought before them in December 2023. The court held that the petition was infructuous due to the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33s3 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND
THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMARJUKANTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 8958 OF 2009
Between:
Enugu Venkata Reddy, S/o. GangaReddy, aged 43 years,Ogc:Agricultureand MPTC lvlancherial, r/o. Rapalle Village,I\tlancheriallVlandal, Adilabad District.
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of theConstitution of lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or directionmore particularly onein the nature of writ of lVlandamus.declaring the action of the respondents in not conductingpublic auctionfor grant of lease hold rights to quarry sand from Namnoor Sand from NamnoorVillage, lvlancherial tvlandal, Adilabad District, and
contemplating to issue temporarypermits wtthout there beinggroundwater report (3) denying the proportionate sharepayable to thelocal bodiesin terms of G.O.Ms.No.255 Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department dated02-08- 2001 as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, Colourable exercise ofpower, oppose topublic interest, deprivation of the right accrued to local bodies under the constitution, violtive of the procedure contemplated under the AP [\ilinor ]vlineral Concession Rules, 1966, violative of the procedure contemplated under the AP Water, Land and Tress act and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 not to issue temporary permits and conduct public auctions.
|.A.NO:1 OF 2009(W PMP.NO: 11716 OF 2009)
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondents 1 to 4 not to issue temporary permits to quarry sand from Namnoor Sand Reach, Mancherial Mandal, Adilabad District, without there being ground water report, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI ANURAJ COTIPALLY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI C.V.R.RUDRA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY
The Court made the following ORDER
THE HoN' BLE THE CTITEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HoN'BLE SHRTJUsTrco aNIL KUMARJUKANTI
WRIT PETITION No.8958 oF 2009
ORDER. 6,"r r he Hon'bte the Chief Jusrice Alctk Aratthe)
Mr. Anuraj Cotipally, leamed counsel, appearing on behalf of Mr. C.V.R.Rudra prasad, leamed counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration on account of efflux ol time.
2 In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is
dismissed as infructuous There shall be no order as to costs
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand
closed.
S D/-MOHD.SANAULLAHANSARI ASSISTANT REGIS R
//TRUE COPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
To
SA BS w--
HIGH COURT
DATED:1411212023
ORDER
WP.No.8958 of 2009
'::.
7-0?:
, l.j f-it tjil
t, .-.
, ,:,'
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFITUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
6c{rQ6 w- {r#
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Enugu Venkata Reddy
Government of Andhra Pradesh
The Director, Mines & Geology Department
The District Level Committee for Sand Auctions
The Asst. Director, Mines and Geology Department
S. Thirupati Reddy
Alok Aradhe
Anil Kumar Jukanti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
