Disposed

Jaya Vankdoth v. The State of Telangana and 5 Others

Telangana HC10 Nov 2023WP/8381/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, a teacher, filed writ and connected applications challenging posting orders due to alleged illegality regarding her spouse's appeal. The court allowed liberty to challenge a memo rejecting her appeal and closed the writ petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to challenge the rejected appeal memo; Writ Petition closed; No order on costs.

Jaya Vankdoth Vs The State of Telangana and 5 Others — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^321e ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE.SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI^DEVI

¶6

wRIT PETITION NO: 8381 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

Jaya Vankdoth, Wo Daravath Ramesh,^Aged QJ .y_ears,.^Occ. 9econdary Grbde Teacher, Ri./o H.No.^4-66/1 ,^{Alya Thanda, UsirikayalapalleKhammam} District'

¶9

...PETrroNER

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, rep by Chief Secretary,^{Secretariat,Hyderabad.}

¶12

The Principal Secretary, School^{Education, Secretariat,Hyderabad}

¶13

3- The District Collector, Khammam^{District, Khammam.}

¶14

The District Collector, Bhadradri^{Kothagudem District, Kothagudem}

¶15

The District Educational Officer,^{Khammam District, Khammam}

¶16

The District Educational Officer,^{Bhadradri KothagudemDistrict,Kothagudem}

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the^{Constitutionof lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court may be} pleased to pass an order or direction or writⁱⁿ the^{nature of mandamus duly} declaring the action of the^{6th respondentin issuing the posting ordersin Proc.} No. ES/SC/BHAD/SEGR/OO40^{dated07.01 .2022 postingMPPS Nakiri Peta,} Burgampahad, Bhadradri Kothagudem^{District, withoutconsideringher spouse} appeal case as illegal, arbitrary^{and againstthe principlesof natural justice and} consequently, direct the^{respondents to set aside the posting ordersin Proc. No.} ES/SC/BHAD/SEGFyO04O^{dated 07.01.2022and retainat the present place in the} interest of^justice.

¶19

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the pelition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the posting orders in Proc. No. ES/SC/BHAD/SEGR/0040 dated 07.O1.2022, in the interest of justice.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.RAMA SHARANA SHARMA Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR SERVTCES-I

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.MADHAVT DEVI

¶24

WRIT PETITION N0.8381 of2022

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:

¶27

'.-.to po.ss an order ol duectia or wnt in the nature of mandamus dulg decta.ing the actrcn of the 6th respondenr h rssuing the posting orderc in proc No. ES/ SC/ BHAD/ SECR/ 0040 dated O7.O1.2022 posting MppS No,kin peta Burganpahctd Bhadradri Kothagudem Drstict wittlout consideing her spouse appeal case as legal arbtrary aad agalnst the principLes of naturalystice anrl coasequentlg dtect the respondetlts to set aside the posttagorders iL Fyoc.No_ ES,/SC,/ BHAD/ SEGR/OO4O dated O7.O1_2022 and retain at the present place in tte Lnterest ofltstice and ropass_.. "

¶28

Learned Government Pleader for Services-l appearing for respondents submitted that as per the directions of this Court dated 16.02.2022, the respondents have considered the appeal of the petitioner dated 24.12.2021 and have rejected the same uid.e memo dated 08.04.2022. A copy of the memo dated Og.04.2O22 is placed before this Court.

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks iiberty to challenge the same.

¶30

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed with liberty as prayed

¶31

for. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶32

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also stand

¶33

closed

¶34

/ffRUE COPY//

¶35

SD/. P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR .1. -- ' SECTIO](fOFFICER

¶36

¶37

1 One CC to SRI P.RAMA SHARANA SHARMA, Advocate [OPUC] 2 Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES-|, High Court forthe State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies PSK. GJP

HIGH COURT

DATED:1011112023

ORDER

WP.No.8381 of 2022

./:rt\ f, STAIE
6"
't B 0Es 821 a
o
,+
*
(.c
-lr
E S PA1 C

¶43

CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION

¶44

WITHOUT COSTS.

Jaya Vankdoth v. The State of Telangana and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jaya Vankdoth v. The State of Telangana and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

E.Narsimha Reddy Vs Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd. of T.S

Matcha Kumar Vs The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.

A.Veereshalingam Vs The Singareni Colleries Company Ltd.

P. Jayaprada Vs Sri Dr. Suseender Rao

K. Janardhan Vs Sri Rahul Bojja, I.A.S.

S.Narender Reddy Vs Smt.Vakati Karuna, I.A.S.