Petitioner, a retired employee, filed a writ petition for pension benefits on behalf of which an intervening petition for interim relief was also filed. The court dismissed both petitions as withdrawn by the petitioner.
Permission to withdraw was accorded; the writ petition and connected petition were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[321e I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO: 33622 OF 2021
Between:
A.Veereshalingam, S/o A.Shankerlingam, Aged about 61 years, Occ. Retd. Employee, Rl/o Ankoor, Saidapur, Karimnagar District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ot lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to admit me into the pension scheme, by declaring the action of the respondents, in not considering the representation of the petitioner, to admit him into thepension scheme, as bad in law.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to consider the representation of thepetitioner dated 24.03.2021, to admit himinto the pension scheme, pending disposal of the above writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GURRAM SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SCFOR SINGARENI COLLIERIES CO.LTD
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLESMT. JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITIONNo.33622of 202t
ORDER:
has frledletter Learnedcounsel for thepetlttoner
dated 08.11.2023, statingas under:-
'The aforesaidW.P.No 33622 of 2021'filed bg mg client Si VeereshaLingam,Luho is o retired employeeof SingareniCollenesCompangLtd' 'for the purposeof ,oi.t onof Pension and other retirementbeneftts 'No'''t't ' the petitioneris uitling to WITHDRAW his W'P' uith a libertgto file freshW P "
Petitionis dismissedas uithdrau'n with liberty as prayed for'There shall
be no orderas to costs
Miscellaneouspetitions,if anv, pendingin this Writ Pel'ition' shall
stald closed.
SD/. P. PADMANABHAREDDY ASSISTANTREG]STRAR //TRUE COPY' &- SECTION OFF]CER
To I One CC toSRI GU-RRAM^SRlNIVASAdvocate'Ot'"JOr, 2 5nE dd i" siiiF sCt HARSHA REDDY'sc FoRslNc COLLTERTES .1 Two co.LTD CD CoPies[OPUC] PSK. GJP
/
HIGH COURT
DATED:0911112023
ORDER
WP.No.33622 of 2021
1t\ E STr:,1U
v
C.,
r-) 0B ot[ 2t[3 i.
i> t!
/
, t) --.-,.
DISMlSSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
v w
\o
\r/
A. Veereshalingam
The Singareni Colleries Company Ltd
Justice P. Madhavi Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
