Disposed

Podiam Venkata Ramana v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC23 Mar 2023WP/8026/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Hyderabad dismissed a writ petition at the admission stage. The court directed the Special Assistant Agent (3rd respondent) to consider the petitioner's application filed under the Telangana Land Transfer Regulation 1959 within four weeks after providing an opportunity to other respondents.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's application filed on 13.06.2022 under the Telangana Land Transfer Regulation 1959 and pass appropriate orders within four weeks.

Podiam Venkata Ramana Vs State of Telangana — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³³⁰³ I

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE^{STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD}

¶3

(Special Original J urisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY, THE^{TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY THREE}

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI^{JUSTICEJ SREENIVA$ RAO}

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 8026 OF²⁰²³

¶8

Between:

¶9

Podiam Venkata Ramana,^{W/o. Musalaiah, Age 36 years, Occ. Agriculture,} caste. sT,^(Koya), Fl/o.Seethanagaram^{Village, DummugudemMandal,} Bhadradri Kothagudem^District.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

State of Telangana, Rep.^{by its Principal Secretary, Social Welfare} Department, S-ecretariat, Sa^ifa bad,^{Hydera bad.}

¶13

The ITDA Project Officer, Bhadradri^{KothagudemDistrict.}

¶14

ln the Court oi the Special Assistant^{Agent, Sub Divisional MagistrateMobile} Court, At Bhadrachalam.

¶15

Mukkera Bfigt; Laxmi, W/o.^{RajeswaraRao, Aged 60 years, Occ-} Agriculture, Cbste. Perika, R/o Parnasala^{Village, DummugudemMandal,} Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶16

Mukkera Laxmipathi, S/o. Satyam, Aged 50^years, Occ.Ag{cultqtg,^Caste- Perika, R/o Parhasala Village, Dummugudem Mandal,^{Bhadradri Kothagudem} District.

¶17

Mukkera Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Satyam,^{Occ.Agriculture, Caste. Perika,} R/o Parnasala Village, Dummugudem Mandal,^{Bhadradri Kothagudem} District'

¶18

...RESP.NDENTS

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of^{lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the^{High Courtmay be} pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more^particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 3rd^{respondentnot deciding my} application/petition Dt. 13.06.2022 filed Under^{Section 3 of TelanganaLand} Transfer Regulation 1959 as amended by^{1l7O Act, pursuant to agriculturalland} admeasuring Ac.12.38 cents covered by Survey^{No. 20, situatedin Parnasala} Revenue Village, Dummugudem Mandal, Bhadradri^{Kothagudem Districtas illegal,} irregular, irrational and amounts to non discharge^{of legal obligation conferredon} 3rd respondent and offends Article 14 of Constitution^{of lndia and consequently} direct the 3rd respondent to decide^{my pending appealtherein, in accordance with} law.

¶20

il2ll

¶21

lA NO:^{1 OF 2023}

¶22

Petition under^{section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit^{filed in support of the petition, the HighCourt'may be pleased to} directed the^{3rd respondentto decide petitioner apprication/petition Dt. 13.06'2022} pursuant to agricultural^{land admeasuring Ac.12'38 cents coveredby surveyNo'} 20, situated^{in Parnasala Revenue village, DUmmugudemMandal' Bhadradri} Kothagudem^{District and pending disposalof the main writ Petition'}

¶23

Counsel^{for the Petitioner:SRI C' RAMACHANDRA RAJ FPR} SRI. PANGA^SIVANARAYANA

¶24

CounsetfortheRespondentNos.lto3:AGPFoRSocIALWELFARE

¶25

Counsel^{for the Respondent Nos'4 to 6: NONE APPEARED}

¶26

TheCourtatthestageofadmissionmadethefollowing:oRDER

¶27

: i I i :

¶28

I i\

¶29

HON'BLE SRI^{JUSTICEJ. SREENTVASRAO}

¶30

WRIT PETITION^{No'8O26 of 2O23}

¶31

ORDER:

¶32

Heard Sri C.Ramachandra^{Raju,learned counsel} representing on^{behalf of Sri P. Sivanarayalaa,learned counsel} for the petitioner,^{and learned Assistant Government Pleader} for Social Welfare^{appearingon behalf of respondent Nos.1 to} 3.

¶33

The petitioner^{filed this writpetition seeking the} following relief:

¶34

"...to issue^{a writ,order ordirectionmore} particularly one in the nature^{ofWRIT OF} -MANDAMUS declaring the action of 3rd respondent not deciding my apptication/petition^{Dt 13.06-2022} filed^{Und.eiSection 3 of TelanganaLandTlansfer} Regulation 1959 as amended^{by 1/ 7O Act, pursuant} to agrianltural land^{admeasuring Ac L2.38cerrts} mvered bg Suruey^{No.2O,sifitated inParnasala} Reuenue tittage Dummugudem^{Mandal,Bludradri} Kotlwgudem District as^{illegal, irregular,irrational} and amounts to non^{disclwrgeof legal obligation} conferred. on 3rd^{respondent and offends Article14} of Cortstifrttion of India^{and@nsequently direct tlrc} ird respondent to decide^{mg pending appeal therein} in amrdance with law^{and passsuch other order or} orders...o

¶35

With the corrsent of^{learned counsel for the petitioner} as well as learned. Government^{Pleader appearing on behalfof} respondent Nos.l to 3, the^{writ petition is dispoied of at the} stage ot admlsslon.

¶36

Learned counsel for^{thepetitioner submitsthat} petitioner submitted application^{datedL3-c,6.2022to}

¶37

¶38

respondertt No.3, invoking^{the provisionsof TelanganaLand} Transfer Regulation^{1959 as amendedRegulationI /70, but he} has not taken^{anY action till date'}

¶39

5.Withoutgoingintomeritsofthecase,thewritpetition is disposed of^{directing the respondent No.3 to considerthe} application^{submittedby the petitionerdated13-C/6.2022and} pass appropriate^{ord'ers in accordancewith law' within a period} of (Oa) four^{weeksfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this order} after giving^{opportunity to the petitioner as well as unofficial} respondent^{Nos.4 to 6-}

¶40

Accordingly,^{the writ petitionis disposed of'No costs'} As a sequel,^{miscellaneouspetitions' pendingifany'}

¶41

shall stand^closed.

¶42

SD/. R.KARTH ASSISTANT

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To, 1. ln the Court of the Special Assistant Agent, Sub^{Divisional Magistratetvlobile} Court, At Bhadrachalam.

¶48

One CC to SRl. PANGA SIVANARAYANA^Advocate [OPUC]

¶49

Two CCs to GP for Social Welfare, High^{Courtfor the Stateof Telangana at} Hyderabad.[OUTI

¶50

Two CD Copies

CHR PSKz ?J

ar,

HIGH COURT

DATED 12310312023

ORDER

W.P.No.8026 of 2023

\l"E Sir.( ir=
.<br>[J 0 3 [ijn 2[?3

¶58

DISPOSING OF THE^{WRIT PETITION} AT THE STAGE OF^ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS

¶59

-<br>

Podiam Venkata Ramana v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Podiam Venkata Ramana v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Fishermen Co-Op.Society, Karimnagar Dist. Vs the Commissioner of Fisheries,Hyd.,and 4 Otrs.

Pydi Satyanarayana Vs The State of Telangana

M. Suryanarayana And Another Vs The State of Telangana And 6 Others

Nuka Hanumantha Rao Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

Bade Shiva Vs The State of Telangana

Narahari Venkateswarlu Vs The State of Telangana