High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 15104 of 2019 for non-prosecution due to repeated absence of petitioner representation on the scheduled hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FORTHESTATEOF TELANGANA ATHYDERABAD (SPecial OriginalJurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THETWENTY THIRDDAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICE J.SREENIVASRAO
wRtT PETITIONNO: '15104OF 2019
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
(R3 C.T amended as per courtorderdated2510712019inl 'A 2119)
...RESPONOENTS
Petition under Article 226of lhe constitutionof India praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiled therewith,the High Court maybe pleased to issue a writ, order or directionmore particularlyone in the nature of writ of mandamus decladng the orderdated 05/1112018in l.A. No.09 of 2018in o.s.
No. 22 of 2018 and theplaint bearing o.s.No. 22 of 2018 on the file of the 3rd respondent i.e., Revenue Divisionalofficer/AgencyDivisionalofficer,Kothagudem filed by the 4th to 8th respondents againstthe petitioners herein pertaining to lands in Sy. No. 49lElA an extentof Ac. 4-10 Gts. and in Sy. No. 49/E/AA an extent of Ac. 3-10 Gts. situatedin DameracherlaVillage, ChandrugondaMandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District asillegal, null and void and withoutinherent jurisdiction in view of the G.O. Ms. No. 406 dated 2710611990, Home(Courts.A) Department of the then AndhraPradesh Government and consequently set aside the same being without inherentjurisdiction.
lA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition, the High Court may be pleasedto suspend the order datedO511112018madein l.A. No.09 of 2018 in O.S. No. 22 of 2018 including furtherproceedingsof the suit on the file of the 3rd respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitione6:SRlP.DEVENDER Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1TO 3: GP FORREVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4TO 7: SRI D.VAYU SEN Counsel for the Respondent No.8: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLESRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRITPETITION No.15104 of 20L9
oRDER:
When thematter is taken up for hearingon 20 'O3'2O23' therewas no representation on behalf of the petitioners'To give one moreopportunity to the petitioners' the matter wasposted to 23.O3.2023underthe caption 'for dismissal"
SD'. K. VENKAIAH ASSISTANTREGISTRAR /ffRUECOPY// SECTI FFICER
To
1
2 ?;S33Jif$?3=-'fJr'f^ft,4t["^'3"t"Tt:ft]n"st't'orreransana'at 3 H5#?jith?B1ot,sEN,AdvocateroPucl 4 Two CDCoPies
PSK. GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:2310312023
ORDER
WP.No.15104 of 2019
?-
/.:
ri
l-.li.; 2 1 lll 2fi23
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUTCOSTS. L5 @'q"'
tA Pr
N q-vl
"r<br>
Narahari Venkateswarlu
Cherkanmar
State of Telangana
Revenue Divisional Officer Kothagudem
Narahari Laxmi Bai
Baraswathi
J. Sree Nivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
