B.Deepika v. The Cbi, Acb
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed a writ petition seeking a mandate to declare the freezing of the petitioner's bank deposit illegal and to direct the bank to defreeze the account immediately.
What did the court decide?
Directed respondent No.2 to defreeze Term Deposit Receipt No. 62208285503 dated 19.11.2011 within one week and allow operation.
What the court decided
[32s6 ]
HIGH COURTFOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWELFTHDAY OFJUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEMUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
WRlT PETITION NO:720 OF 2023
Between:
B.Deepika, Wo Jyothi Kiran, aged44 years, Occ.Housewife,Rlo 2-2- 6471771G.12, SBI Colony, Bagh Amberpet,Hyderabad-13.
...PETITIONER
AND
- The CBl, ACB, Rep. by its lnspector ofPolice, Kendriya Sadan, SultanBazar, Koti, Hyderabad.
- State Bank of lndia,(PreviouslySBH) Rep.byits Branch Manager,DD
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the freezing of the petitioner's Term Deposit Receipt by the bank was illegal and arbitrary.
Whether the Writ Petition should be disposed of by directing the bank to defreeze the account immediately.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
B.Deepika
- respondent
The CBI, ACB, Rep. by its Inspector of Police
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/720/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court