M.Jalapathi v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Telangana disposed of writ petitions presented for inaction regarding missing computers and failure to file criminal cases. The court held the petitions were not maintainable as the cost was already recovered and the accused parties were not impleaded. The petitions were closed without costs.
What the court decided
[3256 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEMUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 1383 OF 2023
Between:
M.Jalapathi, S/o. Chandraiah, Age 55years, Occ: Jr. Lecturer in OA (vocational), Secretary of the Government Junior Lecturer's Association, Telangana, Peddapally, R:io. H.No.1-99/4, Baddipally, Karimnagar 50500'l.
...PETlTIONER
AND
- The State of Telangana, Rep. by lts Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
- The Commissioner, Board of lntermediate Education, Hyderabad.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can proceed with the writ petition for inaction on missing computers given that the amount was subsequently recovered and the persons implicated are not impleaded.
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as it is now academic.
Whether the petition for filing criminal cases should be allowed when cost recovery has taken place.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Jalapathi
- respondent
The State of Telangana
- respondent
The Commissioner, Board of Intermediate Education
- respondent
The Nodal Officer, District Intermediate Education
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/1383/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court