The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for non-prosecution as the petitioners failed to appear or provide representation on the two scheduled dates of hearing.
No relief granted; petition dismissed for non-prosecution without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY. THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 6759 OF 2013
Between:
(2nd petitioner is rmpleaded as per Court Order, dated 03-06-13 in W.P.M.P. No 11118 of 2013 )
...PET'r.NERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to assue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the lt is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or lirection more particularly one in the of Writ of Mandamus by declarrng the actron of the respondents No 2 for not appointing the enquiry Officer under Section 51 of Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act '1964 against the President of Fishermen Cooperatives Society, Chamappally Karimnagar 3rd Respondent herein as illegal, arbitrary and against the principle of naturaljustice and consequently direct the respondents .No 2 to appoint the enquiry Officer against the President of Fishermen Cooperative Society. Chamanpally, Karinrnagar 3rd Respondent herein.
ll2il
t.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 8468 0F2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Court may bepleased to direct the RespondentNo.3 tohandoverthe all the records pertaining topetitioner Society,pending disposal of the Writ petition.
Counsel for thePetitioners:SRl. V. SRIKANTHA RAO (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR FISHERIES
Counsel forthe RespondentNo.3: SMT B.V. APARNA LAKSHMI
The Court made thefollowing:ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENTVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.6759 of 2OL3
ORDER:
When tlre matter is taken up for hearing on 14.02.2O23, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. To give one opportunity to the petitioners, the matter was posted to 16.02.2023 under the caption 'for dismissal'.
4, Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for nonproseculion. There shail be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand ciosed.
sd/-MoHDSANAULLAH Al!s4B! --.'' - ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUECOPY// SECTI FFICER
to'', one cc to saiv SRIKANTHARAo Advocate toPUCl- - i. Yw; 6;.LGp to' r'"niii"i Hish co"tfor the State of Telansanaat Hvderabad. [OUTI 3 iji,;"bdi;drvri a v APARNALAKSHMIAdvocateIoPUCI 4. Two CDCoPies CHR BS 86h.
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 610212023
ORDER
W.P.No.6759 of 2013
1t\ E STATF
a<br>ar,<br>q
J
() 17 l'iAR ?slx
k O:.. '..
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
el.,l*s
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to lack of representation by the petitioners.
P. Narsingam
Fisheries Industries Cooperative Society
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Deputy Director of Fisheries
B. Thirupahi
J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
