The High Court of Telangana dismissed the writ petition filed by JK Paper Ltd as withdrawn by the petitioner, without ordering costs, effectively ending judicial interference in the disputed tender proceedings.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 34946 OF 2013
Between:
JK Paper Ltd, Nehru House, 4, Bahadur Shah Zafar t\Iarg, New Delhi1]0q0q02represented by its President Sri. Amar Singh lr/ehta S/o Sri. Suttan Singh lt/ehta
...PETITIONER
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other writ declaring that the Tender Notice dated 1Sl1OlZO13 issued by the 1 st Respondent proposing to resell Eucalyptus trees at Units l, ll and lll to the 2nd Respondent which units were already sold to petitioner as XXl, XXV|ll and XXX is illegal, arbitrary and untenable and consequenfly set aside the sale in respect of Units l, ll and lll to the 2nd Respondent besides directing the 1st Respondent corporation to enter into agreement with the petitioner in respect of the said units in pursuance of Letter No.OP.00l/EpWl2O1Z-13t2720 dated 6.9.2012
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 43430 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in the matter of sale of Eucalyptus trees at l, ll and lll
to the 2nd Respondent inpursuance of tender notice dated1511012013issuedby the 1st Respondent
l.A. NO: 1OF 2O14(WVMP. N O: 672OF 2O141
Between:
Vice Chairman & Managing Director,A.P.Forest Development Corporation Ltd 1O-1-12OO,3'd Floor, UNI Building. A.C. (iuards Hyderabad
..PETITIONER/RESP()NDENTNo.1/RESPONDENTNo.1
AND
...RESPONDENT/PETITIONERYPETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS
(Respondent No.2 is not a necessary party to thispetition) .
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat rn the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the Higtl Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dt. 311212013passed in WPlt4P No. 43430 of 2013in WP No' 34946 of 2013
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. SHYAMS. AGARWALREP SRI S. RAJAN
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1:SRl. A. S. Nr\RAYANA-
Counsel for the Respondent No.2:SRIS. SRIDHAR
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENTVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION N0.34946 of 2013
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner. I-rled a letter to the Registrirr (Judicial) on 09 .O2.2023 along with letter addressed by thc petitioner lor secking withdrawal of the writ petition. The matter ls listeci roday under the caption of tithdrawal,. Sri Shyam S Agaru,al, learned counsel representing Sri S. Rajan lcarned counsci for the petitioner seeks to withdraw thc writ petition.
SD/- MOHD. SANAULLAH ANFARI ASSlsrANr REGj)tRAR //rRUE copytt
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 One CC to SRl. S. RAJAN, Advocate [OPUC]
One CC to SRl. A. S. NARAYANA, Advocate TOPUCI
2
One CC to SRl. S. SRIDHAR, Advocate [OPUC]
3
4
GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:1510212023
ORDER
, --'; ': i, sj i;17't'
t' al
2 6 .,iT 2iTil
\i9
WP.No.34946 of 2013
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
(Qr
JK Paper Ltd
Andhra Pradesh Forest Development Corporation
ITC Ltd
J SREENTVAS RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
